FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3046453891> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3046453891 endingPage "373" @default.
• W3046453891 startingPage "368" @default.
• W3046453891 abstract "Abstract Background The shared decision-making process between surgical providers and patients relies on a joint understanding about the risks of different treatment options based on a patient's individual health state. However, it is unclear whether a patient's perception of their own condition is congruent with the health state assigned by their surgical providers. This study was designed to compare provider assessment of frailty versus patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures of their own frailty status, physical function, and social activity level. Methods We prospectively assessed patients presenting to a vascular surgery clinic at an academic institution between May 2018 and June of 2019. Before clinic examination, patients completed PROs of their frailty status (Frail Non-Disabled survey), physical function (patient-reported outcome measurement information system [PROMIS] v1.2), and social activity level (PROMIS v2.0). Next, each patient's frailty status and overall health were scored by a surgical provider using the 9-point Clinical Frailty Scale, a validated frailty assessment tool that incorporates their functional status and level of activity. The correlation between the provider and PROs for frailty, physical function, and social activity was determined using the Spearman rank test, sensitivity/specificity tests, and receiver operating curves. Logistic regression models were used to predict 1-y mortality after assessment. Results A total of 118 patients were evaluated in clinic (50% male with mean age of 60 y), including 35 (30%) who were categorized as being frail by the surgical provider. In comparison, the same patients were much more likely to self-report as having low physical function (73%), being frail or disabled (79%), and/or unable to engage in social activities (78%). Although there was high sensitivity (89%) between a provider's and PROs for frailty, the specificity was low (26%) resulting in a receiver operating curve area of 0.57. Overall, there was low correlation between PROs for frailty (r = 0.16), physical function (r = 0.21), and social activities (r = 0.21) when compared with a provider's assessment of patient frailty. Models using PROs for frailty had better discrimination for predicting 1-y mortality (c-statistic: 0.72) than those using the Clinical Frailty Scale (c-statistic: 0.62). Conclusions Patients are more likely to self-report being frail, having low physical function, and limited social activity than what is detected by their surgical providers. These findings suggest that low levels of patient activity and its associated risk may often be underappreciated by surgical providers. Efforts are needed to improve how PROs are incorporated into surgical decision-making and outcome assessment." @default.
• W3046453891 created "2020-08-07" @default.
• W3046453891 creator A5000748895 @default.
• W3046453891 creator A5012443978 @default.
• W3046453891 creator A5052353091 @default.
• W3046453891 creator A5091327358 @default.
• W3046453891 date "2020-12-01" @default.
• W3046453891 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W3046453891 title "Patient-Surgeon Agreement in Assessment of Frailty, Physical Function, & Social Activity" @default.
• W3046453891 cites W1968268245 @default.
• W3046453891 cites W1986029006 @default.
• W3046453891 cites W2048301249 @default.
• W3046453891 cites W2096870505 @default.
• W3046453891 cites W2164186760 @default.
• W3046453891 cites W2195040438 @default.
• W3046453891 cites W2220772664 @default.
• W3046453891 cites W2573136390 @default.
• W3046453891 cites W2614069560 @default.
• W3046453891 cites W2739450594 @default.
• W3046453891 cites W2751874049 @default.
• W3046453891 cites W2802013984 @default.
• W3046453891 cites W2885569577 @default.
• W3046453891 cites W2887866880 @default.
• W3046453891 cites W2898411150 @default.
• W3046453891 cites W2921187536 @default.
• W3046453891 cites W2938587474 @default.
• W3046453891 cites W2948858784 @default.
• W3046453891 cites W4234432527 @default.
• W3046453891 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2020.06.059" @default.
• W3046453891 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32739620" @default.
• W3046453891 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3046453891 type Work @default.
• W3046453891 sameAs 3046453891 @default.
• W3046453891 citedByCount "7" @default.
• W3046453891 countsByYear W30464538912021 @default.
• W3046453891 countsByYear W30464538912022 @default.
• W3046453891 countsByYear W30464538912023 @default.
• W3046453891 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3046453891 hasAuthorship W3046453891A5000748895 @default.
• W3046453891 hasAuthorship W3046453891A5012443978 @default.
• W3046453891 hasAuthorship W3046453891A5052353091 @default.
• W3046453891 hasAuthorship W3046453891A5091327358 @default.
• W3046453891 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W3046453891 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3046453891 hasConcept C74909509 @default.
• W3046453891 hasConceptScore W3046453891C15744967 @default.
• W3046453891 hasConceptScore W3046453891C71924100 @default.
• W3046453891 hasConceptScore W3046453891C74909509 @default.
• W3046453891 hasLocation W30464538911 @default.
• W3046453891 hasOpenAccess W3046453891 @default.
• W3046453891 hasPrimaryLocation W30464538911 @default.
• W3046453891 hasRelatedWork W1506200166 @default.
• W3046453891 hasRelatedWork W2039318446 @default.
• W3046453891 hasRelatedWork W2048182022 @default.
• W3046453891 hasRelatedWork W2080531066 @default.
• W3046453891 hasRelatedWork W2604872355 @default.
• W3046453891 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W3046453891 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W3046453891 hasRelatedWork W2998699411 @default.
• W3046453891 hasRelatedWork W3032375762 @default.
• W3046453891 hasRelatedWork W3108674512 @default.
• W3046453891 hasVolume "256" @default.
• W3046453891 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3046453891 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3046453891 magId "3046453891" @default.
• W3046453891 workType "article" @default.