Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3044547347> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 67 of
67
with 100 items per page.
- W3044547347 abstract "BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE:With the increasing rate of cesarean section, there is increasing awareness in ways to reduce the primary cesarean section rate. Failed induction being one of the causes of cesarean section, is associated with very many complications both maternal and fetal. By appropriate selection of candidates by an ideal method for induction of labour, these complications may be avoided. The traditionally used Bishop’s scoring system is highly subjective and associated with varying results. Hence is the need for a more objective method of preinduction cervical assessment.METHODOLOGY:150 nulliparous women admitted at Government Rajaji Hospital who were planned for induction of labour for various indications were selected in random. They were assessed by the obstetrician for obstetric examination and Bishop’s score estimation. The same set of patients were subjected to transvaginal sonography for assessing three parameters whichare actually few of the five components of Bishop’s score, cervical length, posterior cervical angle and percentage of funneling.The transvaginal sonographic parameters were measured and recorded. The outcome of the labour followed up. The induction- delivery interval noted down. If the induction delivery interval is more than 24 hours irrespective of the mode of delivery or if the mode of delivery was cesarean section irrespective of the induction delivery interval, the outcome is considered as failure.RESULTS:Among the 150 women, there is found to be a significant preinduction cervical assessment by Bishop’s score (p-value <0.05) as compared to transvaginal sonographic parameter with p-value < 0.001.Cervical length with a cutoff of 30mm has a sensitivity (86.07) and positive predictive value (88.24) better than Bishop’s score in preinduction cervical assessment. Posterior cervical angle is more specific than Bishop’s score evident by the ROC curve. Percentage of funneling is more sensitive(82), specific(82.14) and has a higher positive predictive value (92.54) than Bishop’s score.CONCLUSION:Transvaginal sonography is a more significant and objective method for preinduction cervical assessment. The parameters measured are cervical length, posterior cervical angle and percentage of funneling are also significant in preinduction cervical assessment. The comprehensive transvaginal score is more significant in preinduction cervical assessment than Bishop’s score.(p-value < 0.001)." @default.
- W3044547347 created "2020-07-29" @default.
- W3044547347 creator A5084811494 @default.
- W3044547347 date "2017-04-01" @default.
- W3044547347 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W3044547347 title "A Comparative study of Transvaginal Ultrasound and Bishop’s Score for Preinduction Cervical Assessment" @default.
- W3044547347 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
- W3044547347 type Work @default.
- W3044547347 sameAs 3044547347 @default.
- W3044547347 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W3044547347 crossrefType "dissertation" @default.
- W3044547347 hasAuthorship W3044547347A5084811494 @default.
- W3044547347 hasConcept C10885799 @default.
- W3044547347 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
- W3044547347 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W3044547347 hasConcept C131872663 @default.
- W3044547347 hasConcept C2776176026 @default.
- W3044547347 hasConcept C2777740455 @default.
- W3044547347 hasConcept C2779234561 @default.
- W3044547347 hasConcept C2779418813 @default.
- W3044547347 hasConcept C2780802667 @default.
- W3044547347 hasConcept C29456083 @default.
- W3044547347 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
- W3044547347 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
- W3044547347 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W3044547347 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W3044547347 hasConceptScore W3044547347C10885799 @default.
- W3044547347 hasConceptScore W3044547347C121608353 @default.
- W3044547347 hasConceptScore W3044547347C126322002 @default.
- W3044547347 hasConceptScore W3044547347C131872663 @default.
- W3044547347 hasConceptScore W3044547347C2776176026 @default.
- W3044547347 hasConceptScore W3044547347C2777740455 @default.
- W3044547347 hasConceptScore W3044547347C2779234561 @default.
- W3044547347 hasConceptScore W3044547347C2779418813 @default.
- W3044547347 hasConceptScore W3044547347C2780802667 @default.
- W3044547347 hasConceptScore W3044547347C29456083 @default.
- W3044547347 hasConceptScore W3044547347C44249647 @default.
- W3044547347 hasConceptScore W3044547347C54355233 @default.
- W3044547347 hasConceptScore W3044547347C71924100 @default.
- W3044547347 hasConceptScore W3044547347C86803240 @default.
- W3044547347 hasLocation W30445473471 @default.
- W3044547347 hasOpenAccess W3044547347 @default.
- W3044547347 hasPrimaryLocation W30445473471 @default.
- W3044547347 hasRelatedWork W1531522255 @default.
- W3044547347 hasRelatedWork W1954206557 @default.
- W3044547347 hasRelatedWork W1974970139 @default.
- W3044547347 hasRelatedWork W2009429482 @default.
- W3044547347 hasRelatedWork W2028879819 @default.
- W3044547347 hasRelatedWork W2125108970 @default.
- W3044547347 hasRelatedWork W2220145898 @default.
- W3044547347 hasRelatedWork W2326407053 @default.
- W3044547347 hasRelatedWork W2403316884 @default.
- W3044547347 hasRelatedWork W2587395612 @default.
- W3044547347 hasRelatedWork W2940974203 @default.
- W3044547347 hasRelatedWork W2969819376 @default.
- W3044547347 hasRelatedWork W3022246010 @default.
- W3044547347 hasRelatedWork W3023815520 @default.
- W3044547347 hasRelatedWork W3030248214 @default.
- W3044547347 hasRelatedWork W3082398132 @default.
- W3044547347 hasRelatedWork W3086045578 @default.
- W3044547347 hasRelatedWork W3118754560 @default.
- W3044547347 hasRelatedWork W3176181747 @default.
- W3044547347 hasRelatedWork W2257923929 @default.
- W3044547347 isParatext "false" @default.
- W3044547347 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W3044547347 magId "3044547347" @default.
- W3044547347 workType "dissertation" @default.