FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3048956034> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3048956034 endingPage "308" @default.
• W3048956034 startingPage "302" @default.
• W3048956034 abstract "Abstract Background The Antimicrobial Stewardship Clinical Care Standard states that patients should receive certain information about their antimicrobial therapy. How well the patient communication recommendations of the standard are followed in clinical practice is not well established. The aim of this pilot quality improvement study was to assess current practices around communication with hospitalised patients about their antimicrobial therapy, to determine compliance with current recommendations, and develop and implement quality improvement actions focused on patient communication for antimicrobial stewardship in Australia. Methods Adult inpatients receiving one or more antimicrobials for greater than 72 h were recruited. A survey was conducted to assess rates of compliance with requirements to inform patients about the indication, duration and potential side effects of current antimicrobial therapy; modes of delivery of information; and rates of patient satisfaction with the information provided. A paper-based survey was conducted on the general medical, infectious diseases, geriatric evaluation and management, and rehabilitation wards in a 500-bed tertiary Australian hospital. A sample size of 50 was determined as adequate for a baseline analysis of patient communication practices and the development of quality improvement resources and actions. Responses to categorical questions were analysed quantitatively, with additional feedback from patients was collated and analysed qualitatively. Results A total of 54 patients were surveyed. A majority (83%) of patients had been informed that they were taking antimicrobials, and, of these, 96% said they knew the indication, 18% were informed of potential side effects, and 36% knew the duration. Only 22% were informed of the review plan and 27% knew if antimicrobials would be continued on discharge. Written information was given to 11% of patients. Over half (62%) of patients either wanted more information or had concerns about their antimicrobial therapy. Patients reported difficulty in obtaining information. Fifty-eight percent of patients received antimicrobial information from doctors, 13% from nurses and 12% from pharmacists. Conclusions This study identified gaps in communication with patients regarding in-hospital antimicrobial therapy, and highlighted the need for development and delivery of local quality improvement activities to address this gap." @default.
• W3048956034 created "2020-08-18" @default.
• W3048956034 creator A5026216873 @default.
• W3048956034 creator A5058937834 @default.
• W3048956034 creator A5060156579 @default.
• W3048956034 creator A5084749618 @default.
• W3048956034 date "2020-11-01" @default.
• W3048956034 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W3048956034 title "Assessing patient understanding of their antimicrobial treatment: How are we doing and how might we improve?" @default.
• W3048956034 cites W1993731153 @default.
• W3048956034 cites W1999422537 @default.
• W3048956034 cites W2003576326 @default.
• W3048956034 cites W2014295628 @default.
• W3048956034 cites W2045829512 @default.
• W3048956034 cites W2050484705 @default.
• W3048956034 cites W2061496261 @default.
• W3048956034 cites W2062325894 @default.
• W3048956034 cites W2086095082 @default.
• W3048956034 cites W2086263287 @default.
• W3048956034 cites W2128748796 @default.
• W3048956034 cites W2139272690 @default.
• W3048956034 cites W2149652906 @default.
• W3048956034 cites W2159143686 @default.
• W3048956034 cites W2159747858 @default.
• W3048956034 cites W2918024659 @default.
• W3048956034 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idh.2020.07.003" @default.
• W3048956034 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32792299" @default.
• W3048956034 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3048956034 type Work @default.
• W3048956034 sameAs 3048956034 @default.
• W3048956034 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W3048956034 countsByYear W30489560342021 @default.
• W3048956034 countsByYear W30489560342022 @default.
• W3048956034 countsByYear W30489560342023 @default.
• W3048956034 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3048956034 hasAuthorship W3048956034A5026216873 @default.
• W3048956034 hasAuthorship W3048956034A5058937834 @default.
• W3048956034 hasAuthorship W3048956034A5060156579 @default.
• W3048956034 hasAuthorship W3048956034A5084749618 @default.
• W3048956034 hasConcept C177713679 @default.
• W3048956034 hasConcept C4937899 @default.
• W3048956034 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3048956034 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W3048956034 hasConcept C89423630 @default.
• W3048956034 hasConceptScore W3048956034C177713679 @default.
• W3048956034 hasConceptScore W3048956034C4937899 @default.
• W3048956034 hasConceptScore W3048956034C71924100 @default.
• W3048956034 hasConceptScore W3048956034C86803240 @default.
• W3048956034 hasConceptScore W3048956034C89423630 @default.
• W3048956034 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W3048956034 hasLocation W30489560341 @default.
• W3048956034 hasOpenAccess W3048956034 @default.
• W3048956034 hasPrimaryLocation W30489560341 @default.
• W3048956034 hasRelatedWork W1980615853 @default.
• W3048956034 hasRelatedWork W1998378687 @default.
• W3048956034 hasRelatedWork W2034203825 @default.
• W3048956034 hasRelatedWork W2108429200 @default.
• W3048956034 hasRelatedWork W2161483215 @default.
• W3048956034 hasRelatedWork W2414740056 @default.
• W3048956034 hasRelatedWork W2415858186 @default.
• W3048956034 hasRelatedWork W2890635720 @default.
• W3048956034 hasRelatedWork W3042669029 @default.
• W3048956034 hasRelatedWork W4252371801 @default.
• W3048956034 hasVolume "25" @default.
• W3048956034 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3048956034 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3048956034 magId "3048956034" @default.
• W3048956034 workType "article" @default.