FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3041095049> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3041095049 endingPage "9" @default.
• W3041095049 startingPage "1" @default.
• W3041095049 abstract "Background . Use of laryngeal mask airway as an alternative to the endotracheal tube has attracted the attention of several workers with regard to intraocular pressure changes. However, the previous studies have reported different results while comparing intraocular pressure, following insertion of laryngeal mask airway or the endotracheal tube. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis was aimed to generate the best possible evidence on the intraocular pressure response to endotracheal tube intubation and laryngeal mask airway insertion. Methods . Electronic databases like PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, Google Scholar, Cochrane library databases, and Mednar were used. All original peer-reviewed papers which reported the mean and standard deviation of IOP before and after airway instrumentation in both groups were included. Two reviewers independently extracted the data using a standardized data extraction format for eligibility and appraised their quality. Data were analyzed using the STATA version 14 software. The pooled standard mean difference was estimated with the random-effect model. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed by the I 2 statistics test. A subgroup analysis was done to assess the source of variation between the studies. Result . A total of 47 research papers were reviewed, of which, six studies were finally included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The overall pooled standard mean difference of intraocular pressure was 1.30 (95% CI, 0.70, 1.90), showing that LMA insertion is better than ETT intubation to maintain stable intraocular pressure. A random-effect model was employed to estimate the pooled standard mean differences due to severe heterogeneity ( I 2 79.45, <mml:math xmlns:mml=http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML id=M1><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math> ≤ 0.001). Conclusion . The available information suggests that the LMA provides lesser intraocular pressure response in comparison with the conventional tracheal tube." @default.
• W3041095049 created "2020-07-16" @default.
• W3041095049 creator A5008017460 @default.
• W3041095049 creator A5011456283 @default.
• W3041095049 creator A5020354039 @default.
• W3041095049 creator A5020882684 @default.
• W3041095049 creator A5027581621 @default.
• W3041095049 creator A5045505043 @default.
• W3041095049 creator A5047037983 @default.
• W3041095049 creator A5052757351 @default.
• W3041095049 creator A5053876771 @default.
• W3041095049 creator A5056501905 @default.
• W3041095049 creator A5081015478 @default.
• W3041095049 creator A5081173753 @default.
• W3041095049 creator A5087815010 @default.
• W3041095049 creator A5088121355 @default.
• W3041095049 creator A5089987080 @default.
• W3041095049 creator A5091257309 @default.
• W3041095049 date "2020-07-09" @default.
• W3041095049 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W3041095049 title "Effect of Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion on Intraocular Pressure Response: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" @default.
• W3041095049 cites W104191386 @default.
• W3041095049 cites W1510201713 @default.
• W3041095049 cites W1601401662 @default.
• W3041095049 cites W18879769 @default.
• W3041095049 cites W1966958822 @default.
• W3041095049 cites W1974338185 @default.
• W3041095049 cites W1984776600 @default.
• W3041095049 cites W1992084872 @default.
• W3041095049 cites W1997889941 @default.
• W3041095049 cites W2005501262 @default.
• W3041095049 cites W2028220402 @default.
• W3041095049 cites W2055440293 @default.
• W3041095049 cites W2063366621 @default.
• W3041095049 cites W2078954048 @default.
• W3041095049 cites W2093675062 @default.
• W3041095049 cites W2119308029 @default.
• W3041095049 cites W2123159248 @default.
• W3041095049 cites W2131873701 @default.
• W3041095049 cites W2137263748 @default.
• W3041095049 cites W2147026058 @default.
• W3041095049 cites W3034399764 @default.
• W3041095049 cites W4240722826 @default.
• W3041095049 cites W58854938 @default.
• W3041095049 cites W87188368 @default.
• W3041095049 doi "https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7858434" @default.
• W3041095049 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/7368206" @default.
• W3041095049 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32695160" @default.
• W3041095049 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3041095049 type Work @default.
• W3041095049 sameAs 3041095049 @default.
• W3041095049 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W3041095049 countsByYear W30410950492022 @default.
• W3041095049 countsByYear W30410950492023 @default.
• W3041095049 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3041095049 hasAuthorship W3041095049A5008017460 @default.
• W3041095049 hasAuthorship W3041095049A5011456283 @default.
• W3041095049 hasAuthorship W3041095049A5020354039 @default.
• W3041095049 hasAuthorship W3041095049A5020882684 @default.
• W3041095049 hasAuthorship W3041095049A5027581621 @default.
• W3041095049 hasAuthorship W3041095049A5045505043 @default.
• W3041095049 hasAuthorship W3041095049A5047037983 @default.
• W3041095049 hasAuthorship W3041095049A5052757351 @default.
• W3041095049 hasAuthorship W3041095049A5053876771 @default.
• W3041095049 hasAuthorship W3041095049A5056501905 @default.
• W3041095049 hasAuthorship W3041095049A5081015478 @default.
• W3041095049 hasAuthorship W3041095049A5081173753 @default.
• W3041095049 hasAuthorship W3041095049A5087815010 @default.
• W3041095049 hasAuthorship W3041095049A5088121355 @default.
• W3041095049 hasAuthorship W3041095049A5089987080 @default.
• W3041095049 hasAuthorship W3041095049A5091257309 @default.
• W3041095049 hasBestOaLocation W30410950491 @default.
• W3041095049 hasConcept C105922876 @default.
• W3041095049 hasConcept C119423318 @default.
• W3041095049 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3041095049 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3041095049 hasConcept C143781015 @default.
• W3041095049 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3041095049 hasConcept C187960798 @default.
• W3041095049 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
• W3041095049 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3041095049 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
• W3041095049 hasConcept C2776900724 @default.
• W3041095049 hasConcept C2778716859 @default.
• W3041095049 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W3041095049 hasConcept C2780439572 @default.
• W3041095049 hasConcept C2781092963 @default.
• W3041095049 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W3041095049 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3041095049 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W3041095049 hasConceptScore W3041095049C105922876 @default.
• W3041095049 hasConceptScore W3041095049C119423318 @default.
• W3041095049 hasConceptScore W3041095049C126322002 @default.
• W3041095049 hasConceptScore W3041095049C141071460 @default.
• W3041095049 hasConceptScore W3041095049C143781015 @default.
• W3041095049 hasConceptScore W3041095049C17744445 @default.
• W3041095049 hasConceptScore W3041095049C187960798 @default.
• W3041095049 hasConceptScore W3041095049C189708586 @default.

• next