FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3048386487> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3048386487 endingPage "2808" @default.
• W3048386487 startingPage "2801" @default.
• W3048386487 abstract "Abstract Background Gap and stepoff values in the treatment of acetabular fractures are correlated with clinical outcomes. However, the interobserver and intraobserver variability of gap and stepoff measurements for all imaging modalities in the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative phase of treatment is unknown. Recently, a standardized CT-based measurement method was introduced, which provided the opportunity to assess the level of variability. Questions/purposes (1) In patients with acetabular fractures, what is the interobserver variability in the measurement of the fracture gaps and articular stepoffs determined by each observer to be the maximum one in the weightbearing dome, as measured on pre- and postoperative pelvic radiographs, intraoperative fluoroscopy, and pre- and postoperative CT scans? (2) What is the intraobserver variability in these measurements? Methods Sixty patients with a complete subset of pre-, intra- and postoperative high-quality images (CT slices of < 2 mm), representing a variety of fracture types with small and large gaps and/or stepoffs, were included. A total of 196 patients with nonoperative treatment (n = 117), inadequate available imaging (n = 60), skeletal immaturity (n = 16), bilateral fractures (n = 2) or a primary THA (n = 1) were excluded. The maximum gap and stepoff values in the weightbearing dome were digitally measured on pelvic radiographs and CT images by five independent observers. Observers were free to decide which gap and/or stepoff they considered the maximum and then measure these before and after surgery. The observers were two trauma surgeons with more than 5 years of experience in pelvic surgery, two trauma surgeons with less than 5 years of experience in pelvic surgery, and one surgical resident. Additionally, the final intraoperative fluoroscopy images were assessed for the presence of a gap or stepoff in the weightbearing dome. All observers used the same standardized measurement technique and each observer measured the first five patients together with the responsible researcher. For 10 randomly selected patients, all measurements were repeated by all observers, at least 2 weeks after the initial measurements. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for pelvic radiographs and CT images and the kappa value for intraoperative fluoroscopy measurements were calculated to determine the inter- and intraobserver variability. Interobserver variability was defined as the difference in the measurements between observers. Intraobserver variability was defined as the difference in repeated measurements by the same observer. Results Preoperatively, the interobserver ICC was 0.4 (gap and stepoff) on radiographs and 0.4 (gap) and 0.3 (stepoff) on CT images. The observers agreed on the indication for surgery in 40% (gap) and 30% (stepoff) on pelvic radiographs. For CT scans the observers agreed in 95% (gap) and 70% (stepoff) of images. Postoperatively, the interobserver ICC was 0.4 (gap) and 0.2 (stepoff) on radiographs. The observers agreed on whether the reduction was acceptable or not in 60% (gap) and 40% (stepoff). On CT images the ICC was 0.3 (gap) and 0.4 (stepoff). The observers agreed on whether the reduction was acceptable in 35% (gap) and 38% (stepoff). The preoperative intraobserver ICC was 0.6 (gap and stepoff) on pelvic radiographs and 0.4 (gap) and 0.6 (stepoff) for CT scans. Postoperatively, the intraobserver ICC was 0.7 (gap) and 0.1 (stepoff) on pelvic radiographs. On CT the intraobserver ICC was 0.5 (gap) and 0.3 (stepoff). There was no agreement between the observers on the presence of a gap or stepoff on intraoperative fluoroscopy images (kappa -0.1 to 0.2). Conclusions We found an insufficient interobserver and intraobserver agreement on measuring gaps and stepoffs for supporting clinical decisions in acetabular fracture surgery. If observers cannot agree on the size of the gap and stepoff, it will be challenging to decide when to perform surgery and study the results of acetabular fracture surgery. Level of Evidence Level III, diagnostic study." @default.
• W3048386487 created "2020-08-18" @default.
• W3048386487 creator A5004367806 @default.
• W3048386487 creator A5011845102 @default.
• W3048386487 creator A5044607917 @default.
• W3048386487 creator A5047859527 @default.
• W3048386487 creator A5067200867 @default.
• W3048386487 creator A5080386910 @default.
• W3048386487 creator A5086882002 @default.
• W3048386487 creator A5087889275 @default.
• W3048386487 creator A5091670687 @default.
• W3048386487 date "2020-07-16" @default.
• W3048386487 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W3048386487 title "What Are the Interobserver and Intraobserver Variability of Gap and Stepoff Measurements in Acetabular Fractures?" @default.
• W3048386487 cites W116848480 @default.
