Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3081036252> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 86 of
86
with 100 items per page.
- W3081036252 abstract "The formulation of science-driven space mission concepts is challenging – possibly even more so than the development and production of the space systems themselves. The formulation of these missions involves defining science objectives, surveying the state of the art of instrument capabilities, documenting the Program of Record and forecasting satellite lifetimes, defining feasible alternatives for spacecraft platforms and access to space, and identifying potentially enabled applications to cite only some of the tasks faced by mission design teams. The trade space is vast, especially in an era of novel platform concepts where constellations of SmallSats are changing the current paradigm of spaceborne observations. A crucial component of the formulation of science mission concepts is the assessment of the alternatives defined in this trade space. The assessment of the concepts is so complex that a heuristic approach does not sufficiently articulates the benefits of the alternatives under consideration. This complexity can be attributed to several factors. Science missions have to satisfy multiple science goals and their associated science objectives, therefore entering the realm of multi-criteria decision problems. In addition, multiple instruments, platforms, launchers, and ground system options are combined to define the architectures. The alternatives under assessment in these multi-criteria decision problems are numerous, as are the possible components of the segments that make up the architectures. Finally, stakeholders involved in the design and assessment of these science mission concepts have varying value systems: priorities relevant to stakeholders vary from group to group based on interests, objectives, and experiences. The complexity is such that the assessment requires a deliberate and structured approach to provide a comprehensive assessment of the mission concepts. This paper presents an approach that enables the assessment of the science benefits achieved by a space mission concept in the formulation phase. The approach combines Utility and Quality assessments provided by Subject Matter Experts to produce a Science Benefit score for each identified science objective. The paper discusses how this approach was tailored for the assessment of Observing Systems in the Aerosols, Cloud, Convection, and Precipitation (ACCP) study. In this Earth Science application, Utility quantifies how important a given geophysical variable is to addressing an identified science objective, while Quality quantifies how well an architecture obtains a geophysical variable with respect to Minimum levels listed in the Science Traceability Matrix. The resulting Benefit score articulates the science capability of a given architecture to address a given objective. This paper also presents the processes implemented to obtain the assessments from Subject Matter Experts in the ACCP study." @default.
- W3081036252 created "2020-09-01" @default.
- W3081036252 creator A5021878659 @default.
- W3081036252 creator A5054907574 @default.
- W3081036252 date "2020-03-01" @default.
- W3081036252 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
- W3081036252 title "Assessing the Science Benefit of Space Mission Concepts in the Formulation Phase" @default.
- W3081036252 cites W1524178131 @default.
- W3081036252 cites W1534612420 @default.
- W3081036252 cites W2006141708 @default.
- W3081036252 cites W2050101708 @default.
- W3081036252 cites W2050533700 @default.
- W3081036252 cites W2065959786 @default.
- W3081036252 cites W2163544927 @default.
- W3081036252 cites W2304018517 @default.
- W3081036252 cites W2792086996 @default.
- W3081036252 cites W3005115464 @default.
- W3081036252 cites W2337204297 @default.
- W3081036252 doi "https://doi.org/10.1109/aero47225.2020.9172755" @default.
- W3081036252 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
- W3081036252 type Work @default.
- W3081036252 sameAs 3081036252 @default.
- W3081036252 citedByCount "1" @default.
- W3081036252 countsByYear W30810362522021 @default.
- W3081036252 crossrefType "proceedings-article" @default.
- W3081036252 hasAuthorship W3081036252A5021878659 @default.
- W3081036252 hasAuthorship W3081036252A5054907574 @default.
- W3081036252 hasConcept C104060986 @default.
- W3081036252 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
- W3081036252 hasConcept C112930515 @default.
- W3081036252 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
- W3081036252 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
- W3081036252 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
- W3081036252 hasConcept C146978453 @default.
- W3081036252 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
- W3081036252 hasConcept C168167062 @default.
- W3081036252 hasConcept C173801870 @default.
- W3081036252 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W3081036252 hasConcept C17967879 @default.
- W3081036252 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W3081036252 hasConcept C201995342 @default.
- W3081036252 hasConcept C2778572836 @default.
- W3081036252 hasConcept C2778757428 @default.
- W3081036252 hasConcept C29829512 @default.
- W3081036252 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W3081036252 hasConcept C42475967 @default.
- W3081036252 hasConcept C539667460 @default.
- W3081036252 hasConcept C97355855 @default.
- W3081036252 hasConceptScore W3081036252C104060986 @default.
- W3081036252 hasConceptScore W3081036252C111919701 @default.
- W3081036252 hasConceptScore W3081036252C112930515 @default.
- W3081036252 hasConceptScore W3081036252C121332964 @default.
- W3081036252 hasConceptScore W3081036252C127413603 @default.
- W3081036252 hasConceptScore W3081036252C144133560 @default.
- W3081036252 hasConceptScore W3081036252C146978453 @default.
- W3081036252 hasConceptScore W3081036252C154945302 @default.
- W3081036252 hasConceptScore W3081036252C168167062 @default.
- W3081036252 hasConceptScore W3081036252C173801870 @default.
- W3081036252 hasConceptScore W3081036252C17744445 @default.
- W3081036252 hasConceptScore W3081036252C17967879 @default.
- W3081036252 hasConceptScore W3081036252C199539241 @default.
- W3081036252 hasConceptScore W3081036252C201995342 @default.
- W3081036252 hasConceptScore W3081036252C2778572836 @default.
- W3081036252 hasConceptScore W3081036252C2778757428 @default.
- W3081036252 hasConceptScore W3081036252C29829512 @default.
- W3081036252 hasConceptScore W3081036252C41008148 @default.
- W3081036252 hasConceptScore W3081036252C42475967 @default.
- W3081036252 hasConceptScore W3081036252C539667460 @default.
- W3081036252 hasConceptScore W3081036252C97355855 @default.
- W3081036252 hasLocation W30810362521 @default.
- W3081036252 hasOpenAccess W3081036252 @default.
- W3081036252 hasPrimaryLocation W30810362521 @default.
- W3081036252 hasRelatedWork W10319316 @default.
- W3081036252 hasRelatedWork W11116198 @default.
- W3081036252 hasRelatedWork W13793606 @default.
- W3081036252 hasRelatedWork W2073518 @default.
- W3081036252 hasRelatedWork W2173130 @default.
- W3081036252 hasRelatedWork W2675300 @default.
- W3081036252 hasRelatedWork W7765024 @default.
- W3081036252 hasRelatedWork W8726033 @default.
- W3081036252 hasRelatedWork W8771932 @default.
- W3081036252 hasRelatedWork W8812836 @default.
- W3081036252 isParatext "false" @default.
- W3081036252 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W3081036252 magId "3081036252" @default.
- W3081036252 workType "article" @default.