FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3081335895> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3081335895 abstract "The congress of the German Society of Urology reflects urologic research in German-speaking countries. The objective was to identify trends by analyzing the congress' abstracts and following full publications longitudinally.The abstracts of the 2016 congress were systematically analyzed regarding content, study design, cooperation, following full publications and journals which they were published in. Thereafter, the 2016 congress was compared to the 2002 and 2009 congresses. Statistical analysis included χ2-, Mann-Whitney U-, Cochran-Armitage-, and Kruskal-Wallis test.A total of 1073 abstracts were presented at the 2002, 2009, and 2016 congresses. We found an increase in abstracts regarding prostate disease (24.2%, 29.7%, and 34.0%; p = 0.0043), oncological abstracts (50.6%, 57.9%, and 61.7%; p = 0.003), multicenter studies (18.3, 28.6, and 34.3%; p < 0.0001) and cooperation (55.6%, 62.9%, and 70.5%, p < 0.0001). Experimental (29.0%, 33.2%, and 22.8%; p = 0.009) and prospective studies (62.1%, 42.0%, and 36.0%; p < 0.0001) declined. Abstracts including statistical analysis (18.4%, 14.7%, and 41.2%; p < 0.0001) and the impact factor of following full publications (2.08, 3.42, 4.42; p < 0.0001) rose. In 2016, 11.2% of those full publications were published Open Access. The publication rates of the presented abstracts were 49.1%, 56.3%, and 52.3%, respectively (p = 0.15).National and international networking of the urological research community has increased. Presentation of prospective studies has declined. The rate of peer-reviewed full publications following the DGU abstracts remains at a stable high level over the three congresses. The publication rate in Open Access journals is low.HINTERGRUND UND ZIEL DER ARBEIT: Der Jahreskongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Urologie (DGU) spiegelt die urologische Forschungslandschaft im deutschsprachigen Raum wider. Ziel war es, durch die longitudinale Analyse der Kongressabstracts und hervorgehenden Vollpublikationen Trends aufzudecken.Es erfolgte die systematische Analyse der Kongressabstracts des Jahreskongresses 2016 auf Inhalt, Studiendesign, Kooperationen, hervorgehenden Vollpublikationen sowie der veröffentlichenden Journalen. Hiernach erfolgte der Vergleich mit den Kongressen 2002 und 2009. Statistische Berechnungen erfolgten per χ2-, Mann-Whitney-U-, Cochran-Armitage- und Kruskal-Wallis-Test.Auf den Kongressen 2002, 2009 und 2016 wurden 1073 Abstracts präsentiert. Abstracts zu Prostataerkrankungen (24,2 %, 29,7 %, 34,0 %; p = 0,0043), onkologische Abstracts (50,6 %, 57,9 %, 61,7 %; p = 0,003), multizentrische Studien (18,3 %, 28,6 %, 34,3 %; p < 0,0001) und Kooperationsprojekte (55,6 %, 62,9 %, 70,5 %, p < 0,0001) nahmen zu, experimentelle (29,0 %, 33,2 %, 22,8 %; p = 0,009) und prospektive Arbeiten (62,1 %, 42,0 %, 36,0 %; p < 0,0001) ab. Statistische Analysen (18,4 %, 14,7 %, 41,2 %; p < 0,0001) und der „impact factor“ nachfolgender Vollpublikationen (2,08, 3,42, 4,42; p < 0,0001) stiegen. 2016 erfolgten 11,2 % dieser Vollpublikationen „open access“. Die Rate veröffentlichter Abstracts betrug 49,1 %, 56,3 % und 52,3 % (p = 0,15).Die nationale und internationale Vernetzung der urologischen Forschungsgemeinschaft nimmt zu, prospektive Studien werden weniger präsentiert. Die Rate aus DGU-Abstracts hervorgehender Vollpublikationen zeigt sich über die drei Kongresse auf hohem Niveau. Die Veröffentlichungsrate in Open-access-Journalen ist bisher gering." @default.
• W3081335895 created "2020-09-01" @default.
• W3081335895 creator A5008849909 @default.
• W3081335895 creator A5027146798 @default.
• W3081335895 creator A5041312722 @default.
• W3081335895 creator A5062392197 @default.
• W3081335895 creator A5077109548 @default.
