FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3068049451> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3068049451 endingPage "e035058" @default.
• W3068049451 startingPage "e035058" @default.
• W3068049451 abstract "Objectives To examine whether the gender of applicants and peer reviewers and other factors influence peer review of grant proposals submitted to a national funding agency. Setting Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF). Design Cross-sectional analysis of peer review reports submitted from 2009 to 2016 using linear mixed effects regression models adjusted for research topic, applicant’s age, nationality, affiliation and calendar period. Participants External peer reviewers. Primary outcome measure Overall score on a scale from 1 (worst) to 6 (best). Results Analyses included 38 250 reports on 12 294 grant applications from medicine, architecture, biology, chemistry, economics, engineering, geology, history, linguistics, mathematics, physics, psychology and sociology submitted by 26 829 unique peer reviewers. In univariable analysis, male applicants received more favourable evaluation scores than female applicants (+0.18 points; 95% CI 0.14 to 0.23), and male reviewers awarded higher scores than female reviewers (+0.11; 95% CI 0.08 to 0.15). Applicant-nominated reviewers awarded higher scores than reviewers nominated by the SNSF (+0.53; 95% CI 0.50 to 0.56), and reviewers from outside of Switzerland more favourable scores than reviewers affiliated with Swiss institutions (+0.53; 95% CI 0.49 to 0.56). In multivariable analysis, differences between male and female applicants were attenuated (+0.08; 95% CI 0.04 to 0.13) whereas results changed little for source of nomination and affiliation of reviewers. The gender difference increased after September 2011, when new evaluation forms were introduced (p=0.033 from test of interaction). Conclusions Peer review of grant applications at SNSF might be prone to biases stemming from different applicant and reviewer characteristics. The SNSF abandoned the nomination of peer reviewers by applicants. The new form introduced in 2011 may inadvertently have given more emphasis to the applicant’s track record. We encourage other funders to conduct similar studies, in order to improve the evidence base for rational and fair research funding." @default.
• W3068049451 created "2020-08-24" @default.
• W3068049451 creator A5023984816 @default.
• W3068049451 creator A5048148559 @default.
• W3068049451 creator A5077161809 @default.
• W3068049451 creator A5080823014 @default.
• W3068049451 creator A5085918982 @default.
• W3068049451 creator A5088598257 @default.
• W3068049451 date "2020-08-01" @default.
• W3068049451 modified "2023-09-29" @default.
• W3068049451 title "Gender and other potential biases in peer review: cross-sectional analysis of 38 250 external peer review reports" @default.
• W3068049451 cites W1504922255 @default.
• W3068049451 cites W1534352363 @default.
• W3068049451 cites W1967379013 @default.
• W3068049451 cites W2005310455 @default.
• W3068049451 cites W2037185018 @default.
• W3068049451 cites W2061653610 @default.
• W3068049451 cites W2074978652 @default.
• W3068049451 cites W2098475129 @default.
• W3068049451 cites W2099817335 @default.
• W3068049451 cites W2132736842 @default.
• W3068049451 cites W2136945077 @default.
• W3068049451 cites W2414378065 @default.
• W3068049451 cites W2568515734 @default.
• W3068049451 cites W2618670206 @default.
• W3068049451 cites W2783564415 @default.
• W3068049451 cites W2800174757 @default.
• W3068049451 cites W2913543586 @default.
• W3068049451 cites W2977450776 @default.
• W3068049451 cites W2980336953 @default.
• W3068049451 cites W2914573188 @default.
• W3068049451 doi "https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035058" @default.
• W3068049451 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/7440717" @default.
• W3068049451 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32819934" @default.
• W3068049451 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3068049451 type Work @default.
• W3068049451 sameAs 3068049451 @default.
• W3068049451 citedByCount "18" @default.
• W3068049451 countsByYear W30680494512020 @default.
• W3068049451 countsByYear W30680494512021 @default.
• W3068049451 countsByYear W30680494512022 @default.
• W3068049451 countsByYear W30680494512023 @default.
• W3068049451 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3068049451 hasAuthorship W3068049451A5023984816 @default.
• W3068049451 hasAuthorship W3068049451A5048148559 @default.
• W3068049451 hasAuthorship W3068049451A5077161809 @default.
• W3068049451 hasAuthorship W3068049451A5080823014 @default.
• W3068049451 hasAuthorship W3068049451A5085918982 @default.
• W3068049451 hasAuthorship W3068049451A5088598257 @default.
• W3068049451 hasBestOaLocation W30680494511 @default.
• W3068049451 hasConcept C108170787 @default.
• W3068049451 hasConcept C138368954 @default.
• W3068049451 hasConcept C142052008 @default.
• W3068049451 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W3068049451 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W3068049451 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W3068049451 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W3068049451 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3068049451 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3068049451 hasConcept C2775925287 @default.
• W3068049451 hasConcept C2777267654 @default.
• W3068049451 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W3068049451 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W3068049451 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W3068049451 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3068049451 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W3068049451 hasConceptScore W3068049451C108170787 @default.
• W3068049451 hasConceptScore W3068049451C138368954 @default.
• W3068049451 hasConceptScore W3068049451C142052008 @default.
• W3068049451 hasConceptScore W3068049451C142724271 @default.
• W3068049451 hasConceptScore W3068049451C144024400 @default.
• W3068049451 hasConceptScore W3068049451C149923435 @default.
• W3068049451 hasConceptScore W3068049451C151730666 @default.
• W3068049451 hasConceptScore W3068049451C17744445 @default.
• W3068049451 hasConceptScore W3068049451C199539241 @default.
• W3068049451 hasConceptScore W3068049451C2775925287 @default.
• W3068049451 hasConceptScore W3068049451C2777267654 @default.
• W3068049451 hasConceptScore W3068049451C36289849 @default.
• W3068049451 hasConceptScore W3068049451C509550671 @default.
• W3068049451 hasConceptScore W3068049451C512399662 @default.
• W3068049451 hasConceptScore W3068049451C71924100 @default.
• W3068049451 hasConceptScore W3068049451C86803240 @default.
• W3068049451 hasFunder F4320320924 @default.
• W3068049451 hasIssue "8" @default.
• W3068049451 hasLocation W30680494511 @default.
• W3068049451 hasLocation W30680494512 @default.
• W3068049451 hasLocation W30680494513 @default.
• W3068049451 hasOpenAccess W3068049451 @default.
• W3068049451 hasPrimaryLocation W30680494511 @default.
• W3068049451 hasRelatedWork W1172028069 @default.
• W3068049451 hasRelatedWork W2004417791 @default.
• W3068049451 hasRelatedWork W2012981785 @default.
• W3068049451 hasRelatedWork W2020030232 @default.
• W3068049451 hasRelatedWork W2281356487 @default.
• W3068049451 hasRelatedWork W2316495515 @default.
• W3068049451 hasRelatedWork W2809075208 @default.
• W3068049451 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W3068049451 hasRelatedWork W3148049617 @default.

• next