Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3039694894> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W3039694894 abstract "1 Abstract Introduction Decision-making on matters of public health and health policy requires the balancing of numerous, often conflicting factors. However, a broad societal discourse and a participatory decision-making process on the criteria underpinning the decision was often not feasible within the time constraints imposed on by the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. While evidence-to-decision frameworks are not able or intended to replace stakeholder participation, they can serve as a tool to approach relevancy and comprehensiveness of the criteria considered. Objective To develop a decision-making framework adapted to the challenges of decision-making on national and sub-national level implementation of non-pharmacological interventions (NPIs) measures to contain the global SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Methods We employed the “best-fit” framework synthesis technique and used the WHO-INTEGRATE framework Version 1.0 as a starting point. In a first phase adapted the framework through brainstorming exercises and application to exemplary case studies (e.g. school reopening). In a second phase we conducted a content analysis of comprehensive strategy documents intended to guide policymakers on the phasing out of applied lockdown measures in Germany. Based on factors and criteria identified in this process, we adapted previous framework versions into the WICID ( W HO- I NTEGRATE C OV ID- 19) framework Version 1.0. Results Twelve comprehensive strategy documents were included in the content analysis. The revised WICID framework consists of eleven criteria, supported by 48 aspects, the metacriterion quality of evidence and embraces a complexity and systems-perspective. The criteria cover implications for the health of individuals and populations due to and beyond COVID-19, infringement on liberties and fundamental human rights, acceptability and equity considerations, societal, environmental, and economic implications, as well as resource and feasibility considerations. Discussion In a third phase, the proposed framework will be expanded through a comprehensive document analysis focusing on key-stakeholder groups across the society. The WICID framework can be a tool to support comprehensive evidence-informed decision-making processes. 2 Key-questions What is already known? Ad-hoc Decision-making on matters of public health and health policy such as non-pharmaceutical interventions to contain the global SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, requires decision-makers to balance numerous and often conflicting criteria. Insufficient consideration of relevant factors reduces acceptance and can limit the effectiveness of the intervention. What are the new findings? Based on a content-analysis of comprehensive strategy documents, we newly developed WICID framework provides of 11+1 criteria informed by 47 aspects which are intended to support decision-makers in the balancing act of identifying and considering criteria of relevance. What do the new findings imply? The usage of the WICID evidence-to-decision framework can support decision-makers and expert committees in making more balanced decision, even if not all voices of relevant stakeholders could be included in the process due to time constraints imposed by the rapid progress of the pandemic." @default.
- W3039694894 created "2020-07-10" @default.
- W3039694894 creator A5014748078 @default.
- W3039694894 creator A5042881656 @default.
- W3039694894 creator A5047580900 @default.
- W3039694894 date "2020-07-07" @default.
- W3039694894 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
- W3039694894 title "WICID framework Version 1.0: Criteria and considerations to guide evidence-informed decision-making on non-pharmacological interventions targeting COVID-19" @default.
- W3039694894 cites W1535608039 @default.
- W3039694894 cites W1552377677 @default.
- W3039694894 cites W1946608582 @default.
- W3039694894 cites W1970111527 @default.
- W3039694894 cites W1975941913 @default.
- W3039694894 cites W1998930630 @default.
- W3039694894 cites W2018254624 @default.
- W3039694894 cites W2022396606 @default.
- W3039694894 cites W2029678497 @default.
- W3039694894 cites W2057521707 @default.
- W3039694894 cites W2061047292 @default.
- W3039694894 cites W2061276405 @default.
- W3039694894 cites W2068075745 @default.
- W3039694894 cites W2075467131 @default.
- W3039694894 cites W2077262353 @default.
- W3039694894 cites W2084049643 @default.
- W3039694894 cites W2097389783 @default.
- W3039694894 cites W2099486643 @default.
- W3039694894 cites W2106311978 @default.
- W3039694894 cites W2116778487 @default.
- W3039694894 cites W2137684083 @default.
- W3039694894 cites W2138147903 @default.
- W3039694894 cites W2138664283 @default.
- W3039694894 cites W2145667053 @default.
- W3039694894 cites W2146082684 @default.
- W3039694894 cites W2155993373 @default.
- W3039694894 cites W2157133596 @default.
- W3039694894 cites W2163611479 @default.
- W3039694894 cites W2168814190 @default.
- W3039694894 cites W2170413988 @default.
- W3039694894 cites W2170621602 @default.
- W3039694894 cites W2470058069 @default.
- W3039694894 cites W2472243577 @default.
- W3039694894 cites W2488065292 @default.
- W3039694894 cites W2587580473 @default.
- W3039694894 cites W2591545590 @default.
- W3039694894 cites W2626277945 @default.
- W3039694894 cites W2733261733 @default.
- W3039694894 cites W2767322514 @default.
- W3039694894 cites W2913055454 @default.
- W3039694894 cites W2913563954 @default.
- W3039694894 cites W2913705783 @default.
- W3039694894 cites W2944574584 @default.
- W3039694894 cites W2968430102 @default.
- W3039694894 cites W3011923706 @default.
- W3039694894 cites W3012006042 @default.
- W3039694894 cites W3022167809 @default.
- W3039694894 cites W3026903838 @default.
- W3039694894 cites W3030622209 @default.
- W3039694894 cites W3037921181 @default.
- W3039694894 cites W879181764 @default.
- W3039694894 doi "https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.03.20145755" @default.
- W3039694894 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
- W3039694894 type Work @default.
- W3039694894 sameAs 3039694894 @default.
- W3039694894 citedByCount "2" @default.
- W3039694894 countsByYear W30396948942020 @default.
- W3039694894 countsByYear W30396948942021 @default.
- W3039694894 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
- W3039694894 hasAuthorship W3039694894A5014748078 @default.
- W3039694894 hasAuthorship W3039694894A5042881656 @default.
- W3039694894 hasAuthorship W3039694894A5047580900 @default.
- W3039694894 hasBestOaLocation W30396948941 @default.
- W3039694894 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
- W3039694894 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
- W3039694894 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
- W3039694894 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W3039694894 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
- W3039694894 hasConcept C150672426 @default.
- W3039694894 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
- W3039694894 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W3039694894 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
- W3039694894 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W3039694894 hasConcept C195094911 @default.
- W3039694894 hasConcept C201305675 @default.
- W3039694894 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
- W3039694894 hasConcept C2779530757 @default.
- W3039694894 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
- W3039694894 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W3039694894 hasConcept C539667460 @default.
- W3039694894 hasConcept C56739046 @default.
- W3039694894 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W3039694894 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
- W3039694894 hasConceptScore W3039694894C111472728 @default.
- W3039694894 hasConceptScore W3039694894C111919701 @default.
- W3039694894 hasConceptScore W3039694894C127413603 @default.
- W3039694894 hasConceptScore W3039694894C138885662 @default.
- W3039694894 hasConceptScore W3039694894C144133560 @default.
- W3039694894 hasConceptScore W3039694894C150672426 @default.
- W3039694894 hasConceptScore W3039694894C154945302 @default.
- W3039694894 hasConceptScore W3039694894C15744967 @default.
- W3039694894 hasConceptScore W3039694894C159110408 @default.