Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3039190845> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 99 of
99
with 100 items per page.
- W3039190845 endingPage "824" @default.
- W3039190845 startingPage "824" @default.
- W3039190845 abstract ": This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated differences in accuracy, operation time, and radiation exposure time between robot-assisted and freehand techniques for pedicle screw insertion. Two investigators independently searched for articles on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from 2012 to 2019. The final meta-analysis included seven RCTs. We compared the accuracy of pedicle screw placement, operation time, and radiation exposure time between robot-assisted and conventional freehand groups. Seven RCTs included 540 patients and placement of 2,476 pedicle screws, of which 1,220 were inserted using the robot-assisted technique and 1,256 were inserted using the conventional freehand technique. The pedicle screw positions were classified using the Gertzbein and Robbins classification (grade A-E). The combined results of Grade A [odds ratio (OR) =1.68; 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.82–3.44; P=0.16), Grade A+B (OR =1.70; 95% CI: 0.47–6.13; P=0.42), and Grade C+D+E (OR =0.59; 95% CI: 0.16–2.12; P=0.42) for the accuracy rate revealed no significant difference between the two groups. Subgroup analysis results revealed that the TiRobot-assisted technique presented a significantly improved pedicle screw insertion accuracy rate compared with that of the conventional freehand technique, based on Grade A, Grade A+B, and Grade C+D+E classifications. The SpineAssist-assisted technique presented an inferior pedicle screw insertion accuracy rate compared with that of the conventional freehand technique, based on Grade A, Grade A+B, and Grade C+D+E classifications. No difference between the Renaissance-assisted and conventional freehand techniques was noted for pedicle screw insertion accuracy rates, based on both Grade A (OR =1.58; 95% CI: 0.85–2.96; P=0.15), Grade A+B (OR =2.20; 95% CI: 0.39–12.43; P=0.37), and Grade C+D+E (OR =0.45; 95% CI: 0.08–2.56; P=0.37) classifications. Regarding operation time, robot-assisted surgery had significantly longer operation time than conventional freehand surgery. The robot-assisted group had significantly shorter radiation exposure time. Regarding the pedicle screw insertion accuracy rate, the TiRobot-assisted technique was superior, the SpineAssist-assisted technique was inferior, and Renaissance was similar to the conventional freehand technique." @default.
- W3039190845 created "2020-07-10" @default.
- W3039190845 creator A5005660358 @default.
- W3039190845 creator A5043442124 @default.
- W3039190845 creator A5066260698 @default.
- W3039190845 creator A5072128246 @default.
- W3039190845 date "2020-07-01" @default.
- W3039190845 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
- W3039190845 title "Accuracy of robot-assisted versus conventional freehand pedicle screw placement in spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials" @default.
- W3039190845 cites W1223023105 @default.
- W3039190845 cites W1973649422 @default.
- W3039190845 cites W1974417522 @default.
- W3039190845 cites W2007367849 @default.
- W3039190845 cites W2007794610 @default.
- W3039190845 cites W2020597461 @default.
- W3039190845 cites W2048824698 @default.
- W3039190845 cites W2049633579 @default.
- W3039190845 cites W2073770499 @default.
- W3039190845 cites W2086301811 @default.
- W3039190845 cites W2088839360 @default.
- W3039190845 cites W2092676559 @default.
- W3039190845 cites W2128038049 @default.
- W3039190845 cites W2140638732 @default.
- W3039190845 cites W2240384178 @default.
- W3039190845 cites W2308618544 @default.
- W3039190845 cites W2317326679 @default.
- W3039190845 cites W2318019373 @default.
- W3039190845 cites W2347079542 @default.
- W3039190845 cites W2463069568 @default.
- W3039190845 cites W2473579408 @default.
- W3039190845 cites W2522717822 @default.
- W3039190845 cites W2524526560 @default.
- W3039190845 cites W2763362633 @default.
- W3039190845 cites W2766314891 @default.
- W3039190845 cites W2792215746 @default.
- W3039190845 cites W2806482900 @default.
- W3039190845 cites W2888795453 @default.
- W3039190845 cites W2912463899 @default.
- W3039190845 cites W2914902411 @default.
- W3039190845 cites W2921598832 @default.
- W3039190845 cites W2968304512 @default.
- W3039190845 cites W3022903699 @default.
- W3039190845 doi "https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-1106" @default.
- W3039190845 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/7396236" @default.
- W3039190845 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32793669" @default.
- W3039190845 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
- W3039190845 type Work @default.
- W3039190845 sameAs 3039190845 @default.
- W3039190845 citedByCount "32" @default.
- W3039190845 countsByYear W30391908452021 @default.
- W3039190845 countsByYear W30391908452022 @default.
- W3039190845 countsByYear W30391908452023 @default.
- W3039190845 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3039190845 hasAuthorship W3039190845A5005660358 @default.
- W3039190845 hasAuthorship W3039190845A5043442124 @default.
- W3039190845 hasAuthorship W3039190845A5066260698 @default.
- W3039190845 hasAuthorship W3039190845A5072128246 @default.
- W3039190845 hasBestOaLocation W30391908451 @default.
- W3039190845 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W3039190845 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W3039190845 hasConcept C156957248 @default.
- W3039190845 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
- W3039190845 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
- W3039190845 hasConcept C3018023364 @default.
- W3039190845 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
- W3039190845 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W3039190845 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
- W3039190845 hasConceptScore W3039190845C126322002 @default.
- W3039190845 hasConceptScore W3039190845C141071460 @default.
- W3039190845 hasConceptScore W3039190845C156957248 @default.
- W3039190845 hasConceptScore W3039190845C168563851 @default.
- W3039190845 hasConceptScore W3039190845C2989005 @default.
- W3039190845 hasConceptScore W3039190845C3018023364 @default.
- W3039190845 hasConceptScore W3039190845C44249647 @default.
- W3039190845 hasConceptScore W3039190845C71924100 @default.
- W3039190845 hasConceptScore W3039190845C95190672 @default.
- W3039190845 hasIssue "13" @default.
- W3039190845 hasLocation W30391908451 @default.
- W3039190845 hasLocation W30391908452 @default.
- W3039190845 hasLocation W30391908453 @default.
- W3039190845 hasOpenAccess W3039190845 @default.
- W3039190845 hasPrimaryLocation W30391908451 @default.
- W3039190845 hasRelatedWork W1843463370 @default.
- W3039190845 hasRelatedWork W1982619745 @default.
- W3039190845 hasRelatedWork W2002325000 @default.
- W3039190845 hasRelatedWork W2011867183 @default.
- W3039190845 hasRelatedWork W2076929529 @default.
- W3039190845 hasRelatedWork W2114056959 @default.
- W3039190845 hasRelatedWork W2417545465 @default.
- W3039190845 hasRelatedWork W2996661745 @default.
- W3039190845 hasRelatedWork W2999586795 @default.
- W3039190845 hasRelatedWork W4225673987 @default.
- W3039190845 hasVolume "8" @default.
- W3039190845 isParatext "false" @default.
- W3039190845 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W3039190845 magId "3039190845" @default.
- W3039190845 workType "article" @default.