FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3049083622> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3049083622 endingPage "5342" @default.
• W3049083622 startingPage "5333" @default.
• W3049083622 abstract "Purpose 99mTc-MAA-SPECT/CT may be used in 90Y-glass microsphere radioembolization treatment planning to assess perfused liver volumes and absorbed dose distributions. The partition model (PM) offers a more detailed planning dosimetry option beyond the single-compartment model more traditionally used in 90Y radioembolization. As 90Y radioembolization treatments shift toward activities and doses that aim to achieve tumor control, accurate and reliable treatment planning dosimetry for both tumors and normal liver (NL) becomes more critical. In this work, we explore the accuracy and precision of 90Y dosimetry predictions from pretherapy 99mTc-MAA and PM. Methods Both PM and voxel dosimetry models were used to calculate tumor and NL mean doses using both planning 99mTc-MAA and verification 90Y-SPECT/CT in this retrospective analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma cases treated with glass microspheres (NCT01900002, n = 32). Linear regression models were developed at first access, and then later correct, the estimates by (a) 99mTc-MAA for 90Y voxel dosimetry and (b) 99mTc-MAA PM for voxel dosimetry, separately for both tumors and NL. Bland-Altman analysis was then used to evaluate the accuracy and precision of the regression model predictions with the mean bias and 95% prediction intervals (PI, ±1.96σ). Two categories of cases were stratified (catheter matched vs catheter unmatched) by establishing the level of 99mTc-MAA and 90Y catheter position alignment. Only catheter-matched cases were included in the 99mTc-MAA vs 90Y voxel dosimetry comparison, while all cases were used to compare dosimetry models (PM vs voxel). Results Half (16/32) of cases were deemed catheter matched. 99mTc-MAA could reliably predict NL doses in catheter-matched cases after application of the linear model, with mean bias (PI) of −1% (±31%). PM was equivalent to voxel dosimetry for NL doses with mean bias (PI) of 0% (±1%). Even among catheter-matched cases, 99mTc-MAA planning for 90Y tumor voxel doses was poor, overestimating dose by an average of nearly 40%. Upon application of the linear model, 99mTc-MAA predictions for 90Y tumor voxel dose were only minimally biased (−4%) but possessed very large PI (±104%). PM predictions for tumor voxel dose using the linear model also showed small bias (−6%) but maintained similarly high PI of ±90%. Cases with tumors representing a large majority (>80%) of the total tumor volume demonstrated the best scenarios for 99mTc-MAA and PM tumor dose predictions, with mean biases (PI) of −3% (±53%) and −4% (±21%), respectively. Conclusion The unconditional use of 99mTc-MAA to predict 90Y dosimetry across all cases is not recommended due to: (a) demonstrated the risk of unmatched catheter positions between procedures, and (b) large bias and uncertainty in 99mTc-MAA predictions in cases with matched catheter locations. However, NL voxel dose predictions with 99mTc-MAA are clinically viable and either PM or voxel dosimetry can be used to produce equivalent predictions. Both 99mTc-MAA and PM can provide tumor dose predictions with potential clinical utility, but only in catheter-matched cases and with tumors comprising a clear majority (>80%) of the total tumor volume. These findings stratify the predictive fidelity of 99mTc-MAA- and PM-based treatment planning for 90Y dosimetry in improving treatment outcomes." @default.
• W3049083622 created "2020-08-21" @default.
• W3049083622 creator A5000330987 @default.
• W3049083622 creator A5002142766 @default.
• W3049083622 creator A5046065062 @default.
• W3049083622 creator A5060573161 @default.
• W3049083622 creator A5062829409 @default.
• W3049083622 date "2020-09-09" @default.
• W3049083622 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W3049083622 title "Planning dosimetry for ⁹⁰ Y radioembolization with glass microspheres: Evaluating the fidelity of ^99m Tc‐MAA and partition model predictions" @default.
• W3049083622 cites W1972656626 @default.
• W3049083622 cites W1973076899 @default.
• W3049083622 cites W1996806813 @default.
• W3049083622 cites W2016199951 @default.