• W3081335895 creator A5086632377 @default.
• W3081335895 date "2020-04-28" @default.
• W3081335895 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W3081335895 title "Urologische Forschung in Deutschland" @default.
• W3081335895 cites W1250763476 @default.
• W3081335895 cites W1565458470 @default.
• W3081335895 cites W1592653824 @default.
• W3081335895 cites W1797378710 @default.
• W3081335895 cites W1963526469 @default.
• W3081335895 cites W1964632939 @default.
• W3081335895 cites W1965067053 @default.
• W3081335895 cites W1972031884 @default.
• W3081335895 cites W1972902784 @default.
• W3081335895 cites W1975013389 @default.
• W3081335895 cites W2000675134 @default.
• W3081335895 cites W2008070836 @default.
• W3081335895 cites W2009161973 @default.
• W3081335895 cites W2045140167 @default.
• W3081335895 cites W2046175247 @default.
• W3081335895 cites W2064310756 @default.
• W3081335895 cites W2067728401 @default.
• W3081335895 cites W2080923140 @default.
• W3081335895 cites W2088821666 @default.
• W3081335895 cites W2094144521 @default.
• W3081335895 cites W2109976502 @default.
• W3081335895 cites W2127518828 @default.
• W3081335895 cites W2250548332 @default.
• W3081335895 cites W2741809807 @default.
• W3081335895 cites W2792955190 @default.
• W3081335895 cites W2803120221 @default.
• W3081335895 cites W2913740058 @default.
• W3081335895 cites W4252017059 @default.
• W3081335895 cites W51664676 @default.
• W3081335895 doi "https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-020-01206-9" @default.
• W3081335895 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32347325" @default.
• W3081335895 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3081335895 type Work @default.
• W3081335895 sameAs 3081335895 @default.
• W3081335895 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3081335895 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3081335895 hasAuthorship W3081335895A5008849909 @default.
• W3081335895 hasAuthorship W3081335895A5027146798 @default.
• W3081335895 hasAuthorship W3081335895A5041312722 @default.
• W3081335895 hasAuthorship W3081335895A5062392197 @default.
• W3081335895 hasAuthorship W3081335895A5077109548 @default.
• W3081335895 hasAuthorship W3081335895A5086632377 @default.
• W3081335895 hasBestOaLocation W30813358951 @default.
• W3081335895 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3081335895 hasConcept C154775046 @default.
• W3081335895 hasConcept C161191863 @default.
• W3081335895 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W3081335895 hasConcept C188816634 @default.
• W3081335895 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W3081335895 hasConcept C29456083 @default.
• W3081335895 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W3081335895 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W3081335895 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3081335895 hasConceptScore W3081335895C126322002 @default.
• W3081335895 hasConceptScore W3081335895C154775046 @default.
• W3081335895 hasConceptScore W3081335895C161191863 @default.
• W3081335895 hasConceptScore W3081335895C166957645 @default.
• W3081335895 hasConceptScore W3081335895C188816634 @default.
• W3081335895 hasConceptScore W3081335895C205649164 @default.
• W3081335895 hasConceptScore W3081335895C29456083 @default.
• W3081335895 hasConceptScore W3081335895C41008148 @default.
• W3081335895 hasConceptScore W3081335895C512399662 @default.
• W3081335895 hasConceptScore W3081335895C71924100 @default.
• W3081335895 hasLocation W30813358951 @default.
• W3081335895 hasLocation W30813358952 @default.
• W3081335895 hasOpenAccess W3081335895 @default.
• W3081335895 hasPrimaryLocation W30813358951 @default.
• W3081335895 hasRelatedWork W11790950 @default.
• W3081335895 hasRelatedWork W14942652 @default.
• W3081335895 hasRelatedWork W15908361 @default.
• W3081335895 hasRelatedWork W1681067 @default.
• W3081335895 hasRelatedWork W1798400 @default.
• W3081335895 hasRelatedWork W19634633 @default.
• W3081335895 hasRelatedWork W2430791 @default.
• W3081335895 hasRelatedWork W3967971 @default.
• W3081335895 hasRelatedWork W68534 @default.
• W3081335895 hasRelatedWork W7944714 @default.
• W3081335895 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3081335895 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3081335895 magId "3081335895" @default.
• W3081335895 workType "article" @default.