FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3048791137> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3048791137 abstract "<p>Two leading theories propose different reasons for men’s and women’s intimate partner violence (IPV). The gendered theory proposes that society’s patriarchal norms of male dominance and female subordination cause men’s IPV towards women. From this perspective, violence against ‘wives’ is condoned by society, and women only perpetrate IPV in self-defence against men’s primary violence. Conversely, the chivalrous theory of IPV explains women’s IPV perpetration in terms of society’s chivalrous norms, which protect women from male violence and emboldens women to physically assault male partners. From this perspective, women’s violence is not considered harmful to men. As gendered theory and chivalrous theory both reference stereotyped gender attitudes (sexism) towards women, I used the ambivalent sexism inventory (ASI) to test the competing theories efficacy in explaining IPV perpetration by heterosexual men and women. The ASI conceptualises sexist attitudes towards women as comprised of two parts: hostile sexism (reflecting the hostility towards women outlined by gendered theory), and benevolent sexism (reflecting the benevolence towards women outlined by chivalrous theory). Gendered theory states that society condones violence towards women. Thus, men’s attitudes approving of male-perpetrated IPV should mediate the relationship between men’s hostile sexism and IPV, if gendered theory predictions are correct. Alternatively, chivalrous theory poses that society does not approve of violence towards women. Thus, attitudes disapproving of men’s IPV against women and approving of women’s IPV towards men should mediate the relationship between benevolent sexism and IPV if chivalrous theory is correct. I hypothesized men’s increased hostile sexism would predict men’s increased IPV perpetration through increased approval of IPV against women, and men’s increased benevolent sexism would predict men’s decreased IPV perpetration through decreased approval of IPV against women. Further, I hypothesised that women’s increased hostile sexism would predict women’s increased IPV perpetration through increased approval of IPV against men, and women’s benevolent sexism would predict increased IPV perpetration through increased approval of IPV against men. North American men and women (N = 688) filled out an online questionnaire measuring experiences of IPV as victims and/or perpetrators, approval of male and female IPV perpetration, and hostile and benevolent sexism. Multi-group structural equation modelling tested the extent to which positive attitudes toward intimate partner violence mediated the association between sexism and IPV perpetration for men and for women. Results found that, for both men and women, increased hostile sexism predicted greater IPV perpetration through greater approval of men’s IPV against women. Furthermore, increased benevolent sexism predicted women’s increased IPV perpetration through increased approval of men’s IPV against women. Men’s increased benevolent sexism did not predict men’s lower IPV perpetration or disapproval of IPV against women. However, men’s and women’s ambivalent sexism also predicted greater approval of women’s IPV towards men. Results did not fully support patriarchal or chivalrous predictions, instead aligning well with ambivalent sexism theory which posits a more inclusive and holistic understanding of the relationship between sexism and IPV perpetration. Reducing all forms of sexism and men’s and women’s positive attitudes toward the use of IPV are identified as important targets for IPV treatment and prevention.</p>" @default.
• W3048791137 created "2020-08-18" @default.
• W3048791137 creator A5074017909 @default.
• W3048791137 date "2021-12-08" @default.
• W3048791137 modified "2023-10-12" @default.
• W3048791137 title "Chivalry vs. Patriarchy: Exploring the Psychological Mechanisms of Physical Intimate Partner Violence (IPV)" @default.
• W3048791137 doi "https://doi.org/10.26686/wgtn.17147669.v1" @default.
• W3048791137 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3048791137 type Work @default.
• W3048791137 sameAs 3048791137 @default.
• W3048791137 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3048791137 crossrefType "dissertation" @default.
• W3048791137 hasAuthorship W3048791137A5074017909 @default.
• W3048791137 hasBestOaLocation W30487911371 @default.
• W3048791137 hasConcept C104317684 @default.
• W3048791137 hasConcept C107993555 @default.
• W3048791137 hasConcept C12713177 @default.
• W3048791137 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W3048791137 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W3048791137 hasConcept C151913843 @default.
• W3048791137 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W3048791137 hasConcept C157150851 @default.
• W3048791137 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W3048791137 hasConcept C162127614 @default.
• W3048791137 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W3048791137 hasConcept C2776234999 @default.
• W3048791137 hasConcept C2777406531 @default.
• W3048791137 hasConcept C2777688943 @default.
• W3048791137 hasConcept C2781214261 @default.
• W3048791137 hasConcept C3017944768 @default.
• W3048791137 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W3048791137 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W3048791137 hasConcept C526869908 @default.
• W3048791137 hasConcept C542059537 @default.
• W3048791137 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W3048791137 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3048791137 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W3048791137 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W3048791137 hasConceptScore W3048791137C104317684 @default.
• W3048791137 hasConceptScore W3048791137C107993555 @default.
• W3048791137 hasConceptScore W3048791137C12713177 @default.
• W3048791137 hasConceptScore W3048791137C138885662 @default.
• W3048791137 hasConceptScore W3048791137C144024400 @default.
• W3048791137 hasConceptScore W3048791137C151913843 @default.
• W3048791137 hasConceptScore W3048791137C154945302 @default.
• W3048791137 hasConceptScore W3048791137C157150851 @default.
• W3048791137 hasConceptScore W3048791137C15744967 @default.
• W3048791137 hasConceptScore W3048791137C162127614 @default.
• W3048791137 hasConceptScore W3048791137C185592680 @default.
• W3048791137 hasConceptScore W3048791137C2776234999 @default.
• W3048791137 hasConceptScore W3048791137C2777406531 @default.
• W3048791137 hasConceptScore W3048791137C2777688943 @default.
• W3048791137 hasConceptScore W3048791137C2781214261 @default.
• W3048791137 hasConceptScore W3048791137C3017944768 @default.
• W3048791137 hasConceptScore W3048791137C41008148 @default.
• W3048791137 hasConceptScore W3048791137C41895202 @default.
• W3048791137 hasConceptScore W3048791137C526869908 @default.
• W3048791137 hasConceptScore W3048791137C542059537 @default.
• W3048791137 hasConceptScore W3048791137C55493867 @default.
• W3048791137 hasConceptScore W3048791137C71924100 @default.
• W3048791137 hasConceptScore W3048791137C77805123 @default.
• W3048791137 hasConceptScore W3048791137C99454951 @default.
• W3048791137 hasLocation W30487911371 @default.
• W3048791137 hasLocation W30487911372 @default.
• W3048791137 hasOpenAccess W3048791137 @default.
• W3048791137 hasPrimaryLocation W30487911371 @default.
• W3048791137 hasRelatedWork W1544001836 @default.
• W3048791137 hasRelatedWork W1590936903 @default.
• W3048791137 hasRelatedWork W2321995891 @default.
• W3048791137 hasRelatedWork W2563382306 @default.
• W3048791137 hasRelatedWork W2914297435 @default.
• W3048791137 hasRelatedWork W2999644501 @default.
• W3048791137 hasRelatedWork W3005967503 @default.
• W3048791137 hasRelatedWork W3048791137 @default.
• W3048791137 hasRelatedWork W4312562925 @default.
• W3048791137 hasRelatedWork W3187854596 @default.
• W3048791137 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3048791137 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3048791137 magId "3048791137" @default.
• W3048791137 workType "dissertation" @default.