Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3048473420> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 99 of
99
with 100 items per page.
- W3048473420 endingPage "633" @default.
- W3048473420 startingPage "626" @default.
- W3048473420 abstract "Abstract Objective This study aimed to assess and compare XP-Endo Finisher (XP) cleaning efficiency with respect to the amount of remaining debris and smear layer versus Max-I-Probe needle (CI), EndoActivator device (EA), and combination of XP-Endo Finisher file with EndoActivator device (XP+EA) in oval root canals. Materials and Methods This in vitro study was performed on 36 extracted single root/canal mandibular premolars. Radiographic images were taken in buccolingual and mesiodistal projections to evaluate the shape of the root canal and determine whether it met exclusion criteria. All teeth were decoronated and prepared using Reciproc (R40). The samples were divided randomly into four groups: CI, EA, XP, and XP + EA. The root canals were irrigated with 5 mL of 17% EDTA and 2.5% NaOCl, respectively. Apart from the CI group, both solutions were activated by using the tested techniques for 1 minute. The teeth were split longitudinally, and the best visible identified sections of the roots were used as the representing samples for scanning electron microscope (SEM) evaluation. Each half was divided into the following three parts: 1 mm from the anatomic apex and a standardized photomicrograph with 500x and 1500x magnifications for debris and smear layer were obtained. A five-grade scoring system was utilized to quantify the results at the coronal, middle, and apical regions. Statistical analysis was performed by using the Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U tests. Results Group differences in debris and smear layer scores were found statistically significant for all locations as well as for overall assessment, except for the coronal third. Intragroup comparison of debris and smear layer in CI, EA, and XP had the minimum score at the middle third, with no significant difference compared with the coronal and apical thirds. XP + EA had less debris and smear layer score at the coronal third, significantly different from apical third. CI and EA had less debris and smear layer compared with XP and XP + EA at all locations with a significant difference at the middle and apical third (p < 0.05). Conclusion EA and CI showed less debris and smear layer than XP and XP + EA in the middle and apical third. The use of the XP in conjunction with the present irrigation protocol failed to have debris-free dentin surface in the apical portion of most of the root canals." @default.
- W3048473420 created "2020-08-18" @default.
- W3048473420 creator A5008126763 @default.
- W3048473420 creator A5061129813 @default.
- W3048473420 creator A5071984949 @default.
- W3048473420 date "2020-08-10" @default.
- W3048473420 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
- W3048473420 title "Debris and Smear Layer Removal from Oval Root Canals Comparing XP-Endo Finisher, EndoActivator, and Manual Irrigation: A SEM Evaluation" @default.
- W3048473420 cites W1964152756 @default.
- W3048473420 cites W1970556094 @default.
- W3048473420 cites W1971877223 @default.
- W3048473420 cites W1984610092 @default.
- W3048473420 cites W1985485236 @default.
- W3048473420 cites W1988562327 @default.
- W3048473420 cites W1990297904 @default.
- W3048473420 cites W1997099595 @default.
- W3048473420 cites W2007716381 @default.
- W3048473420 cites W2013930755 @default.
- W3048473420 cites W2029828217 @default.
- W3048473420 cites W2031030060 @default.
- W3048473420 cites W2047358554 @default.
- W3048473420 cites W2051191028 @default.
- W3048473420 cites W2056818301 @default.
- W3048473420 cites W2064611552 @default.
- W3048473420 cites W2064971083 @default.
- W3048473420 cites W2065153317 @default.
- W3048473420 cites W2082534440 @default.
- W3048473420 cites W2089303848 @default.
- W3048473420 cites W2095555472 @default.
- W3048473420 cites W2095597511 @default.
- W3048473420 cites W2110204112 @default.
- W3048473420 cites W2117198595 @default.
- W3048473420 cites W2119973545 @default.
- W3048473420 cites W2120737741 @default.
- W3048473420 cites W2146716047 @default.
- W3048473420 cites W2153118564 @default.
- W3048473420 cites W2236977584 @default.
- W3048473420 cites W2297479875 @default.
- W3048473420 cites W2396226824 @default.
- W3048473420 cites W2560455512 @default.
- W3048473420 cites W2610431025 @default.
- W3048473420 cites W2900299152 @default.
- W3048473420 cites W2937555262 @default.
- W3048473420 cites W4231938834 @default.
- W3048473420 doi "https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1714762" @default.
- W3048473420 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/7535965" @default.
- W3048473420 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32777834" @default.
- W3048473420 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
- W3048473420 type Work @default.
- W3048473420 sameAs 3048473420 @default.
- W3048473420 citedByCount "18" @default.
- W3048473420 countsByYear W30484734202020 @default.
- W3048473420 countsByYear W30484734202021 @default.
- W3048473420 countsByYear W30484734202022 @default.
- W3048473420 countsByYear W30484734202023 @default.
- W3048473420 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3048473420 hasAuthorship W3048473420A5008126763 @default.
- W3048473420 hasAuthorship W3048473420A5061129813 @default.
- W3048473420 hasAuthorship W3048473420A5071984949 @default.
- W3048473420 hasBestOaLocation W30484734201 @default.
- W3048473420 hasConcept C105702510 @default.
- W3048473420 hasConcept C13483470 @default.
- W3048473420 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
- W3048473420 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
- W3048473420 hasConcept C2778492126 @default.
- W3048473420 hasConcept C2779747767 @default.
- W3048473420 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
- W3048473420 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W3048473420 hasConceptScore W3048473420C105702510 @default.
- W3048473420 hasConceptScore W3048473420C13483470 @default.
- W3048473420 hasConceptScore W3048473420C192562407 @default.
- W3048473420 hasConceptScore W3048473420C199343813 @default.
- W3048473420 hasConceptScore W3048473420C2778492126 @default.
- W3048473420 hasConceptScore W3048473420C2779747767 @default.
- W3048473420 hasConceptScore W3048473420C29694066 @default.
- W3048473420 hasConceptScore W3048473420C71924100 @default.
- W3048473420 hasIssue "04" @default.
- W3048473420 hasLocation W30484734201 @default.
- W3048473420 hasLocation W30484734202 @default.
- W3048473420 hasLocation W30484734203 @default.
- W3048473420 hasOpenAccess W3048473420 @default.
- W3048473420 hasPrimaryLocation W30484734201 @default.
- W3048473420 hasRelatedWork W177081744 @default.
- W3048473420 hasRelatedWork W1966018114 @default.
- W3048473420 hasRelatedWork W1992616144 @default.
- W3048473420 hasRelatedWork W2015730503 @default.
- W3048473420 hasRelatedWork W2063476666 @default.
- W3048473420 hasRelatedWork W2440787519 @default.
- W3048473420 hasRelatedWork W3092871129 @default.
- W3048473420 hasRelatedWork W3093231408 @default.
- W3048473420 hasRelatedWork W4247002582 @default.
- W3048473420 hasRelatedWork W4317434240 @default.
- W3048473420 hasVolume "14" @default.
- W3048473420 isParatext "false" @default.
- W3048473420 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W3048473420 magId "3048473420" @default.
- W3048473420 workType "article" @default.