FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3048281644> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3048281644 abstract "This essay begins with an acknowledgment that attempts to understand Brexit are, at this stage, condemned to partial understanding, at best, because as an event it is incomplete and moving in contradictory directions. Just a brief inventory of the many ways in which Brexit can be, and has been, approached gives one a sense of this centrifugalism – sovereignty; globalization; free trade; immigration; racism; disenfranchisement; nostalgia; affect; generational schism; post-imperial decline; neoliberalism; populism; poverty; austerity; class; multiculturalism; cosmopolitanism; far-right and Islamist extremism; Islam and Muslims; refugees; and so on and so on. One particular line of thought emerging among more scholarly treatments from within the arts and humanities (for example, as found in several essays in the volume Brexit and Literature) concerns itself with Brexit as an affective phenomenon, one that speaks to the structures of feeling that bind ‘Britishness’ into a cultural assemblage that goes beyond the artefactual sense of ‘culture’ to that nebulous and barely perceptible ‘way of life’ which constitutes the affective economy of most people living in the British Isles. This, however, is articulated – in the sense used by Stuart Hall – in very different ways depending on class, gender, region, educational background, nationality and, of course, race and ethnicity. This essay will probe the ways in which the affective economy of Brexit is mobilized by picking out one particular thread from within the tangled knot of multiple determinations that have brought the United Kingdom to where it now is: this thread follows the trope of (de)colonization across Brexit rhetorics and places it within a long duree that illuminates the extent to which the affective economy underlying Brexit is deeply embedded in a racialized sense of nationhood that reaches back to the beginnings of Britain’s colonial and thence post-colonial history." @default.
• W3048281644 created "2020-08-13" @default.
• W3048281644 creator A5081304864 @default.
• W3048281644 date "2020-01-01" @default.
• W3048281644 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W3048281644 title "REFLECTIONS ON THE RHETORIC OF (DE)COLONIZATION IN BREXIT DISCOURSE" @default.
• W3048281644 cites W136336957 @default.
• W3048281644 cites W1482050289 @default.
• W3048281644 cites W1493129227 @default.
• W3048281644 cites W1499410609 @default.
• W3048281644 cites W1510113079 @default.
• W3048281644 cites W1558359436 @default.
• W3048281644 cites W17059387 @default.
• W3048281644 cites W1973051082 @default.
• W3048281644 cites W2047656735 @default.
• W3048281644 cites W2067562289 @default.
• W3048281644 cites W2295249580 @default.
• W3048281644 cites W2483950667 @default.
• W3048281644 cites W2561416026 @default.
• W3048281644 cites W2806137434 @default.
• W3048281644 cites W2904379595 @default.
• W3048281644 cites W2963483268 @default.
• W3048281644 cites W3043893028 @default.
• W3048281644 doi "https://doi.org/10.5456/issn.2050-3679/2020s04" @default.
• W3048281644 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3048281644 type Work @default.
• W3048281644 sameAs 3048281644 @default.
• W3048281644 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3048281644 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3048281644 hasAuthorship W3048281644A5081304864 @default.
• W3048281644 hasBestOaLocation W30482816441 @default.
• W3048281644 hasConcept C1370556 @default.
• W3048281644 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W3048281644 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W3048281644 hasConcept C155202549 @default.
• W3048281644 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W3048281644 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W3048281644 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3048281644 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W3048281644 hasConcept C2776469822 @default.
• W3048281644 hasConcept C2776927270 @default.
• W3048281644 hasConcept C2910001868 @default.
• W3048281644 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W3048281644 hasConceptScore W3048281644C1370556 @default.
• W3048281644 hasConceptScore W3048281644C138885662 @default.
• W3048281644 hasConceptScore W3048281644C144024400 @default.
• W3048281644 hasConceptScore W3048281644C155202549 @default.
• W3048281644 hasConceptScore W3048281644C162324750 @default.
• W3048281644 hasConceptScore W3048281644C166957645 @default.
• W3048281644 hasConceptScore W3048281644C17744445 @default.
• W3048281644 hasConceptScore W3048281644C205649164 @default.
• W3048281644 hasConceptScore W3048281644C2776469822 @default.
• W3048281644 hasConceptScore W3048281644C2776927270 @default.
• W3048281644 hasConceptScore W3048281644C2910001868 @default.
• W3048281644 hasConceptScore W3048281644C41895202 @default.
• W3048281644 hasIssue "8" @default.
• W3048281644 hasLocation W30482816441 @default.
• W3048281644 hasLocation W30482816442 @default.
• W3048281644 hasOpenAccess W3048281644 @default.
• W3048281644 hasPrimaryLocation W30482816441 @default.
• W3048281644 hasRelatedWork W1996276435 @default.
• W3048281644 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W3048281644 hasRelatedWork W2887621571 @default.
• W3048281644 hasRelatedWork W2890689967 @default.
• W3048281644 hasRelatedWork W2944916657 @default.
• W3048281644 hasRelatedWork W2962419919 @default.
• W3048281644 hasRelatedWork W3045917843 @default.
• W3048281644 hasRelatedWork W3173619651 @default.
• W3048281644 hasRelatedWork W3188040483 @default.
• W3048281644 hasRelatedWork W2125068414 @default.
• W3048281644 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3048281644 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3048281644 magId "3048281644" @default.
• W3048281644 workType "article" @default.