FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3047541612> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3047541612 abstract "Abstract Background Psychological resilience and coping strategies have been found to be related to various psychological and mental health problems. Evaluations of the relationship between resilience and coping style among university students are important for developing effective health promotion strategies focused on resilience intervention to benefit students’ health and well-being. The relationship between psychological resilience and coping styles has usually been examined among adults and patients. Very few studies have investigated the relationship between resilience and coping style in university students. The present study aimed to investigate the associations between psychological resilience, students’ characteristics (gender, major and grade) and coping styles among undergraduate students. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted among undergraduate students in Shandong Province, China. Undergraduate students were randomly selected from 6 universities in 3 cities of the province using a stratified random sampling method. The questionnaire included questions on the participants’ demographic information, including gender, grade and major, measures of psychological resilience and coping style. Coping style was measured by the Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire (SCSQ). The Asian Resilience Scale (ARS) was applied to evaluate undergraduates’ psychological resilience. Multivariable regression analysis was used to examine the relationships between resilience, students’ characteristics and positive coping styles. Results A sample of 1743 undergraduates was analysed. The mean psychological resilience score was 70.41. The mean score for positive coping style was 24.72. Multiple regression analysis showed that three factors of psychological resilience, mood control, self-plasticity and coping flexibility, were all significant factors for positive coping styles (regression coefficient = 0.34, 0.35, 0.14, p < 0.01 for the three factors, respectively). Medical students and females had higher scores for positive coping styles than non-medical students and males ( p < 0.01). Conclusions The research revealed that females and medical students are more likely than males and non-medical students to adopt positive coping styles. Higher psychological resilience is associated with a better positive coping style. The findings suggest that psychological education and health promotion programmes that target strengthening psychological resilience among undergraduate students may help foster positive coping styles to benefit their mental health and psychological well-being." @default.
• W3047541612 created "2020-08-10" @default.
• W3047541612 creator A5004400621 @default.
• W3047541612 creator A5018863416 @default.
• W3047541612 creator A5025498787 @default.
• W3047541612 creator A5030514870 @default.
• W3047541612 creator A5044554353 @default.
• W3047541612 creator A5078837433 @default.
• W3047541612 date "2020-08-06" @default.
• W3047541612 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W3047541612 title "Psychological resilience and positive coping styles among Chinese undergraduate students: a cross-sectional study" @default.
• W3047541612 cites W1851719791 @default.
• W3047541612 cites W1966828258 @default.
• W3047541612 cites W1970523612 @default.
• W3047541612 cites W1971390601 @default.
• W3047541612 cites W1982697601 @default.
• W3047541612 cites W1986804516 @default.
• W3047541612 cites W2000861953 @default.
• W3047541612 cites W2006860760 @default.
• W3047541612 cites W2012594296 @default.
• W3047541612 cites W2022040105 @default.
• W3047541612 cites W2022240602 @default.
• W3047541612 cites W2024627557 @default.
• W3047541612 cites W2028338387 @default.
• W3047541612 cites W2055117710 @default.
• W3047541612 cites W2055137555 @default.
• W3047541612 cites W2070199160 @default.
• W3047541612 cites W2077384252 @default.
• W3047541612 cites W2107982936 @default.
• W3047541612 cites W2108593116 @default.
• W3047541612 cites W2118185372 @default.
• W3047541612 cites W2126121629 @default.
• W3047541612 cites W2151685371 @default.
• W3047541612 cites W2151772574 @default.
• W3047541612 cites W2159024401 @default.
• W3047541612 cites W2162009420 @default.
• W3047541612 cites W2162042436 @default.
• W3047541612 cites W2336738582 @default.
• W3047541612 cites W2611741519 @default.
• W3047541612 cites W2612069237 @default.
• W3047541612 cites W2740187414 @default.
• W3047541612 cites W2766875312 @default.
• W3047541612 cites W2767358368 @default.
• W3047541612 cites W2770630681 @default.
• W3047541612 cites W2781521478 @default.
• W3047541612 cites W2784218193 @default.
• W3047541612 cites W2792606062 @default.
• W3047541612 cites W2797340412 @default.
• W3047541612 cites W2822449897 @default.
• W3047541612 cites W2884755236 @default.
• W3047541612 cites W2888581464 @default.
• W3047541612 cites W2891230948 @default.
• W3047541612 cites W2891801059 @default.
• W3047541612 cites W2898468789 @default.
• W3047541612 cites W2946807779 @default.
• W3047541612 cites W2967729334 @default.
• W3047541612 cites W2971362365 @default.
• W3047541612 cites W4292948928 @default.
• W3047541612 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-020-00444-y" @default.
• W3047541612 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/7406959" @default.
• W3047541612 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32762769" @default.
• W3047541612 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3047541612 type Work @default.
• W3047541612 sameAs 3047541612 @default.
• W3047541612 citedByCount "57" @default.
• W3047541612 countsByYear W30475416122020 @default.
• W3047541612 countsByYear W30475416122021 @default.
• W3047541612 countsByYear W30475416122022 @default.
• W3047541612 countsByYear W30475416122023 @default.
• W3047541612 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3047541612 hasAuthorship W3047541612A5004400621 @default.
• W3047541612 hasAuthorship W3047541612A5018863416 @default.
• W3047541612 hasAuthorship W3047541612A5025498787 @default.
• W3047541612 hasAuthorship W3047541612A5030514870 @default.
• W3047541612 hasAuthorship W3047541612A5044554353 @default.
• W3047541612 hasAuthorship W3047541612A5078837433 @default.
• W3047541612 hasBestOaLocation W30475416121 @default.
• W3047541612 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W3047541612 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
• W3047541612 hasConcept C134362201 @default.
• W3047541612 hasConcept C142052008 @default.
• W3047541612 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W3047541612 hasConcept C152877465 @default.
• W3047541612 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W3047541612 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W3047541612 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W3047541612 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W3047541612 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3047541612 hasConcept C73282008 @default.
• W3047541612 hasConceptScore W3047541612C118552586 @default.
• W3047541612 hasConceptScore W3047541612C119857082 @default.
• W3047541612 hasConceptScore W3047541612C134362201 @default.
• W3047541612 hasConceptScore W3047541612C142052008 @default.
• W3047541612 hasConceptScore W3047541612C142724271 @default.
• W3047541612 hasConceptScore W3047541612C152877465 @default.
• W3047541612 hasConceptScore W3047541612C15744967 @default.
• W3047541612 hasConceptScore W3047541612C27415008 @default.
• W3047541612 hasConceptScore W3047541612C41008148 @default.
• W3047541612 hasConceptScore W3047541612C70410870 @default.
• W3047541612 hasConceptScore W3047541612C71924100 @default.

• next