FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3048594568> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3048594568 endingPage "e19958" @default.
• W3048594568 startingPage "e19958" @default.
• W3048594568 abstract "Background Dental caries is the most common multifactorial oral disease; it affects 60% to 90% of the global population. Dental caries is highly preventable through prevention behaviors aimed at improving oral hygiene, adequate fluoride usage, and dietary intake. Mobile apps have the potential to support patients with dental caries; however, little is known about the availability, target audience, quality, and features of these apps. Objective This review aims to systematically examine dental caries prevention apps; to describe their content, availability, target audience, and features; and to assess their quality. Methods We systematically identified and evaluated apps in a process paralleling a systematic review. This included a search strategy using search terms; an eligibility assessment using inclusion and exclusion criteria focused on accessibility and dental caries self-management behaviors, including oral hygiene, dietary intake, and fluoride usage; data extraction on app characteristics, including app store metrics; prevention behavior categorization; feature identification and description; a quality appraisal of all apps using the validated Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS) assessment tool; and data comparison and analysis. Results Using our search strategy, we retrieved 562 apps from the Google Play Store and iTunes available in Australia. Of these, 7.1% (40/562) of the apps fit our eligibility criteria, of which 55% (22/40) targeted adults, 93% (37/40) were free to download, and 65% (26/40) were recently updated. Oral hygiene was the most common dental caries prevention behavior domain, addressed in 93% (37/40) of the apps, while dietary intake was addressed in 45% (18/40) of the apps and fluoride usage was addressed in 42% (17/40) of the apps. Overall, 50% (20/40) of the apps addressed only 1 behavior, and 38% (15/40) of the apps addressed all 3 behaviors. The mean MARS score was 2.9 (SD 0.7; range 1.8-4.4), with 45% (18/40) of the apps categorized as high quality, with a rating above 3.0 out of 5.0. We identified 21 distinctive features across all dental caries prevention behaviors; however, the top 5 most common features focused on oral hygiene. The highest-ranking app was the Brush DJ app, with an overall MARS score of 4.4 and with the highest number of features (n=13). We did not find any apps that adequately addressed dental caries prevention behaviors in very young children. Conclusions Apps addressing dental caries prevention commonly focus on oral hygiene and target young adults; however, many are not of high quality. These apps use a range of features to support consumer engagement, and some of these features may be helpful for specific patient populations. However, it remains unclear how effective these apps are in improving dental caries outcomes, and further evaluation is required before they are widely recommended." @default.
• W3048594568 created "2020-08-18" @default.
• W3048594568 creator A5003726703 @default.
• W3048594568 creator A5009321229 @default.
• W3048594568 creator A5012111658 @default.
• W3048594568 creator A5018285612 @default.
• W3048594568 creator A5065025103 @default.
• W3048594568 creator A5074418281 @default.
• W3048594568 creator A5091313685 @default.
• W3048594568 date "2021-01-13" @default.
• W3048594568 modified "2023-10-13" @default.
• W3048594568 title "Mobile Apps for Dental Caries Prevention: Systematic Search and Quality Evaluation" @default.
• W3048594568 cites W1715409495 @default.
• W3048594568 cites W1748592323 @default.
• W3048594568 cites W2028891040 @default.
• W3048594568 cites W2107971163 @default.
• W3048594568 cites W2109031474 @default.
• W3048594568 cites W2119778385 @default.
• W3048594568 cites W2144403769 @default.
• W3048594568 cites W2161045010 @default.
• W3048594568 cites W2207674086 @default.
• W3048594568 cites W2298228937 @default.
• W3048594568 cites W2415928823 @default.
• W3048594568 cites W2498802726 @default.
• W3048594568 cites W2551537348 @default.
• W3048594568 cites W2559712102 @default.
• W3048594568 cites W2562874248 @default.
• W3048594568 cites W2736698563 @default.
• W3048594568 cites W2763955561 @default.
• W3048594568 cites W2765678633 @default.
• W3048594568 cites W2790260609 @default.
• W3048594568 cites W2802822747 @default.
• W3048594568 cites W2809129970 @default.
• W3048594568 cites W2883493213 @default.
• W3048594568 cites W2884271033 @default.
• W3048594568 cites W2888249068 @default.
• W3048594568 cites W2890904488 @default.
• W3048594568 cites W2892293607 @default.
• W3048594568 cites W2908770909 @default.
• W3048594568 cites W2909727916 @default.
• W3048594568 cites W2911856420 @default.
• W3048594568 cites W2911884741 @default.
• W3048594568 cites W2920560680 @default.
• W3048594568 cites W2924993635 @default.
• W3048594568 cites W2941496369 @default.
• W3048594568 cites W2942206735 @default.
• W3048594568 cites W2945422858 @default.
• W3048594568 cites W2949036829 @default.
• W3048594568 cites W2949508445 @default.
• W3048594568 cites W2956106763 @default.
• W3048594568 cites W2956655325 @default.
• W3048594568 cites W2966698152 @default.
• W3048594568 cites W2975516305 @default.
• W3048594568 cites W2975811141 @default.
• W3048594568 cites W2979053899 @default.
• W3048594568 cites W2980599324 @default.
• W3048594568 cites W2983041379 @default.
• W3048594568 cites W2995291628 @default.
• W3048594568 cites W3007765309 @default.
• W3048594568 cites W3010709142 @default.
• W3048594568 cites W3019462843 @default.
• W3048594568 cites W4211107393 @default.
• W3048594568 cites W4251218038 @default.
• W3048594568 doi "https://doi.org/10.2196/19958" @default.
• W3048594568 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/7840287" @default.
• W3048594568 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33439141" @default.
• W3048594568 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3048594568 type Work @default.
• W3048594568 sameAs 3048594568 @default.
• W3048594568 citedByCount "22" @default.
• W3048594568 countsByYear W30485945682021 @default.
• W3048594568 countsByYear W30485945682022 @default.
• W3048594568 countsByYear W30485945682023 @default.
• W3048594568 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3048594568 hasAuthorship W3048594568A5003726703 @default.
• W3048594568 hasAuthorship W3048594568A5009321229 @default.
• W3048594568 hasAuthorship W3048594568A5012111658 @default.
• W3048594568 hasAuthorship W3048594568A5018285612 @default.
• W3048594568 hasAuthorship W3048594568A5065025103 @default.
• W3048594568 hasAuthorship W3048594568A5074418281 @default.
• W3048594568 hasAuthorship W3048594568A5091313685 @default.
• W3048594568 hasBestOaLocation W30485945681 @default.
• W3048594568 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W3048594568 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W3048594568 hasConcept C2779794324 @default.
• W3048594568 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W3048594568 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W3048594568 hasConcept C515851188 @default.
• W3048594568 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3048594568 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W3048594568 hasConceptScore W3048594568C136764020 @default.
• W3048594568 hasConceptScore W3048594568C199343813 @default.
• W3048594568 hasConceptScore W3048594568C2779794324 @default.
• W3048594568 hasConceptScore W3048594568C2908647359 @default.
• W3048594568 hasConceptScore W3048594568C41008148 @default.
• W3048594568 hasConceptScore W3048594568C515851188 @default.
• W3048594568 hasConceptScore W3048594568C71924100 @default.
• W3048594568 hasConceptScore W3048594568C99454951 @default.

• next