FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3048241914> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3048241914 endingPage "1567" @default.
• W3048241914 startingPage "1566" @default.
• W3048241914 abstract "Adherence to infection prevention and control (IPAC) measures is challenging for health care workers (HCW) in nonoutbreak settings. Now more than ever, during the current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, it is imperative that HCW strictly adhere to IPAC measures to prevent both the nosocomial transmission of infection and self-contamination and infection. System-level interventions that incorporate human factor engineering will provide the most robust means of ensuring best IPAC practices, especially as it relates to the appropriate use of personal protective equipment (PPE). A resident is rounding with their attending physician on a ward dedicated to the care of patients with COVID-19. The attending physician completes a clinical assessment and moves to exit the room. While removing their gown and gloves, the attending physician starts to discuss the management of the patient. Without performing hand hygiene, the attending reaches to remove their face shield and mask. The resident notices this impending breach in infection control measures but hesitates to alert the attending physician while they are still speaking. What should the resident do? Escalation of care involves prompt recognition of deterioration in a patient's clinical status, and timely communication of concerns to the care team.1Cotter JM Ziniel S Lockwood J et al.Care escalation: teaching residents how to effectively communicate patient care concerns.MedEdPORTAL. 2019; 15: 10833Crossref PubMed Scopus (3) Google Scholar,2Johnston M Arora S King D et al.A systematic review to identify the factors that affect failure to rescue and escalation of care in surgery.Surgery. 2015; 157: 752-763Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (155) Google Scholar In some circumstances, this may require junior trainees to speak to up to those more senior. Communication failure has been recognized to cause sentinel events and delayed escalation can lead to safety issues resulting in significant morbidity and mortality for patients.3Baker GR Norton PG Flintoft V et al.The Canadian adverse events study: the incidence of adverse events among hospital patients in Canada.CMAJ. 2004; 170: 1678-1686Crossref PubMed Scopus (1557) Google Scholar Regarding IPAC measures, this may also result in harm to HCW. The ability of HCW, including trainees, to feel empowered and comfortable to raise concerns is central to creating a culture of safety, and improved quality of care. Escalation of care can be negatively and positively influenced by organizational and interpersonal factors.2Johnston M Arora S King D et al.A systematic review to identify the factors that affect failure to rescue and escalation of care in surgery.Surgery. 2015; 157: 752-763Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (155) Google Scholar Interpersonal factors include traditional hierarchical structures, fear of appearing incompetent, and desire for autonomy by junior members of the team.1Cotter JM Ziniel S Lockwood J et al.Care escalation: teaching residents how to effectively communicate patient care concerns.MedEdPORTAL. 2019; 15: 10833Crossref PubMed Scopus (3) Google Scholar,2Johnston M Arora S King D et al.A systematic review to identify the factors that affect failure to rescue and escalation of care in surgery.Surgery. 2015; 157: 752-763Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (155) Google Scholar,4Callaghan A Kinsman L Cooper S et al.The factors that influence junior doctors' capacity to recognise, respond and manage patient deterioration in an acute ward wetting: an integrative review.Aust Crit Care. 2017; 30: 197-209Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (21) Google Scholar Communication across hierarchies can be challenging. Resident physicians may be reluctant to alert attending physicians to safety concerns, as the attending physician may be in a position to have a direct influence on the resident's future career. We believe that spotting for appropriate PPE use is critical to prevent the nosocomial transmission of COVID-19 related to breaches in donning and doffing.5Houghton C Meskell P Delaney H et al.Barriers and facilitators to healthcare workers’ adherence with infection prevention and control (IPC) guidelines for respiratory infectious diseases: a rapid qualitative evidence synthesis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020; (Art. No.: CD013582)PubMed Google Scholar This can be fit into a care escalation framework that includes speaking up about observed lapses in the technique of others. Lapses in infection control measures must be immediately recognized and communicated to prevent both self-contamination and the nosocomial spread of infection. If the safety climate is complacent, we believe this will translate to lower adherence to IPAC guidelines and its resultant consequences. At a local academic and community institution, recent baseline adherence to PPE protocols were found to be only 56%.6Williams VR Leis JA Trbovich P et al.Improving healthcare worker adherence to the use of transmission-based precautions through application of human factors design: a prospective multi-centre study.J Hosp Infect. 