FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3080412445> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3080412445 endingPage "5" @default.
• W3080412445 startingPage "4" @default.
• W3080412445 abstract "The COVID-19 pandemic has created unique challenges for resuscitation teams responding to cardiac arrests. In response, the American Heart Association and European Resuscitation Council have released new guidance to help navigate these challenges. Specific mention was made to consider mechanical chest compression devices to reduce the number of providers needed during the resuscitation.1Edelson D.P. Sasson C. Chan P.S. et al.Interim guidance for basic and advanced life support in adults, children, and neonates with suspected or confirmed COVID-19.Circulation. 2020; : 141https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.120.047463Crossref Google Scholar, 2Nolan J. Monsieurs K. Bossaert L. et al.European Resuscitation Council COVID-19 guidelines executive summary.Resuscitation. 2020; 153: 45-55https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.06.001Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (197) Google Scholar This guidance builds upon prior consensus on science and guidelines recommending against routine use of mechanical chest compression devices, outside of arrests where sustained high-quality manual compressions is impractical or a threat to provider safety.3Perkins G. Morley P. Nolan J. et al.International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation: COVID-19 consensus on science, treatment recommendations and task force insights.Resuscitation. 2020; 151: 145-147https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.04.035Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (94) Google Scholar, 4Callaway C.W. Soar J. Aibiki M. et al.Part 4: Advanced Life Support: 2015 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations.Circulation. 2015; : 132https://doi.org/10.1161/cir.0000000000000273Crossref PubMed Google Scholar In general, the quality of data regarding the safety/efficacy of mechanical chest compression devices for in-hospital arrest is low.5Couper K. Yeung J. Nicholson T. Quinn T. Lall R. Perkins G.D. Mechanical chest compression devices at in-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Resuscitation. 2016; 103: 24-31https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.03.004Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (35) Google Scholar Explored here are our experiences with rapid implementation of the LUCAS® chest compression system at a tertiary care hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic. The LUCAS® device was introduced in April 2020. In total, 23 in-person training events were held and were attended by 126 nurses and 30 physicians. A video learning module was released to all potential code team responders and was completed by 555 individuals. Twenty-one in-hospital cardiac arrests (IHCA) occurred between April and June 2020. In June 2020, a survey exploring the attitudes and experiences with the device (see supplement data) was sent to nurse and physician code leaders identified via intra-arrest documentation. Ultimately, 44/76 (58%) participants responded, distributed roughly evenly between nurses (34%), code leaders (32%), and attending physicians (34%). Ultimately, 32 (73%) responders had been involved in an event where the LUCAS® device was deployed. On a five-point Likert scale ranging from ‘Strongly Disagree’ to ‘Strongly Agree,’ more than half of participants strongly agreed that the LUCAS® reduced the number of individuals needed in the room (56%), improved the quality of chest compressions (59%), and led to a more controlled resuscitation experience (59%). Of the surveys where the LUCAS® was deployed, 12 (37%) participants agreed/strongly agreed that the LUCAS® led to delays in patient care, while 12 (37%) participants disagreed/strongly disagreed that it resulted in delays. The largest barrier identified during use of the LUCAS® was concern for patient size and patient transfer onto the LUCAS® backboard. Of the 20 (45%) participants who were involved in an event during the pandemic where the LUCAS® was not deployed, 8 (40%) participants specifically mentioned it was not utilized due to concerns regarding patient size, while 7 (35%) participants noted that by the time of deployment, the patient had return of spontaneous circulation. These survey results show generally positive responses despite rapid implementation of the LUCAS® device. The goal of creating a safer and more controlled resuscitation effort was appreciated by participants. Participants also identified avenues for further improvement. Specific suggestions included more training sessions with emphasis on patients of various body habitus, and transitioning patients to the LUCAS® backboard in hopes of decreasing delays in care. Overall, these survey results show prompt introduction of the LUCAS® device during the COVID-19 pandemic is feasible, but further technical enhancements and hospital staff training are needed to achieve optimal results. All authors have made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the study, acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data. All authors reviewed the manuscript and revised it for intellectual content. All authors approved the manuscript prior to submission. None declared. None declared." @default.
• W3080412445 created "2020-09-01" @default.
• W3080412445 creator A5014345315 @default.
• W3080412445 creator A5015606562 @default.
• W3080412445 creator A5025126436 @default.
• W3080412445 creator A5026116818 @default.
• W3080412445 creator A5082517291 @default.
• W3080412445 creator A5089486992 @default.
