FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3048502624> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3048502624 abstract "Acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMICS) occurs in up to 10% of acute myocardial infarction admissions and is associated with high mortality, frequent adverse outcomes, prolonged hospitalizations, extensive medical resource utilization, and major cost. Using hospital cost data for Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS) patients with AMICS, we sought to evaluate in hospital and 45-day outcomes and cost, comparing patients treated with percutaneous ventricular assist device (pVAD) versus extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). The goal of this study was to better understand clinical and economic outcomes of AMICS to help clinicians and hospitals optimize outcomes most economically for AMICS patients.A retrospective claims analysis identified patients from the full census Medicare Standard Analytic Files compiled by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) including: Inpatient, Outpatient, Skilled Nursing Facility and Home Health files for Medicare FFS beneficiaries. Study costs were defined as the total costs incurred by providers for treating a population with AMICS. Medicare FFS beneficiaries who experienced an inpatient admission during the index period (January 1, 2015 to March 31, 2017) with a diagnosis of AMICS were eligible for study inclusion and were identified by the presence of appropriate International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Versions (ICD-9 and ICD-10) diagnosis and procedure codes. To create a matched sample and control for any baseline differences, a 1:1 Propensity Score Matching (PSM) was performed based on criteria such as age, gender, race, geographic distribution, and 11 high-cost comorbidities (e.g., congestive HF, coronary artery disease, diabetes, etc.). Index length of stay (LOS), index costs, discharge disposition (including mortality), post-index utilization, and episode-of-care (EOC) costs were reviewed. EOC was defined as index admission for all patients plus a 45-day post index period for patients who survived the index admission.Each cohort included 338 patients. Index in-hospital mortality rates were 53% for pVAD versus 64% for ECMO (178 vs. 217; p = .0023), and total EOC in-hospital mortality rates were 66% for pVAD versus 74% for ECMO (222 vs. 250; p = .0160). Index LOS for pVAD was 27% lower versus ECMO (12.12 vs. 16.59; p = .0006). The index LOS for patients discharged alive was 25% lower for pVAD versus ECMO (17.73 vs. 23.62; p = .0016). For patients that experienced in-hospital mortality during their index stay, pVAD had a 44% lower LOS compared to ECMO (7.08 vs. 12.66; p < .0001). Following index hospitalization, the average cost savings with additional inpatient care was 31% lower for pVAD patients ($62,188 vs. $90,087; p = NS). During the EOC, pVAD patients incurred 32% lower costs compared to ECMO patients ($117,849 vs. $172,420; <.0001).This study of Medicare FFS patients demonstrates that hospitals utilizing pVAD for appropriately selected AMICS patients have reduced mortality rates and reduced index LOS with lower index facility costs and lower post index 45-day costs. The study results offer hospitals and clinicians an opportunity to improve clinical outcomes and reduce total EOC costs in treating patients with AMI complicated by CS." @default.
• W3048502624 created "2020-08-18" @default.
• W3048502624 creator A5013272427 @default.
• W3048502624 creator A5055761918 @default.
• W3048502624 creator A5071161224 @default.
• W3048502624 date "2020-08-13" @default.
• W3048502624 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W3048502624 title "Cost savings for <scp>pVAD</scp> compared to <scp>ECMO</scp> in the management of acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: An <scp>episode‐of‐care</scp> analysis" @default.
• W3048502624 cites W1565432734 @default.
• W3048502624 cites W1982533297 @default.
• W3048502624 cites W1998504880 @default.
• W3048502624 cites W2001420755 @default.
• W3048502624 cites W2013612016 @default.
• W3048502624 cites W2034185700 @default.
• W3048502624 cites W2038381502 @default.
• W3048502624 cites W2051963003 @default.
• W3048502624 cites W2052687249 @default.
• W3048502624 cites W2106703370 @default.
• W3048502624 cites W2170179774 @default.
• W3048502624 cites W2256699976 @default.
• W3048502624 cites W2314870069 @default.
• W3048502624 cites W2413335991 @default.
• W3048502624 cites W2759045576 @default.
• W3048502624 cites W2765645943 @default.
• W3048502624 cites W2766560262 @default.
• W3048502624 cites W2775845425 @default.
• W3048502624 cites W2791730097 @default.
• W3048502624 cites W2890068834 @default.
• W3048502624 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.29181" @default.
• W3048502624 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32790231" @default.
• W3048502624 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3048502624 type Work @default.
• W3048502624 sameAs 3048502624 @default.
• W3048502624 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W3048502624 countsByYear W30485026242020 @default.
• W3048502624 countsByYear W30485026242022 @default.
• W3048502624 countsByYear W30485026242023 @default.
• W3048502624 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3048502624 hasAuthorship W3048502624A5013272427 @default.
• W3048502624 hasAuthorship W3048502624A5055761918 @default.
• W3048502624 hasAuthorship W3048502624A5071161224 @default.
• W3048502624 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3048502624 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W3048502624 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W3048502624 hasConcept C194828623 @default.
• W3048502624 hasConcept C2776534028 @default.
• W3048502624 hasConcept C2776850375 @default.
• W3048502624 hasConcept C2776858399 @default.
• W3048502624 hasConcept C2778213512 @default.
• W3048502624 hasConcept C2780400711 @default.
• W3048502624 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W3048502624 hasConcept C45827449 @default.
• W3048502624 hasConcept C500558357 @default.
• W3048502624 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W3048502624 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3048502624 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W3048502624 hasConceptScore W3048502624C126322002 @default.
• W3048502624 hasConceptScore W3048502624C160735492 @default.
• W3048502624 hasConceptScore W3048502624C162324750 @default.
• W3048502624 hasConceptScore W3048502624C194828623 @default.
• W3048502624 hasConceptScore W3048502624C2776534028 @default.
• W3048502624 hasConceptScore W3048502624C2776850375 @default.
• W3048502624 hasConceptScore W3048502624C2776858399 @default.
• W3048502624 hasConceptScore W3048502624C2778213512 @default.
• W3048502624 hasConceptScore W3048502624C2780400711 @default.
• W3048502624 hasConceptScore W3048502624C2908647359 @default.
• W3048502624 hasConceptScore W3048502624C45827449 @default.
• W3048502624 hasConceptScore W3048502624C500558357 @default.
• W3048502624 hasConceptScore W3048502624C50522688 @default.
• W3048502624 hasConceptScore W3048502624C71924100 @default.
• W3048502624 hasConceptScore W3048502624C99454951 @default.
• W3048502624 hasLocation W30485026241 @default.
• W3048502624 hasLocation W30485026242 @default.
• W3048502624 hasOpenAccess W3048502624 @default.
• W3048502624 hasPrimaryLocation W30485026241 @default.
• W3048502624 hasRelatedWork W1842693503 @default.
• W3048502624 hasRelatedWork W2419123790 @default.
• W3048502624 hasRelatedWork W2440487069 @default.
• W3048502624 hasRelatedWork W2524616288 @default.
• W3048502624 hasRelatedWork W2565132324 @default.
• W3048502624 hasRelatedWork W2918435398 @default.
• W3048502624 hasRelatedWork W2920668817 @default.
• W3048502624 hasRelatedWork W2990205176 @default.
• W3048502624 hasRelatedWork W3029425825 @default.
• W3048502624 hasRelatedWork W4306250982 @default.
• W3048502624 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3048502624 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3048502624 magId "3048502624" @default.
• W3048502624 workType "article" @default.