FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W305732082> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W305732082 startingPage "1119" @default.
• W305732082 abstract "The Supreme Court has long failed to provide guidance to lower courts as they seek to interpret the meaning of ambiguous congressional enactments. Thus it was no surprise that after Congress passed the Judicial Improvements Act of 1990, (1) courts began to split over language in 28 U.S.C. [section] 1367, (2) supplemental statute that appeared to grant courts sitting in diversity supplemental over claims brought parties who did not meet the amount-in-controversy requirement of 28 U.S.C. [section] 1332. (3) Last Term, in Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc., (4) the Supreme Court held that when the other elements of are satisfied and at least one plaintiff satisfies the amount-in-controversy requirement, section 1367 permits federal courts to exercise supplemental over the claims of additional plaintiffs in the same case or controversy, even when those claims are less than the jurisdictional amount specified in the statute setting forth the requirements for diversity (5) Disregarding the arguments advanced the four dissenting Justices, the majority not only held that section 1367 by its plain compelled this result, but also declared that the absence of in section 1367 rendered reference to the legislative history unnecessary. (6) Allapattah thus clarified that when the Court interprets statutes it considers unambiguous, it will consult only the statutory text to discern Congress's intent. This strong endorsement of textualism, combined with the majority's refusal to articulate definition of ambiguity sufficient to justify consultation of extratextual sources, suggests that the Court considers textualism (7) the theory of statutory interpretation that best comports with the Court's role as Congress's faithful agent. (8) Allapattah involved two consolidated cases. In the first, gas station owners, not all of whom met the $50,000 amount-incontroversy amount required at the time, won judgment against Exxon for intentional and systematic overcharging for fuel. (9) The trial court certified the case for interlocutory review to the Eleventh Circuit to decide the section 1367 question. (10) The Eleventh Circuit affirmed, finding that the new section 1367(a) intended a general grant of supplemental jurisdiction, which is then narrowed for diversity cases [section] 1367(b). (11) None of the exceptions in subsection (b), however, precluded grant of federal over members of class action, and so the court approved the exercise of supplemental jurisdiction, the rule of Zahn v. International Paper Co. (12) notwithstanding. (13) Allapattah's second case involved fourteen-year-old girl, Beatriz Blanco-Ortega, who had severely injured her finger on can of Star-Kist tuna. (14) Blanco-Ortega and her family filed separate products liability actions in federal court against StarKist Foods, Inc., asserting diversity under 28 U.S.C. [section] 1332. (15) Blanco-Ortega's suit alleged physical damages and pain and suffering; suits filed her relatives alleged associated emotional distress. (16) In response, Star-Kist argued, and the district court agreed, that none of the plaintiffs' claims met the $75,000 amount-in-controversy requirement; (17) the court dismissed the cases for lack of jurisdiction. (18) The First Circuit affirmed as to Blanco-Ortega's family members, but found her own claim sufficient to satisfy section 1332's $75,000 requirement. (19) The court then examined whether, on the basis of Blanco-Ortega's reinstated claim, section 1367's grant of supplemental permitted the family members' claims to proceed in federal court, (20) holding that Congress's use of the terms civil action and original jurisdiction signified Congressional intent to incorporate[] into [section] 1367 the longstanding, judicially developed doctrines that determined whether . …" @default.
• W305732082 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W305732082 creator A5054022495 @default.
• W305732082 date "2006-06-22" @default.
• W305732082 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W305732082 title "Defining the Court's Role as Faithful Agent in Statutory Interpretation: Exxon Mobil Corp. V. Allapattah Services, Inc" @default.
• W305732082 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
• W305732082 type Work @default.
• W305732082 sameAs 305732082 @default.
• W305732082 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W305732082 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W305732082 hasAuthorship W305732082A5054022495 @default.
• W305732082 hasConcept C158129432 @default.
• W305732082 hasConcept C17319257 @default.
• W305732082 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W305732082 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W305732082 hasConcept C2777553895 @default.
• W305732082 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
• W305732082 hasConcept C2779204856 @default.
• W305732082 hasConcept C46415393 @default.
• W305732082 hasConcept C56617239 @default.
• W305732082 hasConcept C87501996 @default.
• W305732082 hasConcept C97460637 @default.
• W305732082 hasConceptScore W305732082C158129432 @default.
• W305732082 hasConceptScore W305732082C17319257 @default.
• W305732082 hasConceptScore W305732082C17744445 @default.
• W305732082 hasConceptScore W305732082C199539241 @default.
• W305732082 hasConceptScore W305732082C2777553895 @default.
• W305732082 hasConceptScore W305732082C2778272461 @default.
• W305732082 hasConceptScore W305732082C2779204856 @default.
• W305732082 hasConceptScore W305732082C46415393 @default.
• W305732082 hasConceptScore W305732082C56617239 @default.
• W305732082 hasConceptScore W305732082C87501996 @default.
• W305732082 hasConceptScore W305732082C97460637 @default.
• W305732082 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W305732082 hasLocation W3057320821 @default.
• W305732082 hasOpenAccess W305732082 @default.
• W305732082 hasPrimaryLocation W3057320821 @default.
• W305732082 hasRelatedWork W112571564 @default.
• W305732082 hasRelatedWork W1492145993 @default.
• W305732082 hasRelatedWork W1525663016 @default.
• W305732082 hasRelatedWork W1589621658 @default.
• W305732082 hasRelatedWork W2203633206 @default.
• W305732082 hasRelatedWork W2475482243 @default.
• W305732082 hasRelatedWork W2597668198 @default.
• W305732082 hasRelatedWork W264924522 @default.
• W305732082 hasRelatedWork W2945948202 @default.
• W305732082 hasRelatedWork W302645440 @default.
• W305732082 hasRelatedWork W3122751706 @default.
• W305732082 hasRelatedWork W3155339059 @default.
• W305732082 hasRelatedWork W336402353 @default.
• W305732082 hasRelatedWork W840083088 @default.
• W305732082 hasRelatedWork W853427604 @default.
• W305732082 hasRelatedWork W172940862 @default.
• W305732082 hasRelatedWork W182175313 @default.
• W305732082 hasRelatedWork W2169776023 @default.
• W305732082 hasRelatedWork W2599155037 @default.
• W305732082 hasRelatedWork W3129898730 @default.
• W305732082 hasVolume "29" @default.
• W305732082 isParatext "false" @default.
• W305732082 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W305732082 magId "305732082" @default.
• W305732082 workType "article" @default.