• W3080412445 creator A5090386799 @default.
• W3080412445 date "2020-11-01" @default.
• W3080412445 modified "2023-10-11" @default.
• W3080412445 title "Rapid implementation of a mechanical chest compression device for in-hospital cardiac arrest during the COVID-19 pandemic" @default.
• W3080412445 cites W2294943887 @default.
• W3080412445 cites W3023009954 @default.
• W3080412445 cites W3033709386 @default.
• W3080412445 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.08.122" @default.
• W3080412445 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/7455518" @default.
• W3080412445 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32866550" @default.
• W3080412445 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3080412445 type Work @default.
• W3080412445 sameAs 3080412445 @default.
• W3080412445 citedByCount "6" @default.
• W3080412445 countsByYear W30804124452021 @default.
• W3080412445 countsByYear W30804124452022 @default.
• W3080412445 countsByYear W30804124452023 @default.
• W3080412445 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3080412445 hasAuthorship W3080412445A5014345315 @default.
• W3080412445 hasAuthorship W3080412445A5015606562 @default.
• W3080412445 hasAuthorship W3080412445A5025126436 @default.
• W3080412445 hasAuthorship W3080412445A5026116818 @default.
• W3080412445 hasAuthorship W3080412445A5082517291 @default.
• W3080412445 hasAuthorship W3080412445A5089486992 @default.
• W3080412445 hasAuthorship W3080412445A5090386799 @default.
• W3080412445 hasBestOaLocation W30804124451 @default.
• W3080412445 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3080412445 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W3080412445 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3080412445 hasConcept C194828623 @default.
• W3080412445 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3080412445 hasConcept C2776957806 @default.
• W3080412445 hasConcept C2777055891 @default.
• W3080412445 hasConcept C2778165595 @default.
• W3080412445 hasConcept C2779084015 @default.
• W3080412445 hasConcept C2779134260 @default.
• W3080412445 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W3080412445 hasConcept C3008058167 @default.
• W3080412445 hasConcept C524204448 @default.
• W3080412445 hasConcept C545542383 @default.
• W3080412445 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3080412445 hasConcept C83867959 @default.
• W3080412445 hasConcept C89623803 @default.
• W3080412445 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W3080412445 hasConceptScore W3080412445C126322002 @default.
• W3080412445 hasConceptScore W3080412445C166957645 @default.
• W3080412445 hasConceptScore W3080412445C17744445 @default.
• W3080412445 hasConceptScore W3080412445C194828623 @default.
• W3080412445 hasConceptScore W3080412445C199539241 @default.
• W3080412445 hasConceptScore W3080412445C2776957806 @default.
• W3080412445 hasConceptScore W3080412445C2777055891 @default.
• W3080412445 hasConceptScore W3080412445C2778165595 @default.
• W3080412445 hasConceptScore W3080412445C2779084015 @default.
• W3080412445 hasConceptScore W3080412445C2779134260 @default.
• W3080412445 hasConceptScore W3080412445C2779473830 @default.
• W3080412445 hasConceptScore W3080412445C3008058167 @default.
• W3080412445 hasConceptScore W3080412445C524204448 @default.
• W3080412445 hasConceptScore W3080412445C545542383 @default.
• W3080412445 hasConceptScore W3080412445C71924100 @default.
• W3080412445 hasConceptScore W3080412445C83867959 @default.
• W3080412445 hasConceptScore W3080412445C89623803 @default.
• W3080412445 hasConceptScore W3080412445C95457728 @default.
• W3080412445 hasLocation W30804124451 @default.
• W3080412445 hasLocation W30804124452 @default.
• W3080412445 hasOpenAccess W3080412445 @default.
• W3080412445 hasPrimaryLocation W30804124451 @default.
• W3080412445 hasRelatedWork W13225969 @default.
• W3080412445 hasRelatedWork W2176568680 @default.
• W3080412445 hasRelatedWork W2323372187 @default.
• W3080412445 hasRelatedWork W2469006183 @default.
• W3080412445 hasRelatedWork W3135778302 @default.
• W3080412445 hasRelatedWork W3165826441 @default.
• W3080412445 hasRelatedWork W4248062275 @default.
• W3080412445 hasRelatedWork W4293315422 @default.
• W3080412445 hasRelatedWork W4300529907 @default.
• W3080412445 hasRelatedWork W2182960392 @default.
• W3080412445 hasVolume "156" @default.
• W3080412445 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3080412445 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3080412445 magId "3080412445" @default.
• W3080412445 workType "article" @default.