FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W307773306> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W307773306 endingPage "107" @default.
• W307773306 startingPage "103" @default.
• W307773306 abstract "BOOK REVIEWS 103 the one hand, and ‘Vision,’ ‘Imagination,’ and ‘Prophecy’ on the other” (176), a distinction that tends to make creativity secondary. Blake’s writings repeatedly deny what Quinney sees as the fundamental reality of the self, and in seeking a usable Blake, Quinney limits the terms ofthat denial. She avoids examining his claims that his own vision is “two­ fold Always” and “fourfold” sometimes, or the references to “sensual en­ joyment” as a route to the “infinite.” She does not engage with the ex­ traordinary metamorphoses and births depicted in his mythology, in which relationships between mind, body and world-view are apparently subject to fundamental change. While the complex interrelations in Blake’s mythic universe can suggest that even the simplest cry from the heart may be con­ ditioned by the conceptions ofthe reasoning mind, or by the visions of the prophet, Quinney prefers to keep the “actual experience of subjectivity” ul­ timately apart from the conceptualizing intellect and the visionary imagina­ tion. While she brings to her studies a refreshing emphasis on Blake’s own capacity for doubt, she is inclined to discount the very sincerity ofhis faith. In her introduction she claims that Blake “flaunted his secular religiousness deliberately by constantly writing of God and Christ even though he was an atheist and unbeliever” (26). IfBlake is seen as an unbeliever and atheist, then his religious gestures, which look like signs of enthusiastic belief, be­ come instead a kind of affectation. To see Blake in this way is to turn him into the kind ofinsincere mocker he attacked with loathing. Ifone is going to characterize his distinctive beliefs as a form of atheism, it would be a good idea to examine those passages in his writings (e.g. the annotations to Bacon and Reynolds) in which Blake attacks atheism. But Quinney has lit­ tle time for such particulars. She is a fluent and perceptive critic, who illu­ minates some of the key problems addressed in Blake’s work. But some of the more challenging aspects of Blake’s thinking are either off her agenda or simply elude her. Andrew Lincoln Queen Mary, University of London Mary Favret. War at a Distance: Romanticism and the Making ofModem War­ time. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2010. Pp. 262. $60.00. In War at a Distance, Mary Favret proposes that we can understand British Romanticism as a wartime culture, one that is intimately suffused and de­ termined by the experience ofthose living during but not in a war. In part, her claim recognizes that Britain was almost constantly at war during the SiR, 51 (Spring 2012) 104 BOOK REVIEWS period, fighting in the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars and a series of smaller conflicts that reached across the British empire. Equally, however, Favret is concerned with the forms of distance, whether geo­ graphic or temporal, that were a central feature of Britain’s cultural re­ sponse to warfare. War was only apprehended in Britain through the media dissemination of images of remote conflicts. It is this experience of medi­ ated distant war, war as represented in newspapers, the theater, poetry, mil­ itary dictionaries and prophecies, that constitutes modern wartime. Her study describes how this wartime experience was felt and articulated during the Romantic period, a formative moment in our own contemporary re­ sponse to war. In addition to thus linking Romanticism to the broader study ofwartime literature, a field which to date has been almost entirely weighted towards the world wars of the twentieth century, Favret’s study also draws upon re­ cent work on the study of affect. In particular, she seeks to reconceptualize wartime, viewing it not as a bounded and comprehensible historical period but as an “affecting experience,” one that “resonates beyond the here and now” (i i). Indeed, she defines affect as a sense or awareness that exists out­ side of rational understanding and views wartime literature itself as an “at­ tempt to trace and give shape to such affect” (i i). She thus challenges the notion that Romantic writers were ignorant or oblivious of their era’s wars by arguing that they were in fact incapable of “confining catastrophe to a different..." @default.
• W307773306 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W307773306 creator A5036352081 @default.
• W307773306 date "2012-01-01" @default.
• W307773306 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W307773306 title "War at a Distance: Romanticism and the Making of Modem Wartime by Mary Favret" @default.
• W307773306 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/srm.2012.0046" @default.
• W307773306 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W307773306 type Work @default.
• W307773306 sameAs 307773306 @default.
• W307773306 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W307773306 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W307773306 hasAuthorship W307773306A5036352081 @default.
• W307773306 hasBestOaLocation W3077733061 @default.
• W307773306 hasConcept C107038049 @default.
• W307773306 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W307773306 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
• W307773306 hasConcept C133979268 @default.
• W307773306 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W307773306 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W307773306 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W307773306 hasConcept C161191863 @default.
• W307773306 hasConcept C27206212 @default.
• W307773306 hasConcept C2777855551 @default.
• W307773306 hasConcept C2778692574 @default.
• W307773306 hasConcept C2780146897 @default.
• W307773306 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W307773306 hasConceptScore W307773306C107038049 @default.
• W307773306 hasConceptScore W307773306C111472728 @default.
• W307773306 hasConceptScore W307773306C124952713 @default.
• W307773306 hasConceptScore W307773306C133979268 @default.
• W307773306 hasConceptScore W307773306C138885662 @default.
• W307773306 hasConceptScore W307773306C142362112 @default.
• W307773306 hasConceptScore W307773306C144024400 @default.
• W307773306 hasConceptScore W307773306C161191863 @default.
• W307773306 hasConceptScore W307773306C27206212 @default.
• W307773306 hasConceptScore W307773306C2777855551 @default.
• W307773306 hasConceptScore W307773306C2778692574 @default.
• W307773306 hasConceptScore W307773306C2780146897 @default.
• W307773306 hasConceptScore W307773306C41008148 @default.
• W307773306 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W307773306 hasLocation W3077733061 @default.
• W307773306 hasOpenAccess W307773306 @default.
• W307773306 hasPrimaryLocation W3077733061 @default.
• W307773306 hasRelatedWork W1574150182 @default.
• W307773306 hasRelatedWork W2039357412 @default.
• W307773306 hasRelatedWork W2076601628 @default.
• W307773306 hasRelatedWork W2325619541 @default.
• W307773306 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W307773306 hasRelatedWork W2805085711 @default.
• W307773306 hasRelatedWork W3153101646 @default.
• W307773306 hasRelatedWork W4310231326 @default.
• W307773306 hasRelatedWork W4312872933 @default.
• W307773306 hasRelatedWork W640328102 @default.
• W307773306 hasVolume "51" @default.
• W307773306 isParatext "false" @default.
• W307773306 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W307773306 magId "307773306" @default.
• W307773306 workType "article" @default.