FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3039675150> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3039675150 endingPage "374" @default.
• W3039675150 startingPage "368" @default.
• W3039675150 abstract "Anatomical placement of an ACL graft is critical to the clinical outcome of an ACL reconstruction. The purpose of the study was to compare the conventional technique of drilling a femoral tunnel from a medial portal while viewing it from a lateral portal versus viewing it from a high anteromedial portal and drilling it from a low medial portal. We hypothesized that the high anteromedial portal possibly provides an end-on view of the tunnel and would lead to a more favourable tunnel position.Sixty patients underwent arthroscopic single-bundle ACL reconstruction with a soft tissue graft. All patients had the same surgeon and same surgical technique (except viewing portal). Each patient underwent a 3D-CT 1-week post-op. We classified the patients into two groups (technique A and B) of 30 each. Postoperative tunnel position in each patient was visualized on CT scan with 3D reconstruction by the quadrant method described by Bernard et al. The distance of the centre of the femoral tunnel from the superior and posterior border of the Bernard frame was obtained in each patient of the two groups and mean value in each group was obtained and compared by Student 't' test at 5% level of significance. The position of the femoral tunnels was also studied in reference to the lateral intercondylar ridge and classified into type I (well placed), type II (moderately malpositioned) and type III (grossly malpositioned).The mean distances in technique A from the posterior and superior border of the lateral femoral condyle was 35.8 ± 8.2 and 35.2 ± 6.7, and in technique B was 38.1 ± 8.6 and 35.8 ± 9.4. The two groups did not differ significantly (P > 0.05) in femoral tunnel position as visualized on 3D-CT scan postoperatively. 53.3% patients had well-placed tunnels (type I) overall with 56.67% of technique A and 50% of technique B in this group. None of the tunnels were grossly malpositioned.The absence of any statistically significant difference between the groups suggests that a high anterolateral portal close to the patellar tendon gives an almost complete view of the lateral aspect of the notch, if not end on. Both techniques produced a majority of well placed (type I) tunnels." @default.
• W3039675150 created "2020-07-10" @default.
• W3039675150 creator A5000328072 @default.
• W3039675150 creator A5028330673 @default.
• W3039675150 creator A5068332633 @default.
• W3039675150 creator A5078231716 @default.
• W3039675150 date "2020-07-13" @default.
• W3039675150 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W3039675150 title "Does Viewing the ACL Femoral Footprint End on Using a High Medial Portal Produce Better Tunnel Placement as Compared to Viewing it from a Lateral Portal while Drilling: A 3D CT-based Pilot Study" @default.
• W3039675150 cites W2005814820 @default.
• W3039675150 cites W2008236666 @default.
• W3039675150 cites W2013029886 @default.
• W3039675150 cites W2021064343 @default.
• W3039675150 cites W2031128938 @default.
• W3039675150 cites W2107901539 @default.
• W3039675150 cites W2126524961 @default.
• W3039675150 cites W2134473653 @default.
• W3039675150 cites W2145990728 @default.
• W3039675150 cites W2153378360 @default.
• W3039675150 cites W2220301670 @default.
• W3039675150 cites W2344615688 @default.
• W3039675150 cites W2793920009 @default.
• W3039675150 cites W2953745746 @default.
• W3039675150 doi "https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-020-00179-3" @default.
• W3039675150 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/8046892" @default.
• W3039675150 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33927815" @default.
• W3039675150 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3039675150 type Work @default.
• W3039675150 sameAs 3039675150 @default.
• W3039675150 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W3039675150 countsByYear W30396751502021 @default.
• W3039675150 countsByYear W30396751502022 @default.
• W3039675150 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3039675150 hasAuthorship W3039675150A5000328072 @default.
• W3039675150 hasAuthorship W3039675150A5028330673 @default.
• W3039675150 hasAuthorship W3039675150A5068332633 @default.
• W3039675150 hasAuthorship W3039675150A5078231716 @default.
• W3039675150 hasBestOaLocation W30396751502 @default.
• W3039675150 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W3039675150 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3039675150 hasConcept C2780639617 @default.
• W3039675150 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W3039675150 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3039675150 hasConceptScore W3039675150C126838900 @default.
• W3039675150 hasConceptScore W3039675150C141071460 @default.
• W3039675150 hasConceptScore W3039675150C2780639617 @default.
• W3039675150 hasConceptScore W3039675150C2989005 @default.
• W3039675150 hasConceptScore W3039675150C71924100 @default.
• W3039675150 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W3039675150 hasLocation W30396751501 @default.
• W3039675150 hasLocation W30396751502 @default.
• W3039675150 hasLocation W30396751503 @default.
• W3039675150 hasOpenAccess W3039675150 @default.
• W3039675150 hasPrimaryLocation W30396751501 @default.
• W3039675150 hasRelatedWork W2002120878 @default.
• W3039675150 hasRelatedWork W2003938723 @default.
• W3039675150 hasRelatedWork W2047967234 @default.
• W3039675150 hasRelatedWork W2118496982 @default.
• W3039675150 hasRelatedWork W2364998975 @default.
• W3039675150 hasRelatedWork W2369162477 @default.
• W3039675150 hasRelatedWork W2439875401 @default.
• W3039675150 hasRelatedWork W4238867864 @default.
• W3039675150 hasRelatedWork W2519357708 @default.
• W3039675150 hasRelatedWork W2525756941 @default.
• W3039675150 hasVolume "55" @default.
• W3039675150 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3039675150 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3039675150 magId "3039675150" @default.
• W3039675150 workType "article" @default.