FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3048467466> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3048467466 abstract "Abstract Background Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) compared the effects of laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but the results have remained inconsistent. Hence, a meta-analysis and a systematic review of these treatment modalities are necessary to evaluate their efficacy and safety for HCC treatment. Methods From the inception of this meta-analysis and review until August 31, 2019, we searched Medline, PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, and China Biomedical Literature Database for RCTs involving LH and RFA treatments of patients with HCC. The studies were screened and the data from these articles were extracted independently by two authors. Summary odd ratios (OR) or mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for each outcome with a fixed- or random-effect model. The outcomes for effectiveness evaluations included duration of surgery, estimated bleeding volume, incidence of blood transfusion during surgery, duration of hospital stay, and the outcome for safety included the incidence of cancer recurrence. Results Seven RCTs with a total of 615 patients were identified, 312 and 303 of which underwent RFA and LH treatments, respectively. The duration of surgery (MD = −99.04; 95% CI: −131.26–−66.82), estimated bleeding volume (MD = −241.97; 95% CI: −386.93–−97.02), incidence of blood transfusion during surgery (OR = 0.08; 95% CI: 0.02–0.37), and duration of hospital stay (MD = −3.4; 95% CI: −5.22–−1.57) in RFA treatment were significantly lower than those of LH treatment. However, the incidence of cancer recurrence was significantly higher for RFA treatment compared with LH treatment (OR = 2.68; 95% CI: 1.72–4.18). Conclusions LH treatment is preferred over RFA treatment with a better radical effect, but RFA treatment is more beneficial with smaller trauma, development of less complications, and shorter operating time when compared with HCC treatment." @default.
• W3048467466 created "2020-08-18" @default.
• W3048467466 creator A5006365973 @default.
• W3048467466 creator A5025252038 @default.
• W3048467466 creator A5056848609 @default.
• W3048467466 creator A5074865511 @default.
• W3048467466 creator A5088919087 @default.
• W3048467466 date "2020-08-12" @default.
• W3048467466 modified "2023-10-12" @default.
• W3048467466 title "Radiofrequency ablation versus laparoscopic hepatectomy for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis" @default.
• W3048467466 cites W1884370505 @default.
• W3048467466 cites W2050610191 @default.
• W3048467466 cites W2061735730 @default.
• W3048467466 cites W2069325236 @default.
• W3048467466 cites W2077738238 @default.
• W3048467466 cites W2087214057 @default.
• W3048467466 cites W2098923148 @default.
• W3048467466 cites W2124687949 @default.
• W3048467466 cites W2134833483 @default.
• W3048467466 cites W2152378750 @default.
• W3048467466 cites W2188737426 @default.
• W3048467466 cites W2196539325 @default.
• W3048467466 cites W2228352469 @default.
• W3048467466 cites W2244453014 @default.
• W3048467466 cites W2337173717 @default.
• W3048467466 cites W2501864251 @default.
• W3048467466 cites W2561456541 @default.
• W3048467466 cites W2572861064 @default.
• W3048467466 cites W2590716867 @default.
• W3048467466 cites W2608443800 @default.
• W3048467466 cites W2609339697 @default.
• W3048467466 cites W2724155503 @default.
• W3048467466 cites W2765872229 @default.
• W3048467466 cites W2784034502 @default.
• W3048467466 cites W2784817779 @default.
• W3048467466 cites W2787154524 @default.
• W3048467466 cites W2791209060 @default.
• W3048467466 cites W2903316813 @default.
• W3048467466 cites W2935882657 @default.
• W3048467466 cites W2950072506 @default.
• W3048467466 cites W2957779270 @default.
• W3048467466 cites W2968501594 @default.
• W3048467466 cites W2968999681 @default.
• W3048467466 cites W2970269645 @default.
• W3048467466 cites W2972723791 @default.
• W3048467466 cites W2980192146 @default.
• W3048467466 cites W2981948898 @default.
• W3048467466 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-01966-w" @default.
• W3048467466 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/7425008" @default.
• W3048467466 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32787883" @default.
• W3048467466 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3048467466 type Work @default.
• W3048467466 sameAs 3048467466 @default.
• W3048467466 citedByCount "8" @default.
• W3048467466 countsByYear W30484674662021 @default.
• W3048467466 countsByYear W30484674662022 @default.
• W3048467466 countsByYear W30484674662023 @default.
• W3048467466 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3048467466 hasAuthorship W3048467466A5006365973 @default.
• W3048467466 hasAuthorship W3048467466A5025252038 @default.
• W3048467466 hasAuthorship W3048467466A5056848609 @default.
• W3048467466 hasAuthorship W3048467466A5074865511 @default.
• W3048467466 hasAuthorship W3048467466A5088919087 @default.
• W3048467466 hasBestOaLocation W30484674661 @default.
• W3048467466 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W3048467466 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W3048467466 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3048467466 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3048467466 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W3048467466 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3048467466 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3048467466 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
• W3048467466 hasConcept C2777377203 @default.
• W3048467466 hasConcept C2778019345 @default.
• W3048467466 hasConcept C2778902805 @default.
• W3048467466 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W3048467466 hasConcept C2780014101 @default.
• W3048467466 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W3048467466 hasConcept C61511704 @default.
• W3048467466 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3048467466 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W3048467466 hasConceptScore W3048467466C120665830 @default.
• W3048467466 hasConceptScore W3048467466C121332964 @default.
• W3048467466 hasConceptScore W3048467466C126322002 @default.
• W3048467466 hasConceptScore W3048467466C141071460 @default.
• W3048467466 hasConceptScore W3048467466C168563851 @default.
• W3048467466 hasConceptScore W3048467466C17744445 @default.
• W3048467466 hasConceptScore W3048467466C199539241 @default.
• W3048467466 hasConceptScore W3048467466C2776478404 @default.
• W3048467466 hasConceptScore W3048467466C2777377203 @default.
• W3048467466 hasConceptScore W3048467466C2778019345 @default.
• W3048467466 hasConceptScore W3048467466C2778902805 @default.
• W3048467466 hasConceptScore W3048467466C2779473830 @default.
• W3048467466 hasConceptScore W3048467466C2780014101 @default.
• W3048467466 hasConceptScore W3048467466C44249647 @default.
• W3048467466 hasConceptScore W3048467466C61511704 @default.
• W3048467466 hasConceptScore W3048467466C71924100 @default.
• W3048467466 hasConceptScore W3048467466C95190672 @default.
• W3048467466 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W3048467466 hasLocation W30484674661 @default.

• next