FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3083399900> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3083399900 endingPage "717" @default.
• W3083399900 startingPage "706" @default.
• W3083399900 abstract "Purpose The purpose of this systematic review is to examine the rates of postoperative recurrence of instability, functional outcomes, and complications after treatment with bone augmentation procedures or arthroscopic Bankart repair with remplissage for recurrent anterior shoulder instability in the setting of subcritical glenoid bone loss. Methods EMBASE, PubMed, and MEDLINE were searched from database inception until June 2019 for articles examining either bone block augmentation to the glenoid or Bankart repair with remplissage (BRR) in the setting of subcritical glenoid bone loss. Search and data extraction were performed by 2 reviewers independently and in duplicate. A separate analysis was done for comparative studies. Results Overall, 145 studies were identified, including 4 comparative studies. Across all studies, postoperative recurrence rates ranged from 0% to 42.8% for bone block augmentation and 0% to 15% for Bankart repair with remplissage. In comparative studies reporting subcritical glenoid bone loss, rates were 5.7% to 11.6% in the Latarjet group and 0% to 13.3% in the Bankart repair with remplissage group. However, in all studies reporting 10% to 15% mean glenoid bone loss, there was an increased rate of recurrent instability with arthroscopic soft tissue repair (6.1% to 13.2%) in comparison with bony augmentation (0% to 8.2%). Lastly, complication rates ranged from 0% to 66.7% for the bone block group and 0% to 2.3% for arthroscopic Bankart repair with remplissage. Conclusion Both bone block augmentation and Bankart repair with remplissage are effective treatment options for recurrent anterior shoulder instability in patients with bipolar bone loss but subcritical glenoid bone loss. Both have comparable functional outcomes, albeit bone block procedures carry an increased risk of complications. Arthroscopic BRR may be associated with a higher failure rate for preoperative glenoid bone loss >10%. Therefore, it may represent a stabilization procedure best suited for cases of recurrent anterior instability with glenoid bone loss <10% and the presence of a significant, off-track Hill-Sachs lesion. Level of Evidence Level IV, systematic review of Level II-IV studies. The purpose of this systematic review is to examine the rates of postoperative recurrence of instability, functional outcomes, and complications after treatment with bone augmentation procedures or arthroscopic Bankart repair with remplissage for recurrent anterior shoulder instability in the setting of subcritical glenoid bone loss. EMBASE, PubMed, and MEDLINE were searched from database inception until June 2019 for articles examining either bone block augmentation to the glenoid or Bankart repair with remplissage (BRR) in the setting of subcritical glenoid bone loss. Search and data extraction were performed by 2 reviewers independently and in duplicate. A separate analysis was done for comparative studies. Overall, 145 studies were identified, including 4 comparative studies. Across all studies, postoperative recurrence rates ranged from 0% to 42.8% for bone block augmentation and 0% to 15% for Bankart repair with remplissage. In comparative studies reporting subcritical glenoid bone loss, rates were 5.7% to 11.6% in the Latarjet group and 0% to 13.3% in the Bankart repair with remplissage group. However, in all studies reporting 10% to 15% mean glenoid bone loss, there was an increased rate of recurrent instability with arthroscopic soft tissue repair (6.1% to 13.2%) in comparison with bony augmentation (0% to 8.2%). Lastly, complication rates ranged from 0% to 66.7% for the bone block group and 0% to 2.3% for arthroscopic Bankart repair with remplissage. Both bone block augmentation and Bankart repair with remplissage are effective treatment options for recurrent anterior shoulder instability in patients with bipolar bone loss but subcritical glenoid bone loss. Both have comparable functional outcomes, albeit bone block procedures carry an increased risk of complications. Arthroscopic BRR may be associated with a higher failure rate for preoperative glenoid bone loss >10%. Therefore, it may represent a stabilization procedure best suited for cases of recurrent anterior instability with glenoid bone loss <10% and the presence of a significant, off-track Hill-Sachs lesion." @default.
• W3083399900 created "2020-09-11" @default.
• W3083399900 creator A5000316713 @default.
• W3083399900 creator A5030387331 @default.
• W3083399900 creator A5037730022 @default.
• W3083399900 creator A5047819427 @default.
• W3083399900 creator A5063617403 @default.
• W3083399900 creator A5073543995 @default.
• W3083399900 creator A5075603939 @default.
• W3083399900 creator A5078696104 @default.
• W3083399900 creator A5078770884 @default.
• W3083399900 date "2021-02-01" @default.
