FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3082827948> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3082827948 endingPage "1135" @default.
• W3082827948 startingPage "1128" @default.
• W3082827948 abstract "Aims The rate of dislocation when traditional single bearing implants are used in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been reported to be between 8% and 10%. The use of dual mobility bearings can reduce this risk to between 0.5% and 2%. Dual mobility bearings are more expensive, and it is not clear if the additional clinical benefits constitute value for money for the payers. We aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of dual mobility compared with single bearings for patients undergoing revision THA. Methods We developed a Markov model to estimate the expected cost and benefits of dual mobility compared with single bearing implants in patients undergoing revision THA. The rates of revision and further revision were calculated from the National Joint Registry of England and Wales, while rates of transition from one health state to another were estimated from the literature, and the data were stratified by sex and age. Implant and healthcare costs were estimated from local procurement prices and national tariffs. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were calculated using published utility estimates for patients undergoing THA. Results At a minimum five-year follow-up, the use of dual mobility was cost-effective with an estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of between £3,006 and £18,745/QALY for patients aged < 55 years and between 64 and 75 years, respectively. For those aged > 75 years dual mobility was only cost-effective if the timeline was beyond seven years. The use of dual mobility bearings was cost-saving for patients aged < 75 years and cost-effective for those aged > 75 years if the time horizon was beyond ten years. Conclusion The use of dual mobility bearings is cost-effective compared with single bearings in patients undergoing revision THA. The younger the patient is, the more likely it is that a dual mobility bearing can be more cost-effective and even cost-saving. The results are affected by the time horizon and cost of bearings for those aged > 75 years. For patients aged > 75 years, the surgeon must decide whether the use of a dual mobility bearing is a viable economic and clinical option. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(9):1128–1135." @default.
• W3082827948 created "2020-09-08" @default.
• W3082827948 creator A5013038574 @default.
• W3082827948 creator A5013188923 @default.
• W3082827948 creator A5020622735 @default.
• W3082827948 creator A5039824563 @default.
• W3082827948 creator A5045391522 @default.
• W3082827948 creator A5047701036 @default.
• W3082827948 creator A5068626149 @default.
• W3082827948 date "2020-09-01" @default.
• W3082827948 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W3082827948 title "A cost-effectiveness assessment of dual-mobility bearings in revision hip arthroplasty" @default.
• W3082827948 cites W1247155451 @default.
• W3082827948 cites W1545593992 @default.
• W3082827948 cites W1570458780 @default.
• W3082827948 cites W1980929079 @default.
• W3082827948 cites W1999183245 @default.
• W3082827948 cites W2017119046 @default.
• W3082827948 cites W2024661152 @default.
• W3082827948 cites W2066874792 @default.
• W3082827948 cites W2076124522 @default.
• W3082827948 cites W2089154276 @default.
• W3082827948 cites W2116487198 @default.
• W3082827948 cites W2122664355 @default.
• W3082827948 cites W2125840055 @default.
• W3082827948 cites W2159953548 @default.
• W3082827948 cites W2161251761 @default.
• W3082827948 cites W2164654252 @default.
• W3082827948 cites W2166394031 @default.
• W3082827948 cites W2284638294 @default.
• W3082827948 cites W2465900603 @default.
• W3082827948 cites W2546525355 @default.
• W3082827948 cites W2612354601 @default.
• W3082827948 cites W2781717634 @default.
• W3082827948 cites W2794170769 @default.
• W3082827948 cites W2808810639 @default.
• W3082827948 cites W2884788207 @default.
• W3082827948 cites W2885241224 @default.
• W3082827948 cites W2895269052 @default.
• W3082827948 cites W2898982575 @default.
• W3082827948 cites W2911584749 @default.
• W3082827948 cites W2914185992 @default.
• W3082827948 cites W2942898297 @default.
• W3082827948 cites W2989026919 @default.
• W3082827948 cites W4242264349 @default.
• W3082827948 cites W4362192374 @default.
• W3082827948 doi "https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.102b9.bjj-2019-1742.r1" @default.
• W3082827948 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/7468559" @default.
• W3082827948 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32862681" @default.
• W3082827948 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3082827948 type Work @default.
• W3082827948 sameAs 3082827948 @default.
• W3082827948 citedByCount "17" @default.
• W3082827948 countsByYear W30828279482020 @default.
• W3082827948 countsByYear W30828279482021 @default.
• W3082827948 countsByYear W30828279482022 @default.
• W3082827948 countsByYear W30828279482023 @default.
• W3082827948 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3082827948 hasAuthorship W3082827948A5013038574 @default.
• W3082827948 hasAuthorship W3082827948A5013188923 @default.
• W3082827948 hasAuthorship W3082827948A5020622735 @default.
• W3082827948 hasAuthorship W3082827948A5039824563 @default.
• W3082827948 hasAuthorship W3082827948A5045391522 @default.
• W3082827948 hasAuthorship W3082827948A5047701036 @default.
• W3082827948 hasAuthorship W3082827948A5068626149 @default.
• W3082827948 hasBestOaLocation W30828279481 @default.
• W3082827948 hasConcept C112930515 @default.
• W3082827948 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3082827948 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W3082827948 hasConcept C21547014 @default.
• W3082827948 hasConcept C2778336525 @default.
• W3082827948 hasConcept C2781411149 @default.
• W3082827948 hasConcept C3019080777 @default.
• W3082827948 hasConcept C64332521 @default.
• W3082827948 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3082827948 hasConceptScore W3082827948C112930515 @default.
• W3082827948 hasConceptScore W3082827948C141071460 @default.
• W3082827948 hasConceptScore W3082827948C162324750 @default.
• W3082827948 hasConceptScore W3082827948C21547014 @default.
• W3082827948 hasConceptScore W3082827948C2778336525 @default.
• W3082827948 hasConceptScore W3082827948C2781411149 @default.
• W3082827948 hasConceptScore W3082827948C3019080777 @default.
• W3082827948 hasConceptScore W3082827948C64332521 @default.
• W3082827948 hasConceptScore W3082827948C71924100 @default.
• W3082827948 hasIssue "9" @default.
• W3082827948 hasLocation W30828279481 @default.
• W3082827948 hasLocation W30828279482 @default.
• W3082827948 hasOpenAccess W3082827948 @default.
• W3082827948 hasPrimaryLocation W30828279481 @default.
• W3082827948 hasRelatedWork W2006688237 @default.
• W3082827948 hasRelatedWork W2066257651 @default.
• W3082827948 hasRelatedWork W2300605477 @default.
• W3082827948 hasRelatedWork W2588098436 @default.
• W3082827948 hasRelatedWork W2615362569 @default.
• W3082827948 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W3082827948 hasRelatedWork W3035032397 @default.
• W3082827948 hasRelatedWork W3044297557 @default.
• W3082827948 hasRelatedWork W3082127840 @default.

• next