• W3049083622 cites W2052148672 @default.
• W3049083622 cites W2071602611 @default.
• W3049083622 cites W2077862300 @default.
• W3049083622 cites W2083149611 @default.
• W3049083622 cites W2088343836 @default.
• W3049083622 cites W2088974189 @default.
• W3049083622 cites W2103849118 @default.
• W3049083622 cites W2107079400 @default.
• W3049083622 cites W2133953889 @default.
• W3049083622 cites W2138023372 @default.
• W3049083622 cites W2148464313 @default.
• W3049083622 cites W2148574277 @default.
• W3049083622 cites W2154821025 @default.
• W3049083622 cites W2159759971 @default.
• W3049083622 cites W2166106543 @default.
• W3049083622 cites W2493685506 @default.
• W3049083622 cites W2512583028 @default.
• W3049083622 cites W2590837630 @default.
• W3049083622 cites W2770956202 @default.
• W3049083622 cites W2793988606 @default.
• W3049083622 cites W2806137905 @default.
• W3049083622 cites W2888500854 @default.
• W3049083622 cites W2908012835 @default.
• W3049083622 cites W2944477822 @default.
• W3049083622 cites W2963501763 @default.
• W3049083622 cites W2966802385 @default.
• W3049083622 cites W2967628593 @default.
• W3049083622 cites W771228274 @default.
• W3049083622 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.14452" @default.
• W3049083622 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32790882" @default.
• W3049083622 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3049083622 type Work @default.
• W3049083622 sameAs 3049083622 @default.
• W3049083622 citedByCount "22" @default.
• W3049083622 countsByYear W30490836222021 @default.
• W3049083622 countsByYear W30490836222022 @default.
• W3049083622 countsByYear W30490836222023 @default.
• W3049083622 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3049083622 hasAuthorship W3049083622A5000330987 @default.
• W3049083622 hasAuthorship W3049083622A5002142766 @default.
• W3049083622 hasAuthorship W3049083622A5046065062 @default.
• W3049083622 hasAuthorship W3049083622A5060573161 @default.
• W3049083622 hasAuthorship W3049083622A5062829409 @default.
• W3049083622 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W3049083622 hasConcept C201645570 @default.
• W3049083622 hasConcept C2780387249 @default.
• W3049083622 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W3049083622 hasConcept C509974204 @default.
• W3049083622 hasConcept C54170458 @default.
• W3049083622 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3049083622 hasConcept C75088862 @default.
• W3049083622 hasConceptScore W3049083622C126838900 @default.
• W3049083622 hasConceptScore W3049083622C201645570 @default.
• W3049083622 hasConceptScore W3049083622C2780387249 @default.
• W3049083622 hasConceptScore W3049083622C2989005 @default.
• W3049083622 hasConceptScore W3049083622C509974204 @default.
• W3049083622 hasConceptScore W3049083622C54170458 @default.
• W3049083622 hasConceptScore W3049083622C71924100 @default.
• W3049083622 hasConceptScore W3049083622C75088862 @default.
• W3049083622 hasIssue "10" @default.
• W3049083622 hasLocation W30490836221 @default.
• W3049083622 hasOpenAccess W3049083622 @default.
• W3049083622 hasPrimaryLocation W30490836221 @default.
• W3049083622 hasRelatedWork W1964713829 @default.
• W3049083622 hasRelatedWork W1984327976 @default.
• W3049083622 hasRelatedWork W2025656351 @default.
• W3049083622 hasRelatedWork W2076776398 @default.
• W3049083622 hasRelatedWork W2100602797 @default.
• W3049083622 hasRelatedWork W2810427070 @default.
• W3049083622 hasRelatedWork W2970329071 @default.
• W3049083622 hasRelatedWork W2975209670 @default.
• W3049083622 hasRelatedWork W3049083622 @default.
• W3049083622 hasRelatedWork W943309381 @default.
• W3049083622 hasVolume "47" @default.
• W3049083622 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3049083622 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3049083622 magId "3049083622" @default.
• W3049083622 workType "article" @default.