• W3083399900 modified "2023-10-15" @default.
• W3083399900 title "Arthroscopic Bankart Repair With Remplissage in Comparison to Bone Block Augmentation for Anterior Shoulder Instability With Bipolar Bone Loss: A Systematic Review" @default.
• W3083399900 cites W1186606699 @default.
• W3083399900 cites W1853862933 @default.
• W3083399900 cites W1891715101 @default.
• W3083399900 cites W1914414248 @default.
• W3083399900 cites W1966913420 @default.
• W3083399900 cites W2005844095 @default.
• W3083399900 cites W2007238130 @default.
• W3083399900 cites W2012550236 @default.
• W3083399900 cites W2013935021 @default.
• W3083399900 cites W2016516446 @default.
• W3083399900 cites W2017044005 @default.
• W3083399900 cites W2017345741 @default.
• W3083399900 cites W2022526704 @default.
• W3083399900 cites W2027630649 @default.
• W3083399900 cites W2036453497 @default.
• W3083399900 cites W2048412919 @default.
• W3083399900 cites W2052848285 @default.
• W3083399900 cites W2073902299 @default.
• W3083399900 cites W2081458385 @default.
• W3083399900 cites W2082199734 @default.
• W3083399900 cites W2088187638 @default.
• W3083399900 cites W2093524388 @default.
• W3083399900 cites W2097407525 @default.
• W3083399900 cites W2098923148 @default.
• W3083399900 cites W2101370196 @default.
• W3083399900 cites W2108553333 @default.
• W3083399900 cites W2117184169 @default.
• W3083399900 cites W2120081851 @default.
• W3083399900 cites W2120429369 @default.
• W3083399900 cites W2122831384 @default.
• W3083399900 cites W2134309351 @default.
• W3083399900 cites W2140686011 @default.
• W3083399900 cites W2147899020 @default.
• W3083399900 cites W2150817463 @default.
• W3083399900 cites W2151619658 @default.
• W3083399900 cites W2161374186 @default.
• W3083399900 cites W2164777277 @default.
• W3083399900 cites W2168409040 @default.
• W3083399900 cites W2178812409 @default.
• W3083399900 cites W2182799064 @default.
• W3083399900 cites W2186126057 @default.
• W3083399900 cites W2204276171 @default.
• W3083399900 cites W2308349407 @default.
• W3083399900 cites W2489157401 @default.
• W3083399900 cites W2532429610 @default.
• W3083399900 cites W2601611065 @default.
• W3083399900 cites W2610430919 @default.
• W3083399900 cites W2735407301 @default.
• W3083399900 cites W2739786203 @default.
• W3083399900 cites W2740765732 @default.
• W3083399900 cites W2766112900 @default.
• W3083399900 cites W2772993287 @default.
• W3083399900 cites W2884863193 @default.
• W3083399900 cites W2900103724 @default.
• W3083399900 cites W2906950853 @default.
• W3083399900 cites W2937508898 @default.
• W3083399900 cites W2938215002 @default.
• W3083399900 cites W2943561600 @default.
• W3083399900 cites W4237345897 @default.
• W3083399900 cites W4293079514 @default.
• W3083399900 cites W4299673826 @default.
• W3083399900 cites W603320602 @default.
• W3083399900 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2020.08.033" @default.
• W3083399900 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32911004" @default.
• W3083399900 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3083399900 type Work @default.
• W3083399900 sameAs 3083399900 @default.
• W3083399900 citedByCount "26" @default.
• W3083399900 countsByYear W30833999002021 @default.
• W3083399900 countsByYear W30833999002022 @default.
• W3083399900 countsByYear W30833999002023 @default.
• W3083399900 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3083399900 hasAuthorship W3083399900A5000316713 @default.
• W3083399900 hasAuthorship W3083399900A5030387331 @default.
• W3083399900 hasAuthorship W3083399900A5037730022 @default.
• W3083399900 hasAuthorship W3083399900A5047819427 @default.
• W3083399900 hasAuthorship W3083399900A5063617403 @default.
• W3083399900 hasAuthorship W3083399900A5073543995 @default.
• W3083399900 hasAuthorship W3083399900A5075603939 @default.
• W3083399900 hasAuthorship W3083399900A5078696104 @default.
• W3083399900 hasAuthorship W3083399900A5078770884 @default.
• W3083399900 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3083399900 hasConcept C2777307732 @default.
• W3083399900 hasConcept C2778436160 @default.

• next