FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3080552144> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3080552144 endingPage "1227" @default.
• W3080552144 startingPage "1217" @default.
• W3080552144 abstract "Background Bowel preparation for colonoscopy is often poorly tolerated due to poor palatability and adverse effects. This can negatively impact on the patient experience and on the quality of bowel preparation. This systematic review and meta‐analysis was carried out to assess whether adjuncts to bowel preparation affected palatability, tolerability and quality of bowel preparation (bowel cleanliness). Methods A systematic search strategy was conducted on PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews to identify studies evaluating adjunct use for colonoscopic bowel preparation. Studies comparing different regimens and volumes were excluded. Specific outcomes studied included palatability (taste), willingness to repeat bowel preparation, gastrointestinal adverse events and the quality of bowel preparation. Data across studies were pooled using a random‐effects model and heterogeneity assessed using I 2 ‐statistics. Results Of 467 studies screened, six were included for analysis (all single‐blind randomised trials; n = 1187 patients). Adjuncts comprised citrus reticulata peel, orange juice, menthol candy drops, simethicone, Coke Zero and sugar‐free chewing gum. Overall, adjunct use was associated with improved palatability (mean difference 0.62, 95% confidence interval 0.29–0.96, p < 0.001) on a scale of 0–5, acceptability of taste (odds ratio 2.75, 95% confidence interval: 1.52–4.95, p < 0.001) and willingness to repeat bowel preparation (odds ratio 2.92, 95% confidence interval: 1.97–4.35, p < 0.001). Patients in the adjunct group reported lower rates of bloating (odds ratio 0.48, 95% confidence interval: 0.29–0.77, p = 0.003) and vomiting (odds ratio 0.47, 95% confidence interval 0.27–0.81, p = 0.007), but no difference in nausea ( p = 0.10) or abdominal pain ( p = 0.62). Adjunct use resulted in superior bowel cleanliness (odds ratio 2.52, 95% confidence interval: 1.31–4.85, p = 0.006). Heterogeneity varied across outcomes, ranging from 0% (vomiting) to 81% (palatability), without evidence of publication bias. The overall quality of evidence was rated moderate. Conclusion In this meta‐analysis, the use of adjuncts was associated with better palatability, less vomiting and bloating, willingness to repeat bowel preparation and superior quality of bowel preparation. The addition of adjuncts to bowel preparation may improve outcomes of colonoscopy and the overall patient experience." @default.
• W3080552144 created "2020-09-01" @default.
• W3080552144 creator A5002550053 @default.
• W3080552144 creator A5010924950 @default.
• W3080552144 creator A5033821337 @default.
• W3080552144 creator A5079366091 @default.
• W3080552144 creator A5080292554 @default.
• W3080552144 date "2020-01-12" @default.
• W3080552144 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W3080552144 title "Can adjuncts to bowel preparation for colonoscopy improve patient experience and result in superior bowel cleanliness? A systematic review and meta‐analysis" @default.
• W3080552144 cites W1967729368 @default.
• W3080552144 cites W1997457154 @default.
• W3080552144 cites W2014381983 @default.
• W3080552144 cites W2038162182 @default.
• W3080552144 cites W2052187695 @default.
• W3080552144 cites W2057426617 @default.
• W3080552144 cites W2066406304 @default.
• W3080552144 cites W2067671146 @default.
• W3080552144 cites W2068113774 @default.
• W3080552144 cites W2078345561 @default.
• W3080552144 cites W2111309854 @default.
• W3080552144 cites W2138134327 @default.
• W3080552144 cites W2141209055 @default.
• W3080552144 cites W2198744634 @default.
• W3080552144 cites W2276926410 @default.
• W3080552144 cites W2311114858 @default.
• W3080552144 cites W2321693498 @default.
• W3080552144 cites W2387125024 @default.
• W3080552144 cites W2421035272 @default.
• W3080552144 cites W2470798381 @default.
• W3080552144 cites W2530444951 @default.
• W3080552144 cites W2765283803 @default.
• W3080552144 cites W2929202169 @default.
• W3080552144 cites W2958754876 @default.
• W3080552144 cites W3017520899 @default.
• W3080552144 doi "https://doi.org/10.1177/2050640620953224" @default.
• W3080552144 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/7724533" @default.
• W3080552144 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32838693" @default.
• W3080552144 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3080552144 type Work @default.
• W3080552144 sameAs 3080552144 @default.
• W3080552144 citedByCount "6" @default.
• W3080552144 countsByYear W30805521442021 @default.
• W3080552144 countsByYear W30805521442022 @default.
• W3080552144 countsByYear W30805521442023 @default.
• W3080552144 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3080552144 hasAuthorship W3080552144A5002550053 @default.
• W3080552144 hasAuthorship W3080552144A5010924950 @default.
• W3080552144 hasAuthorship W3080552144A5033821337 @default.
• W3080552144 hasAuthorship W3080552144A5079366091 @default.
• W3080552144 hasAuthorship W3080552144A5080292554 @default.
• W3080552144 hasBestOaLocation W30805521441 @default.
• W3080552144 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W3080552144 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3080552144 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W3080552144 hasConcept C156957248 @default.
• W3080552144 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W3080552144 hasConcept C172873279 @default.
• W3080552144 hasConcept C197934379 @default.
• W3080552144 hasConcept C2778435480 @default.
• W3080552144 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W3080552144 hasConcept C526805850 @default.
• W3080552144 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3080552144 hasConcept C90924648 @default.
• W3080552144 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W3080552144 hasConceptScore W3080552144C121608353 @default.
• W3080552144 hasConceptScore W3080552144C126322002 @default.
• W3080552144 hasConceptScore W3080552144C142724271 @default.
• W3080552144 hasConceptScore W3080552144C156957248 @default.
• W3080552144 hasConceptScore W3080552144C168563851 @default.
• W3080552144 hasConceptScore W3080552144C172873279 @default.
• W3080552144 hasConceptScore W3080552144C197934379 @default.
• W3080552144 hasConceptScore W3080552144C2778435480 @default.
• W3080552144 hasConceptScore W3080552144C44249647 @default.
• W3080552144 hasConceptScore W3080552144C526805850 @default.
• W3080552144 hasConceptScore W3080552144C71924100 @default.
• W3080552144 hasConceptScore W3080552144C90924648 @default.
• W3080552144 hasConceptScore W3080552144C95190672 @default.
• W3080552144 hasIssue "10" @default.
• W3080552144 hasLocation W30805521441 @default.
• W3080552144 hasLocation W30805521442 @default.
• W3080552144 hasLocation W30805521443 @default.
• W3080552144 hasLocation W30805521444 @default.
• W3080552144 hasOpenAccess W3080552144 @default.
• W3080552144 hasPrimaryLocation W30805521441 @default.
• W3080552144 hasRelatedWork W2053684250 @default.
• W3080552144 hasRelatedWork W2056922002 @default.
• W3080552144 hasRelatedWork W2058525341 @default.
• W3080552144 hasRelatedWork W2184315251 @default.
• W3080552144 hasRelatedWork W2286371484 @default.
• W3080552144 hasRelatedWork W2315379300 @default.
• W3080552144 hasRelatedWork W2324597509 @default.
• W3080552144 hasRelatedWork W2392303162 @default.
• W3080552144 hasRelatedWork W2403044859 @default.
• W3080552144 hasRelatedWork W2462220915 @default.
• W3080552144 hasVolume "8" @default.
• W3080552144 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3080552144 isRetracted "false" @default.

• next