Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3040972323> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W3040972323 endingPage "656" @default.
- W3040972323 startingPage "643" @default.
- W3040972323 abstract "Objectives Contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is now broadly used clinically for liver lesion detection and characterization. Obstacles to the efforts to quantify perfusion with CEUS have been the lack of a standardized approach and undocumented reproducibility. The use of multiple scanners and different analysis software packages compounds the degree of variability. Our objectives were to standardize a CEUS-based approach for quantification of perfusion-related parameters of liver lesions and to evaluate the variability of bolus transit parameters (rise time [RT], mean transit time [MTT], peak intensity, and area under the curve) obtained from various clinical ultrasound scanners and analysis software. Materials and Methods Bolus transit as a way of evaluating perfusion has been investigated both in vivo and in vitro in the past but without establishing its reproducibility. We developed a tissue flow phantom that produces time-intensity curves very similar to those extracted from clinical cine loops of liver lesions. We evaluated the variability of the bolus transit parameters with 4 commercial scanners (Philips iU22, Philips EPIQ, GE LOGIQ E9, and Siemens Acuson Sequoia) and 3 different analysis software packages in multiple trials (15 per scanner). Results The variability (coefficient of variation) from repeated trials and while using a single scanner and software was less than 8% for RT, less than 12% for MTT, less than 49% for peak intensity, and less than 50% for area under the curve. Currently, it is not possible to directly compare amplitude values from different scanners and analysis software packages owing to the arbitrary linearization algorithm used among manufacturers; however, it is possible for time parameters (RT and MTT). The variability when using a different scanner with the same analysis software package was less than 9% for RT and less than 21% for MTT. The variability when using a different analysis software with the same scanner was less than 9% for RT and less than 15% for MTT. In all the evaluations we have performed, RT is the least variable parameter, while MTT is only slightly more variable. Conclusions The present study will lay the groundwork for multicenter patient evaluations with CEUS quantification of perfusion-related parameters with the bolus transit technique. When using the protocol and method developed here, it is possible to perform perfusion quantification on different scanners and analysis software and be able to compare the results. The current work is the first study that presents a comparison of bolus transit parameters derived from multiple systems and software packages." @default.
- W3040972323 created "2020-07-16" @default.
- W3040972323 creator A5012123615 @default.
- W3040972323 creator A5022985471 @default.
- W3040972323 creator A5024005466 @default.
- W3040972323 creator A5027682170 @default.
- W3040972323 creator A5039134743 @default.
- W3040972323 creator A5060587061 @default.
- W3040972323 creator A5088654582 @default.
- W3040972323 date "2020-07-09" @default.
- W3040972323 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
- W3040972323 title "Evaluation of the Reproducibility of Bolus Transit Quantification With Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Across Multiple Scanners and Analysis Software Packages—A Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance Study" @default.
- W3040972323 cites W1658246335 @default.
- W3040972323 cites W1834986685 @default.
- W3040972323 cites W1970631170 @default.
- W3040972323 cites W1984128726 @default.
- W3040972323 cites W1993978830 @default.
- W3040972323 cites W1997415562 @default.
- W3040972323 cites W2019607817 @default.
- W3040972323 cites W2025912081 @default.
- W3040972323 cites W2027793803 @default.
- W3040972323 cites W2043399672 @default.
- W3040972323 cites W2047959632 @default.
- W3040972323 cites W2056038354 @default.
- W3040972323 cites W2067686747 @default.
- W3040972323 cites W2088302753 @default.
- W3040972323 cites W2094785364 @default.
- W3040972323 cites W2125048739 @default.
- W3040972323 cites W2131068851 @default.
- W3040972323 cites W2149278045 @default.
- W3040972323 cites W2151062573 @default.
- W3040972323 cites W2151507988 @default.
- W3040972323 cites W2153321945 @default.
- W3040972323 cites W2164056348 @default.
- W3040972323 cites W2317852051 @default.
- W3040972323 cites W2576624852 @default.
- W3040972323 cites W2741526814 @default.
- W3040972323 cites W2754397122 @default.
- W3040972323 cites W2787593267 @default.
- W3040972323 cites W2807651080 @default.
- W3040972323 cites W2893556288 @default.
- W3040972323 cites W2911517786 @default.
- W3040972323 cites W2992332278 @default.
- W3040972323 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/rli.0000000000000702" @default.
- W3040972323 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32898356" @default.
- W3040972323 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
- W3040972323 type Work @default.
- W3040972323 sameAs 3040972323 @default.
- W3040972323 citedByCount "10" @default.
- W3040972323 countsByYear W30409723232020 @default.
- W3040972323 countsByYear W30409723232021 @default.
- W3040972323 countsByYear W30409723232022 @default.
- W3040972323 countsByYear W30409723232023 @default.
- W3040972323 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3040972323 hasAuthorship W3040972323A5012123615 @default.
- W3040972323 hasAuthorship W3040972323A5022985471 @default.
- W3040972323 hasAuthorship W3040972323A5024005466 @default.
- W3040972323 hasAuthorship W3040972323A5027682170 @default.
- W3040972323 hasAuthorship W3040972323A5039134743 @default.
- W3040972323 hasAuthorship W3040972323A5060587061 @default.
- W3040972323 hasAuthorship W3040972323A5088654582 @default.
- W3040972323 hasConcept C104293457 @default.
- W3040972323 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
- W3040972323 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
- W3040972323 hasConcept C135691158 @default.
- W3040972323 hasConcept C136229726 @default.
- W3040972323 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W3040972323 hasConcept C143753070 @default.
- W3040972323 hasConcept C146957229 @default.
- W3040972323 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
- W3040972323 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
- W3040972323 hasConcept C2777904410 @default.
- W3040972323 hasConcept C2779585989 @default.
- W3040972323 hasConcept C2779751349 @default.
- W3040972323 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
- W3040972323 hasConcept C3019368741 @default.
- W3040972323 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W3040972323 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W3040972323 hasConcept C43376680 @default.
- W3040972323 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W3040972323 hasConcept C9893847 @default.
- W3040972323 hasConceptScore W3040972323C104293457 @default.
- W3040972323 hasConceptScore W3040972323C105795698 @default.
- W3040972323 hasConceptScore W3040972323C126838900 @default.
- W3040972323 hasConceptScore W3040972323C135691158 @default.
- W3040972323 hasConceptScore W3040972323C136229726 @default.
- W3040972323 hasConceptScore W3040972323C141071460 @default.
- W3040972323 hasConceptScore W3040972323C143753070 @default.
- W3040972323 hasConceptScore W3040972323C146957229 @default.
- W3040972323 hasConceptScore W3040972323C154945302 @default.
- W3040972323 hasConceptScore W3040972323C199360897 @default.
- W3040972323 hasConceptScore W3040972323C2777904410 @default.
- W3040972323 hasConceptScore W3040972323C2779585989 @default.
- W3040972323 hasConceptScore W3040972323C2779751349 @default.
- W3040972323 hasConceptScore W3040972323C2989005 @default.
- W3040972323 hasConceptScore W3040972323C3019368741 @default.
- W3040972323 hasConceptScore W3040972323C33923547 @default.
- W3040972323 hasConceptScore W3040972323C41008148 @default.