FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3048271752> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3048271752 abstract "This research aimed to determine which fingermark processes are most efficient at developing latent marks on internal walls that have been painted. At present there is a deficiency in the quality and quantity of fingermarks being recovered from such substrates by practitioners working in the field. This issue is amplified by a lack of published research in this area. Therefore, this in-depth study sought to address some of the key challenges faced by practitioners and fill the void of knowledge in this specific area.Various methodologies were employed to undertake this research, beginning with a survey of practitioners to gauge the current practices in use across the UK. This assisted in determining the most commonly used processes to develop latent fingermarks on painted walls and the types of scenes in which painted walls are likely to be investigated. The detail gained from the questionnaire then informed the design of the experimental work carried out within this research. The experimental work consisted of numerous smaller studies to tackle specific research questions, exploring variations of paint types and brands to ascertain if these have an effect on deposited fingermarks from different donors, and establishing the primary differences between paint types and categorising these into coherent groups. The results from these studies then assisted in constructing the final set of methodologies investigating which processes are most effective at developing fingermarks on different paint types.The results from this research highlighted that practitioners do not always consider the texture or composition of a painted wall before attempting to develop latent fingermarks. In addition to this, practitioners do not generally follow the published guidelines from the Home Office Centre for Applied Science and Technology (now DSTL). The findings from the experimental work revealed that there is a distinct difference between matt paints and other non-matt paints (such as silk and bathroom paint) and therefore they should be processed differently by practitioners. The most effective treatment for matt painted walls is cyanoacrylate vapour (dyed with basic yellow 40), whereas the most efficient process for non-matt painted walls is black magnetic granular powder.This research culminated in a proposed set of guidelines designed for fingermark practitioners to assist them in creating fingermark recovery strategies. The guidelines have been constructed upon rigorous scientific evidence and should significantly increase the quality and quantity of latent fingermarks being developed ‘in situ’ on painted walls." @default.
• W3048271752 created "2020-08-13" @default.
• W3048271752 creator A5013835942 @default.
• W3048271752 date "2019-01-01" @default.
• W3048271752 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W3048271752 title "The development of latent fingermarks on painted walls" @default.
• W3048271752 cites W1164102756 @default.
• W3048271752 cites W126013359 @default.
• W3048271752 cites W1569758561 @default.
• W3048271752 cites W1571158485 @default.
• W3048271752 cites W1578444694 @default.
• W3048271752 cites W1949236878 @default.
• W3048271752 cites W1966954983 @default.
• W3048271752 cites W1978536037 @default.
• W3048271752 cites W1984903436 @default.
• W3048271752 cites W1991388494 @default.
• W3048271752 cites W2019838795 @default.
• W3048271752 cites W2027566309 @default.
• W3048271752 cites W2032917167 @default.
• W3048271752 cites W2033848250 @default.
• W3048271752 cites W2038818238 @default.
• W3048271752 cites W2054477605 @default.
• W3048271752 cites W2058375134 @default.
• W3048271752 cites W2061960402 @default.
• W3048271752 cites W2062467288 @default.
• W3048271752 cites W2064735180 @default.
• W3048271752 cites W2073960517 @default.
• W3048271752 cites W2079970593 @default.
• W3048271752 cites W2093543586 @default.
• W3048271752 cites W2099082989 @default.
• W3048271752 cites W2123823174 @default.
• W3048271752 cites W2133442092 @default.
• W3048271752 cites W2147603181 @default.
• W3048271752 cites W2166828564 @default.
• W3048271752 cites W2283628443 @default.
• W3048271752 cites W2293865078 @default.
• W3048271752 cites W2414248311 @default.
• W3048271752 cites W2485993478 @default.
• W3048271752 cites W2489453687 @default.
• W3048271752 cites W2490009620 @default.
• W3048271752 cites W2497645301 @default.
• W3048271752 cites W2796248863 @default.
• W3048271752 cites W2809169272 @default.
• W3048271752 cites W3115192425 @default.
• W3048271752 cites W33949104 @default.
• W3048271752 cites W801993795 @default.
• W3048271752 cites W2294490640 @default.
• W3048271752 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W3048271752 type Work @default.
• W3048271752 sameAs 3048271752 @default.
• W3048271752 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3048271752 crossrefType "dissertation" @default.
• W3048271752 hasAuthorship W3048271752A5013835942 @default.
• W3048271752 hasConcept C2522767166 @default.
• W3048271752 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W3048271752 hasConceptScore W3048271752C2522767166 @default.
• W3048271752 hasConceptScore W3048271752C41008148 @default.
• W3048271752 hasLocation W30482717521 @default.
• W3048271752 hasOpenAccess W3048271752 @default.
• W3048271752 hasPrimaryLocation W30482717521 @default.
• W3048271752 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3048271752 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3048271752 magId "3048271752" @default.
• W3048271752 workType "dissertation" @default.