Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W307982105> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 81 of
81
with 100 items per page.
- W307982105 endingPage "8" @default.
- W307982105 startingPage "5" @default.
- W307982105 abstract "Introduction The purpose of this study is to determine the extent to which academic practice and research management professionals publish in professional journals, and the reasons most often cited for not publishing. Often the development of a profession is, at least in part, assessed by the number and quality of original manuscripts published in professional journals (Nielsen-Thompson, et al., 1988). Additionally, it has been suggested that the quality of published research is a good measure of an institution's or organization's quality (Hexler, 1969), as well as a vehicle through which individuals share ideas and knowledge. This study's focus, therefore, will assist in measuring where we are today as administrative professionals by providing insight into why individuals do not write for publication. It will also determine factors that appear to be associated with writing for publication. Methods and Setting A survey was sent to members of two professional organizations: the Society of Research Administrators (SRA) and the Medical Group Management Association - Academic Practice Assembly (MGMA-APA). These organizations were chosen because their membership broadly represents the academic practice and research management population. MGMA, founded in 1926, maintains a membership that represents managers of nearly half of all the physicians involved in group practice. SPA maintains a widely diversified membership that includes management representation from industry and government as well as academic and medical organizations. A simple random sample was drawn from these two professional organizations resulting in the distribution of 274 surveys to SPA members and 66 surveys to MGMA-APA members. Questionnaire A survey was developed to solicit respondent demographics, such as number of years in the profession, title, salary range, level of education, and whether or not position was categorized as a faculty position. Additionally, specific information regarding publication attempts and successes was requested. Finally, several questions were posed assessing the respondent's feelings about publishing, such as if the individual felt that publishing would enhance professional image, increase marketability, or result in a higher salary. Results Of the 274 surveys sent to SPA members, 128 were returned (a 46.7% response rate); of the 66 sent to the MGMA-APA members, 34 were returned (a 51.5% response rate). Overall, a response rate of 47.6% (or 162 out of 340) was achieved. Of those responding to the survey, 32.1% responded that they had written an article for publication, 75% of which had been accepted for publication. An analysis of the demographics of the respondents showed that 10% had a faculty position, 44% had worked in the profession for 10 years or more, 31% had a current salary of $70,000 or more, and 56% had a 2-year graduate degree or higher. Further analysis showed that individuals with a faculty position were significantly more likely to write for publication than individuals in non-faculty positions (Table 1). Also, while there did not appear to be a significant link between length of in the profession and writing for publication (Table 2), salary and education did appear to be significantly associated with writing for publication (Tables 3 and 4, respectively). Of the respondents who indicated that they had not submitted an article for publication, 34.8% cited no time as the major reason, while 23.3% cited no encouragement and 22.9% cited don't know how. Only 14.9% indicated no interest. Lastly, responses to the three opinion questions (Will publishing enhance your professional image?; Will publishing further your career?; and Will publishing result in a higher salary?) appeared to vary depending upon whether or not the respondent had ever written for publication. If the respondent had written for publication, he or she was more likely to feel it would enhance his or her professional image and career development. …" @default.
- W307982105 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W307982105 creator A5073434740 @default.
- W307982105 date "1994-09-22" @default.
- W307982105 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
- W307982105 title "To Publish or Not" @default.
- W307982105 hasPublicationYear "1994" @default.
- W307982105 type Work @default.
- W307982105 sameAs 307982105 @default.
- W307982105 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W307982105 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W307982105 hasAuthorship W307982105A5073434740 @default.
- W307982105 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
- W307982105 hasConcept C134215751 @default.
- W307982105 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W307982105 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W307982105 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
- W307982105 hasConcept C151719136 @default.
- W307982105 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W307982105 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W307982105 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W307982105 hasConcept C2778137410 @default.
- W307982105 hasConcept C2779530757 @default.
- W307982105 hasConcept C2780510313 @default.
- W307982105 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
- W307982105 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
- W307982105 hasConcept C41458344 @default.
- W307982105 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
- W307982105 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
- W307982105 hasConcept C51067260 @default.
- W307982105 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W307982105 hasConceptScore W307982105C111472728 @default.
- W307982105 hasConceptScore W307982105C134215751 @default.
- W307982105 hasConceptScore W307982105C138885662 @default.
- W307982105 hasConceptScore W307982105C144024400 @default.
- W307982105 hasConceptScore W307982105C149923435 @default.
- W307982105 hasConceptScore W307982105C151719136 @default.
- W307982105 hasConceptScore W307982105C15744967 @default.
- W307982105 hasConceptScore W307982105C17744445 @default.
- W307982105 hasConceptScore W307982105C199539241 @default.
- W307982105 hasConceptScore W307982105C2778137410 @default.
- W307982105 hasConceptScore W307982105C2779530757 @default.
- W307982105 hasConceptScore W307982105C2780510313 @default.
- W307982105 hasConceptScore W307982105C2908647359 @default.
- W307982105 hasConceptScore W307982105C39549134 @default.
- W307982105 hasConceptScore W307982105C41458344 @default.
- W307982105 hasConceptScore W307982105C41895202 @default.
- W307982105 hasConceptScore W307982105C509550671 @default.
- W307982105 hasConceptScore W307982105C51067260 @default.
- W307982105 hasConceptScore W307982105C71924100 @default.
- W307982105 hasIssue "2" @default.
- W307982105 hasLocation W3079821051 @default.
- W307982105 hasOpenAccess W307982105 @default.
- W307982105 hasPrimaryLocation W3079821051 @default.
- W307982105 hasRelatedWork W130550124 @default.
- W307982105 hasRelatedWork W1448307091 @default.
- W307982105 hasRelatedWork W152909377 @default.
- W307982105 hasRelatedWork W1582814552 @default.
- W307982105 hasRelatedWork W1956414982 @default.
- W307982105 hasRelatedWork W1970902273 @default.
- W307982105 hasRelatedWork W223642191 @default.
- W307982105 hasRelatedWork W2398125702 @default.
- W307982105 hasRelatedWork W2525758407 @default.
- W307982105 hasRelatedWork W282241766 @default.
- W307982105 hasRelatedWork W2890880209 @default.
- W307982105 hasRelatedWork W292513279 @default.
- W307982105 hasRelatedWork W2951094805 @default.
- W307982105 hasRelatedWork W3013341949 @default.
- W307982105 hasRelatedWork W3017465263 @default.
- W307982105 hasRelatedWork W3124847248 @default.
- W307982105 hasRelatedWork W3133312003 @default.
- W307982105 hasRelatedWork W68291221 @default.
- W307982105 hasRelatedWork W70727626 @default.
- W307982105 hasRelatedWork W303437984 @default.
- W307982105 hasVolume "26" @default.
- W307982105 isParatext "false" @default.
- W307982105 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W307982105 magId "307982105" @default.
- W307982105 workType "article" @default.