FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3048781684> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3048781684 endingPage "e19471" @default.
• W3048781684 startingPage "e19471" @default.
• W3048781684 abstract "Background Innovative laboratory testing approaches for SARS-CoV-2 infection and immune response are needed to conduct research to establish estimates of prevalence and incidence. Self-specimen collection methods have been successfully used in HIV and sexually transmitted infection research and can provide a feasible opportunity to scale up SARS-CoV-2 testing for research purposes. Objective The aim of this study was to assess the willingness of adults to use different specimen collection modalities for themselves and children as part of a COVID-19 research study. Methods Between March 27 and April 1, 2020, we recruited 1435 adults aged 18 years or older though social media advertisements. Participants completed a survey that included 5-point Likert scale items stating how willing they were to use the following specimen collection testing modalities as part of a research study: home collection of a saliva sample, home collection of a throat swab, home finger-prick blood collection, drive-through site throat swab, clinic throat swab, and clinic blood collection. Additionally, participants indicated how the availability of home-based collection methods would impact their willingness to participate compared to drive-through and clinic-based specimen collection. We used Kruskal-Wallis tests and Spearman rank correlations to assess if willingness to use each testing modality differed by demographic variables and characteristics of interest. We compared the overall willingness to use each testing modality and estimated effect sizes with Cohen d. Results We analyzed responses from 1435 participants with a median age of 40.0 (SD=18.2) years and over half of which were female (761/1435, 53.0%). Most participants agreed or strongly agreed that they would be willing to use specimens self-collected at home to participate in research, including willingness to collect a saliva sample (1259/1435, 87.7%) or a throat swab (1191/1435, 83.1%). Willingness to collect a throat swab sample was lower in both a drive-through setting (64%) and clinic setting (53%). Overall, 69.0% (990/1435) of participants said they would be more likely to participate in a research study if they could provide a saliva sample or throat swab at home compared to going to a drive-through site; only 4.4% (63/1435) of participants said they would be less likely to participate using self-collected samples. For each specimen collection modality, willingness to collect specimens from children for research was lower than willingness to use on oneself, but the ranked order of modalities was similar. Conclusions Most participants were willing to participate in a COVID-19 research study that involves laboratory testing; however, there was a strong preference for home specimen collection procedures over drive-through or clinic-based testing. To increase participation and minimize bias, epidemiologic research studies of SARS-CoV-2 infection and immune response should consider home specimen collection methods." @default.
• W3048781684 created "2020-08-18" @default.
• W3048781684 creator A5005820112 @default.
• W3048781684 creator A5010194924 @default.
• W3048781684 creator A5019703763 @default.
• W3048781684 creator A5020812187 @default.
• W3048781684 creator A5031310041 @default.
• W3048781684 creator A5034962266 @default.
• W3048781684 creator A5037900581 @default.
• W3048781684 creator A5064768621 @default.
• W3048781684 date "2020-09-03" @default.
• W3048781684 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W3048781684 title "Willingness to Use Home Collection Methods to Provide Specimens for SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 Research: Survey Study" @default.
• W3048781684 cites W2032388085 @default.
• W3048781684 cites W2040929270 @default.
• W3048781684 cites W2050315753 @default.
• W3048781684 cites W2050453477 @default.
• W3048781684 cites W2056980641 @default.
• W3048781684 cites W2073591605 @default.
• W3048781684 cites W2091254174 @default.
• W3048781684 cites W2165899877 @default.
• W3048781684 cites W2799484760 @default.
• W3048781684 cites W2887904499 @default.
• W3048781684 cites W2889312480 @default.
• W3048781684 cites W3003465021 @default.
• W3048781684 cites W3014250550 @default.
• W3048781684 cites W3014792282 @default.
• W3048781684 cites W4299627282 @default.
• W3048781684 cites W912202375 @default.
• W3048781684 doi "https://doi.org/10.2196/19471" @default.
• W3048781684 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/7473702" @default.
• W3048781684 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32790639" @default.
• W3048781684 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3048781684 type Work @default.
• W3048781684 sameAs 3048781684 @default.
• W3048781684 citedByCount "29" @default.
• W3048781684 countsByYear W30487816842020 @default.
• W3048781684 countsByYear W30487816842021 @default.
• W3048781684 countsByYear W30487816842022 @default.
• W3048781684 countsByYear W30487816842023 @default.
• W3048781684 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3048781684 hasAuthorship W3048781684A5005820112 @default.
• W3048781684 hasAuthorship W3048781684A5010194924 @default.
• W3048781684 hasAuthorship W3048781684A5019703763 @default.
• W3048781684 hasAuthorship W3048781684A5020812187 @default.
• W3048781684 hasAuthorship W3048781684A5031310041 @default.
• W3048781684 hasAuthorship W3048781684A5034962266 @default.
• W3048781684 hasAuthorship W3048781684A5037900581 @default.
• W3048781684 hasAuthorship W3048781684A5064768621 @default.
• W3048781684 hasBestOaLocation W30487816841 @default.
• W3048781684 hasConcept C105776082 @default.
• W3048781684 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W3048781684 hasConcept C133462117 @default.
• W3048781684 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
• W3048781684 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W3048781684 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W3048781684 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W3048781684 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3048781684 hasConceptScore W3048781684C105776082 @default.
• W3048781684 hasConceptScore W3048781684C105795698 @default.
• W3048781684 hasConceptScore W3048781684C133462117 @default.
• W3048781684 hasConceptScore W3048781684C138496976 @default.
• W3048781684 hasConceptScore W3048781684C15744967 @default.
• W3048781684 hasConceptScore W3048781684C33923547 @default.
• W3048781684 hasConceptScore W3048781684C512399662 @default.
• W3048781684 hasConceptScore W3048781684C71924100 @default.
• W3048781684 hasIssue "9" @default.
• W3048781684 hasLocation W30487816841 @default.
• W3048781684 hasLocation W30487816842 @default.
• W3048781684 hasOpenAccess W3048781684 @default.
• W3048781684 hasPrimaryLocation W30487816841 @default.
• W3048781684 hasRelatedWork W2003730563 @default.
• W3048781684 hasRelatedWork W2156326538 @default.
• W3048781684 hasRelatedWork W2340543077 @default.
• W3048781684 hasRelatedWork W2811420057 @default.
• W3048781684 hasRelatedWork W2989783296 @default.
• W3048781684 hasRelatedWork W3009669296 @default.
• W3048781684 hasRelatedWork W3128147204 @default.
• W3048781684 hasRelatedWork W3147895852 @default.
• W3048781684 hasRelatedWork W4313441285 @default.
• W3048781684 hasRelatedWork W2739777033 @default.
• W3048781684 hasVolume "22" @default.
• W3048781684 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3048781684 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3048781684 magId "3048781684" @default.
• W3048781684 workType "article" @default.