Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3043936504> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 90 of
90
with 100 items per page.
- W3043936504 endingPage "110433" @default.
- W3043936504 startingPage "110433" @default.
- W3043936504 abstract "Forensic testimony plays a crucial role in many criminal cases, with requests to crime laboratories steadily increasing. As part of efforts to improve the reliability of forensic evidence, scientific and policy groups increasingly recommend routine and blind proficiency tests of practitioners. What is not known is how doing so affects how lay jurors assess testimony by forensic practitioners in court. In Study 1, we recruited 1398 lay participants, recruited online using Qualtrics to create a sample representative of the U.S. population with respect to age, gender, income, race/ethnicity, and geographic region. Each read a mock criminal trial transcript in which a forensic examiner presented the central evidence. The low-proficiency forensic examiner elicited a lower conviction rate and less favorable impressions than the control, an examiner for which no proficiency information was disclosed. However, the high-proficiency examiner did not correspondingly elicit a higher conviction rate or more favorable impressions than the control. In Study 2, 1420 participants, similarly recruited using Qualtrics, received the same testimony, but for some conditions the examiner was cross-examined by a defense attorney. We find cross-examination significantly reduced guilty votes and examiner ratings for low-proficiency examiners. These results suggest that disclosing results of blind proficiency testing can inform jury decision-making, and further, that defense lawyering can make proficiency information particularly salient at a criminal trial." @default.
- W3043936504 created "2020-07-29" @default.
- W3043936504 creator A5010715904 @default.
- W3043936504 creator A5077181796 @default.
- W3043936504 creator A5086639773 @default.
- W3043936504 date "2020-10-01" @default.
- W3043936504 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
- W3043936504 title "Juror appraisals of forensic evidence: Effects of blind proficiency and cross-examination" @default.
- W3043936504 cites W1559803947 @default.
- W3043936504 cites W1640267525 @default.
- W3043936504 cites W1872112685 @default.
- W3043936504 cites W1894791294 @default.
- W3043936504 cites W1967992372 @default.
- W3043936504 cites W2010824342 @default.
- W3043936504 cites W2028728384 @default.
- W3043936504 cites W2043125628 @default.
- W3043936504 cites W2044241068 @default.
- W3043936504 cites W2075585362 @default.
- W3043936504 cites W2084284039 @default.
- W3043936504 cites W2087484885 @default.
- W3043936504 cites W2106509144 @default.
- W3043936504 cites W2110516497 @default.
- W3043936504 cites W2125184020 @default.
- W3043936504 cites W2132313324 @default.
- W3043936504 cites W2144872385 @default.
- W3043936504 cites W2538438789 @default.
- W3043936504 cites W2542849884 @default.
- W3043936504 cites W2767666399 @default.
- W3043936504 cites W2913592271 @default.
- W3043936504 cites W2917469868 @default.
- W3043936504 cites W2924381775 @default.
- W3043936504 cites W2973927349 @default.
- W3043936504 cites W2980055362 @default.
- W3043936504 cites W2991160925 @default.
- W3043936504 cites W2997726134 @default.
- W3043936504 cites W3016313691 @default.
- W3043936504 cites W3125283999 @default.
- W3043936504 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110433" @default.
- W3043936504 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32763747" @default.
- W3043936504 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
- W3043936504 type Work @default.
- W3043936504 sameAs 3043936504 @default.
- W3043936504 citedByCount "7" @default.
- W3043936504 countsByYear W30439365042020 @default.
- W3043936504 countsByYear W30439365042021 @default.
- W3043936504 countsByYear W30439365042022 @default.
- W3043936504 countsByYear W30439365042023 @default.
- W3043936504 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3043936504 hasAuthorship W3043936504A5010715904 @default.
- W3043936504 hasAuthorship W3043936504A5077181796 @default.
- W3043936504 hasAuthorship W3043936504A5086639773 @default.
- W3043936504 hasBestOaLocation W30439365042 @default.
- W3043936504 hasConcept C140505726 @default.
- W3043936504 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W3043936504 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
- W3043936504 hasConcept C3017944768 @default.
- W3043936504 hasConcept C545542383 @default.
- W3043936504 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W3043936504 hasConcept C73484699 @default.
- W3043936504 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
- W3043936504 hasConceptScore W3043936504C140505726 @default.
- W3043936504 hasConceptScore W3043936504C15744967 @default.
- W3043936504 hasConceptScore W3043936504C166957645 @default.
- W3043936504 hasConceptScore W3043936504C3017944768 @default.
- W3043936504 hasConceptScore W3043936504C545542383 @default.
- W3043936504 hasConceptScore W3043936504C71924100 @default.
- W3043936504 hasConceptScore W3043936504C73484699 @default.
- W3043936504 hasConceptScore W3043936504C95457728 @default.
- W3043936504 hasFunder F4320337820 @default.
- W3043936504 hasLocation W30439365041 @default.
- W3043936504 hasLocation W30439365042 @default.
- W3043936504 hasOpenAccess W3043936504 @default.
- W3043936504 hasPrimaryLocation W30439365041 @default.
- W3043936504 hasRelatedWork W2486261318 @default.
- W3043936504 hasRelatedWork W2735002055 @default.
- W3043936504 hasRelatedWork W2736890868 @default.
- W3043936504 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
- W3043936504 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
- W3043936504 hasRelatedWork W3123737876 @default.
- W3043936504 hasRelatedWork W4226067212 @default.
- W3043936504 hasRelatedWork W4247666040 @default.
- W3043936504 hasRelatedWork W4285093207 @default.
- W3043936504 hasRelatedWork W4293557218 @default.
- W3043936504 hasVolume "315" @default.
- W3043936504 isParatext "false" @default.
- W3043936504 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W3043936504 magId "3043936504" @default.
- W3043936504 workType "article" @default.