2019; 103: 101-105Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (14) Google Scholar Addressing lapses in IPAC measures, in outbreak and nonoutbreak settings, represents opportunities for improvement aimed at increasing workplace safety. Like many institutions, we decided to geographically cohort patients with COVID-19 on dedicated units. We have adopted a model where 2 physicians are buddied for patient care. This was designed to allow for specific task delegation to improve efficiency, to support optimal IPAC practices, and to reduce cognitive fatigue.7Bérastégui P Jaspa M Ghuysen A et al.Fatigue-related risk management in the emergency department: a focus group study.Intern Emerg Med. 2018; 13: 1273-1281Crossref PubMed Scopus (13) Google Scholar One physician performs patient assessments (the assessor) while the other reviews laboratory investigations, performs computer order entry, and completes chart documentation outside of the room. As the assessor moves between patient rooms, the second physician acts as the spotter for the donning and doffing of PPE. A strong safety climate is positively reinforced by effective communications between members of the health care team and frequent safety-related feedback.5Houghton C Meskell P Delaney H et al.Barriers and facilitators to healthcare workers’ adherence with infection prevention and control (IPC) guidelines for respiratory infectious diseases: a rapid qualitative evidence synthesis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020; (Art. No.: CD013582)PubMed Google Scholar Strategies to improve upon these interpersonal factors have been studied. They include fostering a safe environment to promote communication across hierarchies by making expectations clear, setting expectations early, standardization of communication, and practice of these skills in a safe environment, such as in simulation.1Cotter JM Ziniel S Lockwood J et al.Care escalation: teaching residents how to effectively communicate patient care concerns.MedEdPORTAL. 2019; 15: 10833Crossref PubMed Scopus (3) Google Scholar,2Johnston M Arora S King D et al.A systematic review to identify the factors that affect failure to rescue and escalation of care in surgery.Surgery. 2015; 157: 752-763Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (155) Google Scholar,4Callaghan A Kinsman L Cooper S et al.The factors that influence junior doctors' capacity to recognise, respond and manage patient deterioration in an acute ward wetting: an integrative review.Aust Crit Care. 2017; 30: 197-209Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (21) Google Scholar Improving patient safety, including adherence to IPAC measures, requires a culture of mutual respect, accountability, and commitment to improvement. This must be reflected in the learning environment, and role modeled by those more senior. Care escalation relies on effective communication. In this scenario, the attending physician was observed to be making an error while doffing their PPE. The attending physician's discussion of the management plan while doffing may have led to distraction that resulted in this error. The resident physician should have felt empowered to speak up and alert the attending physician without hesitation. Applying the principles of care escalation, we provide some examples in which this lapse in doffing of PPE could have been addressed both prior to rounding and in the moment in which it occurred. These are summarized in the Table 1.Table 1Care escalation strategies for donning and doffing procedureDonning and doffingActionExample safety statementsPrior to roundingAssign roles, including the clinical assessor and the personal protective equipment (PPE) spotter. This sets expectations and provides role clarity.Both physicians: “When we round today, let's agree that during donning and doffing, that no other tasks will be completed so that we can maintain our focus.”PredonningReview tasks that need to be completed inside the patient's room before the assessor pauses to don PPE. Signal this with a safety statement.Assessor: “Please spot me when I'm donning my PPE. Do not hesitate to correct errors to ensure my safety and the safety of our team.”DonningEmploy silence during application of PPE to ensure the assessor focuses on the task and the spotter actively observes.Assessor: “I have now put on my PPE. Am I safe to enter the patient's room?”PredoffingAssessor announces exit from patient's room. This cues the spotter to observe the doffing of PPE and to be alert for lapses to create situational awareness.Assessor: “All eyes on me. I am leaving the patient's room and I will be removing my PPE.”DoffingAssessor focuses on the task of doffing while the spotter actively observes. If focus is broken, or an impending error occurs, use a safety statement for correction.Spotter: “Stop! You are about to touch your face. Please perform hand hygiene before removing your mask”.After patient assessmentDebrief any safety issues and lapses in infection control procedures. This normalizes the shared responsibility for safety.Spotter: “You were speaking while you were doffing your PPE. I believe this lead to your distraction and subconscious attempt to touch your face. Let's agree that we will remain silent during doffing so that you can focus on removal of PPE while I spot you.” Open table in a new tab We believe that in creating role clarity and accountabilities for both members of the team, and through the creation of scripted responses to observed lapses in infection control measures, that it is possible to improve safety in the donning and doffing process. These scripts can also be used for role-play in educational sessions including simulations. Now, more than ever, members of the health care team must be comfortable identifying breaches in infection control protocols and speaking up in order to improve provider and workplace safety." @default.
