FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3048785946> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3048785946 endingPage "106807" @default.
• W3048785946 startingPage "106807" @default.
• W3048785946 abstract "Abstract Effective management measures for improving rapidly deteriorating estuaries around the world are hugely dependent on accurate evaluation of the ecological status, which is a challenge in itself considering the Estuarine Quality Paradox. Several Benthic Biotic Indices (BBIs) have been tested in estuaries in different bio-geographical zones with no concurrence whatsoever about the best approach in evaluating the ecological status. An often suggested approach is to apply several indices concurrently to gauge the overall status. However, this method typically results in more complexities due to the multiple contradicting conclusions derived by different indices besides increasing the computational load and the requirement of data matrices. Therefore, it would be reasonable to validate available BBIs in various estuaries of a biogeographical zone and select a common estuarine benthic index that can respond effectively to diverse stressors, considering the natural estuarine gradients. Towards this goal, five most frequently employed BBIs viz. AZTI’s Marine Biotic Index (AMBI), Multivariate AZTI’s Marine Biotic Index (M-AMBI), BENTIX, Benthic Opportunistic Polychaete Amphipoda index (BOPA) and Benthic Opportunistic Oligochaete Amphipoda index (BO2A) were applied in the three differently stressed estuaries (Ulhas, Amba and Savitri) of NW India during the three major seasons (premonsoon, monsoon and postmonsoon). It was aimed to test if any of the applied BBIs could appropriately determine the ecological status across salinity zones of all the estuaries and thus can act as a common estuarine index. While the indices generally concurred in high salinity zones of the heavily polluted Ulhas, discrepancies in ecological status were observed in other zones and estuaries, mostly erroneous when compared to the pre-determined status. As monsoonal index values appeared to have been influenced by the disturbance due to fresh water inflow during this season, the average of the two non-monsoonal seasons was considered for deriving the final status by all indices. Among the BBIs, AMBI exhibited stronger response to pressure gradients and was most successful in discriminating the correct ecological status of most of the salinity zones across the three estuaries. Thus, this index could reasonably be considered for ecological status evaluation of estuaries of NW India irrespective of the diverse anthropogenic stressors and macrobenthic composition. It is recommended that this conclusion be reaffirmed by repeating similar investigations in other monsoonal tropical estuaries of this zone." @default.
• W3048785946 created "2020-08-18" @default.
• W3048785946 creator A5010311508 @default.
• W3048785946 creator A5010318277 @default.
• W3048785946 creator A5046262552 @default.
• W3048785946 date "2020-12-01" @default.
• W3048785946 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W3048785946 title "Can the ecological status of three differentially impacted monsoonal tropical estuaries in NW India, be adequately assessed by a common estuarine benthic index?" @default.
• W3048785946 cites W1172425771 @default.
• W3048785946 cites W1572543759 @default.
• W3048785946 cites W1963777183 @default.
• W3048785946 cites W1970299485 @default.
• W3048785946 cites W1978404060 @default.
• W3048785946 cites W1984569163 @default.
• W3048785946 cites W1989607521 @default.
• W3048785946 cites W1990144679 @default.
• W3048785946 cites W1991364068 @default.
• W3048785946 cites W2012555332 @default.
• W3048785946 cites W2015471140 @default.
• W3048785946 cites W2016227002 @default.
• W3048785946 cites W2016395798 @default.
• W3048785946 cites W2018613262 @default.
• W3048785946 cites W2018714870 @default.
• W3048785946 cites W2020497896 @default.
• W3048785946 cites W2033412433 @default.
• W3048785946 cites W2037487787 @default.
• W3048785946 cites W2040935231 @default.
• W3048785946 cites W2045190652 @default.
• W3048785946 cites W2045836712 @default.
• W3048785946 cites W2049991799 @default.
• W3048785946 cites W2052125971 @default.
• W3048785946 cites W2069074534 @default.
• W3048785946 cites W2069987416 @default.
• W3048785946 cites W2072356752 @default.
• W3048785946 cites W2073545711 @default.
• W3048785946 cites W2074616016 @default.
• W3048785946 cites W2075733961 @default.
• W3048785946 cites W2079610864 @default.
• W3048785946 cites W2084273283 @default.
• W3048785946 cites W2086364925 @default.
• W3048785946 cites W2086724375 @default.
• W3048785946 cites W2086762169 @default.
• W3048785946 cites W2091160252 @default.
• W3048785946 cites W2102461036 @default.
• W3048785946 cites W2107234570 @default.
• W3048785946 cites W2108106320 @default.
• W3048785946 cites W2110876005 @default.
• W3048785946 cites W2111619501 @default.
• W3048785946 cites W2112180846 @default.
• W3048785946 cites W2126415453 @default.
• W3048785946 cites W2138983646 @default.
• W3048785946 cites W2147517430 @default.
• W3048785946 cites W2268894672 @default.
• W3048785946 cites W2288035705 @default.
• W3048785946 cites W2303503770 @default.
• W3048785946 cites W2345038644 @default.
• W3048785946 cites W2388277267 @default.
• W3048785946 cites W2611134411 @default.
• W3048785946 cites W2614056274 @default.
• W3048785946 cites W2765448499 @default.
• W3048785946 cites W2765667405 @default.
• W3048785946 cites W2766979091 @default.
• W3048785946 cites W2793688226 @default.
• W3048785946 cites W2805258237 @default.
• W3048785946 cites W2861979323 @default.
• W3048785946 cites W2928584795 @default.
• W3048785946 cites W2950651319 @default.
• W3048785946 cites W2993709643 @default.
• W3048785946 cites W2999544165 @default.
• W3048785946 cites W589785198 @default.
• W3048785946 cites W865951947 @default.
• W3048785946 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106807" @default.
• W3048785946 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3048785946 type Work @default.
• W3048785946 sameAs 3048785946 @default.
• W3048785946 citedByCount "16" @default.
• W3048785946 countsByYear W30487859462021 @default.
• W3048785946 countsByYear W30487859462022 @default.
• W3048785946 countsByYear W30487859462023 @default.
• W3048785946 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3048785946 hasAuthorship W3048785946A5010311508 @default.
• W3048785946 hasAuthorship W3048785946A5010318277 @default.
• W3048785946 hasAuthorship W3048785946A5046262552 @default.
• W3048785946 hasBestOaLocation W30487859461 @default.
• W3048785946 hasConcept C111368507 @default.
• W3048785946 hasConcept C127313418 @default.
• W3048785946 hasConcept C136996986 @default.
• W3048785946 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W3048785946 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W3048785946 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
• W3048785946 hasConcept C83042747 @default.
• W3048785946 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W3048785946 hasConcept C88160329 @default.
• W3048785946 hasConceptScore W3048785946C111368507 @default.
• W3048785946 hasConceptScore W3048785946C127313418 @default.
• W3048785946 hasConceptScore W3048785946C136996986 @default.
• W3048785946 hasConceptScore W3048785946C18903297 @default.
• W3048785946 hasConceptScore W3048785946C205649164 @default.

• next