FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3048651964> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3048651964 endingPage "213" @default.
• W3048651964 startingPage "198" @default.
• W3048651964 abstract "Objectives To investigate the general public’s source credibility attitudes towards health and social care professionals when giving advice associated with their ‘traditional role’ versus an ‘expanded health behaviour change’ role, to facilitate the implementation of the health behaviour change agenda. Design A 3x3 experimental between-subjects vignette questionnaire study with nine scenarios in which a general practitioner (GP), health visitor, or firefighter offered advice on either stopping smoking, preventing cot death, or fire safety. Combinations were either congruent with a traditional role (e.g., health visitor and cot death) or an expanded role (e.g., firefighter and stopping smoking). Methods Adults were recruited from metropolitan locations in northern England. Participants were randomized to one scenario and complete a validated 18-item source credibility questionnaire. Factor analysis explored source credibility components; ratings for traditional and expanded role scenarios were compared using Mann–Whitney tests. Results 369 participants completed the questionnaire (49.3% women, 64% White British, age range: 16–83). Factor analysis confirmed three source credibility dimensions: competence, caring, and trustworthiness. Ratings were generally high across professions and scenarios; participants rated professionals as significantly more ‘competent’ where scenarios related to their traditional roles than expanded roles (U 9778.5, p <.001) but equally as caring (U = 14467.5, p< .485) and trustworthy (U 14250.5, p .348). Conclusions GPs, health visitors, and firefighters were all perceived as credible sources of health behaviour change advice, but may be viewed as ‘less competent’ sources of messages associated with an expanded job role. Effective professional training and public engagement regarding the role expansion agenda are needed to support policy implementation. Statement of Contribution What is already known on this subject? Source credibility surrounds people’s perceptions of the source of advice and includes competence, caring, and trustworthiness dimensions. This may have an important influence on people’s attitudes and behaviour, especially when messages are complex or emotive. A wide range of public sector workers is now expected to routinely offer preventive health and safety advice, as part of role expansion. What does this study add? This experimental survey study compared source credibility perceptions of GPs, health visitors, and firefighters giving advice on topics associated with a traditional or expanded role. Professionals were perceived as less ‘competent’ when giving advice on ‘expanded role’ topics, such as a firefighter discussing smoking, with a small reduction in source credibility. This highlights that source credibility may be specific to professional identities. Policymakers may need to explore this further as part of implementing role expansion for prevention and self-management in health and social care." @default.
• W3048651964 created "2020-08-18" @default.
• W3048651964 creator A5007079653 @default.
• W3048651964 creator A5013002592 @default.
• W3048651964 creator A5019110927 @default.
• W3048651964 creator A5074840883 @default.
• W3048651964 date "2020-08-13" @default.
• W3048651964 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W3048651964 title "Who is a credible source of preventive advice? An experimental vignette study of general public attitudes towards role expansion in health and social care" @default.
• W3048651964 cites W1923752250 @default.
• W3048651964 cites W1992262987 @default.
• W3048651964 cites W2015184797 @default.
• W3048651964 cites W2045009615 @default.
• W3048651964 cites W2045057132 @default.
• W3048651964 cites W2053699201 @default.
• W3048651964 cites W2090892634 @default.
• W3048651964 cites W2099697766 @default.
• W3048651964 cites W2120061261 @default.
• W3048651964 cites W2123228747 @default.
• W3048651964 cites W2125329158 @default.
• W3048651964 cites W2128248134 @default.
• W3048651964 cites W2139249918 @default.
• W3048651964 cites W2142150409 @default.
• W3048651964 cites W2153960569 @default.
• W3048651964 cites W2157392583 @default.
• W3048651964 cites W2158063113 @default.
• W3048651964 cites W2216435714 @default.
• W3048651964 cites W2591767975 @default.
• W3048651964 cites W2613488435 @default.
• W3048651964 cites W2616823151 @default.
• W3048651964 cites W2768904287 @default.
• W3048651964 cites W2792723513 @default.
• W3048651964 cites W2805242877 @default.
• W3048651964 cites W2888483867 @default.
• W3048651964 cites W2991257963 @default.
• W3048651964 cites W4206273048 @default.
• W3048651964 cites W4238722264 @default.
• W3048651964 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12464" @default.
• W3048651964 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32790002" @default.
• W3048651964 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3048651964 type Work @default.
• W3048651964 sameAs 3048651964 @default.
• W3048651964 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W3048651964 countsByYear W30486519642021 @default.
• W3048651964 countsByYear W30486519642022 @default.
• W3048651964 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3048651964 hasAuthorship W3048651964A5007079653 @default.
• W3048651964 hasAuthorship W3048651964A5013002592 @default.
• W3048651964 hasAuthorship W3048651964A5019110927 @default.
• W3048651964 hasAuthorship W3048651964A5074840883 @default.
• W3048651964 hasBestOaLocation W30486519641 @default.
• W3048651964 hasConcept C100521375 @default.
• W3048651964 hasConcept C138816342 @default.
• W3048651964 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W3048651964 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W3048651964 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W3048651964 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W3048651964 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3048651964 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W3048651964 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3048651964 hasConcept C2776367032 @default.
• W3048651964 hasConcept C2776620684 @default.
• W3048651964 hasConcept C2780224610 @default.
• W3048651964 hasConcept C2993202890 @default.
• W3048651964 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W3048651964 hasConcept C48947383 @default.
• W3048651964 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W3048651964 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3048651964 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W3048651964 hasConcept C9719361 @default.
• W3048651964 hasConceptScore W3048651964C100521375 @default.
• W3048651964 hasConceptScore W3048651964C138816342 @default.
• W3048651964 hasConceptScore W3048651964C15744967 @default.
• W3048651964 hasConceptScore W3048651964C159110408 @default.
• W3048651964 hasConceptScore W3048651964C160735492 @default.
• W3048651964 hasConceptScore W3048651964C162324750 @default.
• W3048651964 hasConceptScore W3048651964C17744445 @default.
• W3048651964 hasConceptScore W3048651964C199360897 @default.
• W3048651964 hasConceptScore W3048651964C199539241 @default.
• W3048651964 hasConceptScore W3048651964C2776367032 @default.
• W3048651964 hasConceptScore W3048651964C2776620684 @default.
• W3048651964 hasConceptScore W3048651964C2780224610 @default.
• W3048651964 hasConceptScore W3048651964C2993202890 @default.
• W3048651964 hasConceptScore W3048651964C41008148 @default.
• W3048651964 hasConceptScore W3048651964C48947383 @default.
• W3048651964 hasConceptScore W3048651964C50522688 @default.
• W3048651964 hasConceptScore W3048651964C71924100 @default.
• W3048651964 hasConceptScore W3048651964C77805123 @default.
• W3048651964 hasConceptScore W3048651964C9719361 @default.
• W3048651964 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W3048651964 hasLocation W30486519641 @default.
• W3048651964 hasLocation W30486519642 @default.
• W3048651964 hasLocation W30486519643 @default.
• W3048651964 hasOpenAccess W3048651964 @default.
• W3048651964 hasPrimaryLocation W30486519641 @default.
• W3048651964 hasRelatedWork W2001653024 @default.
• W3048651964 hasRelatedWork W2016703484 @default.
• W3048651964 hasRelatedWork W2020460996 @default.

• next