• W3048241914 created "2020-08-13" @default.
• W3048241914 creator A5024406213 @default.
• W3048241914 creator A5075125906 @default.
• W3048241914 creator A5076251218 @default.
• W3048241914 date "2020-12-01" @default.
• W3048241914 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
• W3048241914 title "A care escalation framework to address lapses in donning and doffing of personal protective equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic" @default.
• W3048241914 cites W1979968457 @default.
• W3048241914 cites W2138784405 @default.
• W3048241914 cites W2530409701 @default.
• W3048241914 cites W2804841066 @default.
• W3048241914 cites W2934142552 @default.
• W3048241914 cites W2970861181 @default.
• W3048241914 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2020.07.040" @default.
• W3048241914 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/7409734" @default.
• W3048241914 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32771497" @default.
• W3048241914 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3048241914 type Work @default.
• W3048241914 sameAs 3048241914 @default.
• W3048241914 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W3048241914 countsByYear W30482419142021 @default.
• W3048241914 countsByYear W30482419142022 @default.
• W3048241914 countsByYear W30482419142023 @default.
• W3048241914 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3048241914 hasAuthorship W3048241914A5024406213 @default.
• W3048241914 hasAuthorship W3048241914A5075125906 @default.
• W3048241914 hasAuthorship W3048241914A5076251218 @default.
• W3048241914 hasBestOaLocation W30482419141 @default.
• W3048241914 hasConcept C116675565 @default.
• W3048241914 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3048241914 hasConcept C159047783 @default.
• W3048241914 hasConcept C177713679 @default.
• W3048241914 hasConcept C2776056953 @default.
• W3048241914 hasConcept C2779134260 @default.
• W3048241914 hasConcept C2780668467 @default.
• W3048241914 hasConcept C3006700255 @default.
• W3048241914 hasConcept C3007834351 @default.
• W3048241914 hasConcept C3008058167 @default.
• W3048241914 hasConcept C524204448 @default.
• W3048241914 hasConcept C545542383 @default.
• W3048241914 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3048241914 hasConcept C89623803 @default.
• W3048241914 hasConceptScore W3048241914C116675565 @default.
• W3048241914 hasConceptScore W3048241914C126322002 @default.
• W3048241914 hasConceptScore W3048241914C159047783 @default.
• W3048241914 hasConceptScore W3048241914C177713679 @default.
• W3048241914 hasConceptScore W3048241914C2776056953 @default.
• W3048241914 hasConceptScore W3048241914C2779134260 @default.
• W3048241914 hasConceptScore W3048241914C2780668467 @default.
• W3048241914 hasConceptScore W3048241914C3006700255 @default.
• W3048241914 hasConceptScore W3048241914C3007834351 @default.
• W3048241914 hasConceptScore W3048241914C3008058167 @default.
• W3048241914 hasConceptScore W3048241914C524204448 @default.
• W3048241914 hasConceptScore W3048241914C545542383 @default.
• W3048241914 hasConceptScore W3048241914C71924100 @default.
• W3048241914 hasConceptScore W3048241914C89623803 @default.
• W3048241914 hasIssue "12" @default.
• W3048241914 hasLocation W30482419141 @default.
• W3048241914 hasLocation W30482419142 @default.
• W3048241914 hasLocation W30482419143 @default.
• W3048241914 hasOpenAccess W3048241914 @default.
• W3048241914 hasPrimaryLocation W30482419141 @default.
• W3048241914 hasRelatedWork W3014560708 @default.
• W3048241914 hasRelatedWork W3025176011 @default.
• W3048241914 hasRelatedWork W3032320397 @default.
• W3048241914 hasRelatedWork W3035060041 @default.
• W3048241914 hasRelatedWork W3036410070 @default.
• W3048241914 hasRelatedWork W3048464972 @default.
• W3048241914 hasRelatedWork W3198269889 @default.
• W3048241914 hasRelatedWork W4280491013 @default.
• W3048241914 hasRelatedWork W4295256002 @default.
• W3048241914 hasRelatedWork W4308017287 @default.
• W3048241914 hasVolume "48" @default.
• W3048241914 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3048241914 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3048241914 magId "3048241914" @default.
• W3048241914 workType "article" @default.