FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3046702169> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3046702169 endingPage "499" @default.
• W3046702169 startingPage "488" @default.
• W3046702169 abstract "Abstract Purpose Various alignment philosophies for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have been described, all striving to achieve excellent long-term implant survival and good functional outcomes. In recent years, in search of higher functionality and patient satisfaction, a shift towards more tailored and patient-specific alignment is seen. The purpose of this study was to describe a restricted ‘inverse kinematic alignment’ (iKA) technique, and to compare clinical outcomes of patients that underwent robotic-assisted TKA performed by restricted iKA vs. adjusted mechanical alignment (aMA). Methods The authors reviewed the records of a consecutive series of patients that received robotic-assisted TKA with restricted iKA ( n = 40) and with aMA ( n = 40). Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and satisfaction on a visual analogue scale (VAS) were collected at a follow-up of 12 months. Clinical outcomes were assessed according to patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) thresholds, and uni- and multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to determine associations of OKS and satisfaction with six variables (age, sex, body mass index (BMI), preoperative hip–knee–ankle (HKA) angle, preoperative OKS, alignment technique). Results The restricted iKA and aMA techniques yielded comparable outcome scores ( p = 0.069), with OKS, respectively, 44.6 ± 3.5 and 42.2 ± 6.3. VAS Satisfaction was better ( p = 0.012) with restricted iKA (9.2 ± 0.8) compared to aMA (8.5 ± 1.3). The number of patients that achieved OKS and satisfaction PASS thresholds was significantly higher ( p = 0.049 and p = 0.003, respectively) using restricted iKA (98% and 80%) compared to aMA (85% and 48%). Knees with preoperative varus deformity, achieved significantly ( p = 0.025) better OKS using restricted iKA (45.4 ± 2.0) compared to aMA (41.4 ± 6.8). Multivariable analyses confirmed better OKS ( β = 3.1; p = 0.007) and satisfaction ( β = 0.73; p = 0.005) with restricted iKA. Conclusions The results of this study suggest that restricted iKA and aMA grant comparable clinical outcomes at 12-month follow-up, though a greater proportion of knees operated by restricted iKA achieved the PASS thresholds for OKS and satisfaction. Notably. in knees with preoperative varus deformity, restricted iKA yielded significantly better OKS and satisfaction than aMA. Level of evidence Level III, comparative study." @default.
• W3046702169 created "2020-08-07" @default.
• W3046702169 creator A5006994323 @default.
• W3046702169 creator A5018704219 @default.
• W3046702169 creator A5046374414 @default.
• W3046702169 creator A5048714745 @default.
• W3046702169 creator A5052589443 @default.
• W3046702169 creator A5085856081 @default.
• W3046702169 creator A5087998954 @default.
• W3046702169 date "2020-07-31" @default.
• W3046702169 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W3046702169 title "Higher satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty using restricted inverse kinematic alignment compared to adjusted mechanical alignment" @default.
• W3046702169 cites W1660762953 @default.
• W3046702169 cites W1956974127 @default.
• W3046702169 cites W1968458941 @default.
• W3046702169 cites W1992375833 @default.
• W3046702169 cites W2063085086 @default.
• W3046702169 cites W2094759026 @default.
• W3046702169 cites W2117867342 @default.
• W3046702169 cites W2188187560 @default.
• W3046702169 cites W2343126763 @default.
• W3046702169 cites W2344867967 @default.
• W3046702169 cites W2413827586 @default.
• W3046702169 cites W2573215879 @default.
• W3046702169 cites W2589205321 @default.
• W3046702169 cites W2612546540 @default.
• W3046702169 cites W2751001276 @default.
• W3046702169 cites W2783180886 @default.
• W3046702169 cites W2862000181 @default.
• W3046702169 cites W2884554266 @default.
• W3046702169 cites W2890701767 @default.
• W3046702169 cites W2903794919 @default.
• W3046702169 cites W2918311723 @default.
• W3046702169 cites W2939022636 @default.
• W3046702169 cites W2939368615 @default.
• W3046702169 cites W2939716589 @default.
• W3046702169 cites W2997772588 @default.
• W3046702169 cites W4226084037 @default.
• W3046702169 cites W4245667197 @default.
• W3046702169 cites W4289777192 @default.
• W3046702169 doi "https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06165-4" @default.
• W3046702169 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32737528" @default.
• W3046702169 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3046702169 type Work @default.
• W3046702169 sameAs 3046702169 @default.
• W3046702169 citedByCount "55" @default.
• W3046702169 countsByYear W30467021692020 @default.
• W3046702169 countsByYear W30467021692021 @default.
• W3046702169 countsByYear W30467021692022 @default.
• W3046702169 countsByYear W30467021692023 @default.
• W3046702169 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3046702169 hasAuthorship W3046702169A5006994323 @default.
• W3046702169 hasAuthorship W3046702169A5018704219 @default.
• W3046702169 hasAuthorship W3046702169A5046374414 @default.
• W3046702169 hasAuthorship W3046702169A5048714745 @default.
• W3046702169 hasAuthorship W3046702169A5052589443 @default.
• W3046702169 hasAuthorship W3046702169A5085856081 @default.
• W3046702169 hasAuthorship W3046702169A5087998954 @default.
• W3046702169 hasBestOaLocation W30467021691 @default.
• W3046702169 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3046702169 hasConcept C14184104 @default.
• W3046702169 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W3046702169 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W3046702169 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W3046702169 hasConcept C2775944032 @default.
• W3046702169 hasConcept C2776164576 @default.
• W3046702169 hasConcept C2778336525 @default.
• W3046702169 hasConcept C2780463824 @default.
• W3046702169 hasConcept C3017871827 @default.
• W3046702169 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3046702169 hasConceptScore W3046702169C141071460 @default.
• W3046702169 hasConceptScore W3046702169C14184104 @default.
• W3046702169 hasConceptScore W3046702169C142724271 @default.
• W3046702169 hasConceptScore W3046702169C1862650 @default.
• W3046702169 hasConceptScore W3046702169C204787440 @default.
• W3046702169 hasConceptScore W3046702169C2775944032 @default.
• W3046702169 hasConceptScore W3046702169C2776164576 @default.
• W3046702169 hasConceptScore W3046702169C2778336525 @default.
• W3046702169 hasConceptScore W3046702169C2780463824 @default.
• W3046702169 hasConceptScore W3046702169C3017871827 @default.
• W3046702169 hasConceptScore W3046702169C71924100 @default.
• W3046702169 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W3046702169 hasLocation W30467021691 @default.
• W3046702169 hasLocation W30467021692 @default.
• W3046702169 hasLocation W30467021693 @default.
• W3046702169 hasLocation W30467021694 @default.
• W3046702169 hasOpenAccess W3046702169 @default.
• W3046702169 hasPrimaryLocation W30467021691 @default.
• W3046702169 hasRelatedWork W1554066578 @default.
• W3046702169 hasRelatedWork W2019477387 @default.
• W3046702169 hasRelatedWork W2107445259 @default.
• W3046702169 hasRelatedWork W2562238632 @default.
• W3046702169 hasRelatedWork W2603074218 @default.
• W3046702169 hasRelatedWork W2792471160 @default.
• W3046702169 hasRelatedWork W3039550105 @default.
• W3046702169 hasRelatedWork W4223486329 @default.
• W3046702169 hasRelatedWork W4254714024 @default.
• W3046702169 hasRelatedWork W4372319453 @default.

• next