• W3048386487 cites W1574521113 @default.
• W3048386487 cites W1966976587 @default.
• W3048386487 cites W1979882100 @default.
• W3048386487 cites W2034476325 @default.
• W3048386487 cites W2063085086 @default.
• W3048386487 cites W2072782971 @default.
• W3048386487 cites W2086183790 @default.
• W3048386487 cites W2088333721 @default.
• W3048386487 cites W2088427785 @default.
• W3048386487 cites W2170159143 @default.
• W3048386487 cites W2187047202 @default.
• W3048386487 cites W2222917871 @default.
• W3048386487 cites W2329341092 @default.
• W3048386487 cites W2405283499 @default.
• W3048386487 cites W2407118493 @default.
• W3048386487 cites W2566063795 @default.
• W3048386487 cites W2767188296 @default.
• W3048386487 cites W2777366205 @default.
• W3048386487 cites W2789510531 @default.
• W3048386487 cites W2790700554 @default.
• W3048386487 cites W2801945247 @default.
• W3048386487 cites W2805348167 @default.
• W3048386487 cites W2952341508 @default.
• W3048386487 cites W2974579972 @default.
• W3048386487 cites W2991017180 @default.
• W3048386487 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/corr.0000000000001398" @default.
• W3048386487 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/7899427" @default.
• W3048386487 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32769535" @default.
• W3048386487 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3048386487 type Work @default.
• W3048386487 sameAs 3048386487 @default.
• W3048386487 citedByCount "7" @default.
• W3048386487 countsByYear W30483864872020 @default.
• W3048386487 countsByYear W30483864872021 @default.
• W3048386487 countsByYear W30483864872022 @default.
• W3048386487 countsByYear W30483864872023 @default.
• W3048386487 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3048386487 hasAuthorship W3048386487A5004367806 @default.
• W3048386487 hasAuthorship W3048386487A5011845102 @default.
• W3048386487 hasAuthorship W3048386487A5044607917 @default.
• W3048386487 hasAuthorship W3048386487A5047859527 @default.
• W3048386487 hasAuthorship W3048386487A5067200867 @default.
• W3048386487 hasAuthorship W3048386487A5080386910 @default.
• W3048386487 hasAuthorship W3048386487A5086882002 @default.
• W3048386487 hasAuthorship W3048386487A5087889275 @default.
• W3048386487 hasAuthorship W3048386487A5091670687 @default.
• W3048386487 hasBestOaLocation W30483864871 @default.
• W3048386487 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W3048386487 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3048386487 hasConcept C2776805002 @default.
• W3048386487 hasConcept C2780107948 @default.
• W3048386487 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W3048386487 hasConcept C36454342 @default.
• W3048386487 hasConcept C68312169 @default.
• W3048386487 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3048386487 hasConcept C72202192 @default.
• W3048386487 hasConceptScore W3048386487C126838900 @default.
• W3048386487 hasConceptScore W3048386487C141071460 @default.
• W3048386487 hasConceptScore W3048386487C2776805002 @default.
• W3048386487 hasConceptScore W3048386487C2780107948 @default.
• W3048386487 hasConceptScore W3048386487C2989005 @default.
• W3048386487 hasConceptScore W3048386487C36454342 @default.
• W3048386487 hasConceptScore W3048386487C68312169 @default.
• W3048386487 hasConceptScore W3048386487C71924100 @default.
• W3048386487 hasConceptScore W3048386487C72202192 @default.
• W3048386487 hasIssue "12" @default.
• W3048386487 hasLocation W30483864871 @default.
• W3048386487 hasLocation W30483864872 @default.
• W3048386487 hasLocation W30483864873 @default.
• W3048386487 hasLocation W30483864874 @default.
• W3048386487 hasLocation W30483864875 @default.
• W3048386487 hasLocation W30483864876 @default.
• W3048386487 hasOpenAccess W3048386487 @default.
• W3048386487 hasPrimaryLocation W30483864871 @default.
• W3048386487 hasRelatedWork W1999131854 @default.
• W3048386487 hasRelatedWork W2047967234 @default.
• W3048386487 hasRelatedWork W2108519856 @default.
• W3048386487 hasRelatedWork W2156133006 @default.
• W3048386487 hasRelatedWork W2385506226 @default.
• W3048386487 hasRelatedWork W2431044021 @default.
• W3048386487 hasRelatedWork W2439875401 @default.
• W3048386487 hasRelatedWork W2789806011 @default.
• W3048386487 hasRelatedWork W3199575718 @default.

• next