FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3083480180> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3083480180 abstract "Research on the relationships between economic development, energy consumption, environmental pollution, and human health has tended to focus on the relationships between economic growth and air pollution, energy and air pollution, or the impact of air pollution on human health. However, there has been little past research focused on all the above associations.The few studies that have examined the interconnections between the economy, energy consumption, environmental pollution and health have tended to employ regression analyses, DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis), or DEA efficiency analyses; however, as these are static analysis tools, the analyses did not fully reveal the sustainable economic, energy, environmental or health developments over time, did not consider the regional differences, and most often ignored community health factors. To go some way to filling this gap, this paper developed a modified two stage Undesirable Meta Dynamic Network model to jointly analyze energy consumption, economic growth, air pollution and health treatment data in 31 Chinese high-income and upper-middle income cities from 2013-2016, for which the overall efficiency, production efficiency, healthcare resource utilization efficiency and technology gap ratio (TGR) for all input and output variables were calculated.It was found that: (1) the annual average overall efficiency in China's eastern region was the highest; (2) the production stage efficiencies were higher than the healthcare resource utilization stage efficiencies in most cities; (3) the high-income cities had lower TGRs than the upper-middle income cities; (4) the high-income cities had higher average energy consumption efficiencies than the upper-middle income cities; (5) the health expenditure efficiencies were the lowest of all inputs; (6) the high-income cities' respiratory disease and mortality rate efficiencies were higher than in the upper-middle income cities, which had improving mortality rate efficiencies; and (7) there were significant regional differences in the annual average input and output indicator efficiencies.First, the high-income cities had higher average efficiencies than the upper-middle income cities. Of the ten eastern region high-income cities, Guangzhou and Shanghai had average efficiencies of 1, with the least efficient being Shijiazhuang. In the other regions, the upper-middle income cities required greater technology and health treatment investments. Second, Guangzhou, Lhasa, Nanning, and Shanghai had production efficiencies of 1, and Guangzhou, Lhasa, Nanning, Shanghai and Fuzhou had healthcare resource utilization efficiencies of 1. As the average production stage efficiencies in most cities were higher than the healthcare resource utilization stage efficiencies, greater efforts are needed to improve the healthcare resource utilization. Third, the technology gap ratios (TGRs) in the high-income cities were slightly higher than in the upper-middle income cities. Therefore, the upper-middle income cities need to learn from the high-income cities to improve their general health treatment TGRs. Fourth, while the high-income cities had higher energy consumption efficiencies than the upper-middle income cities, these were decreasing in most cities. There were few respiratory disease efficiency differences between the high-income and upper-middle income cities, the high-income cities had falling mortality rate efficiencies, and the upper-middle income cities had increasing mortality rate efficiencies. Overall, therefore, most cities needed to strengthen their health governance to balance economic growth and urban expansion. Fifth, the average AQI efficiencies in both the high-income and upper-middle income cities were higher than the average CO2 efficiencies. However, the high-income cities had lower average CO2 emissions and AQI efficiencies than the upper-middle income cities, with the AQI efficiency differences between the two city groups expanding. As most cities were focusing more on air pollution controls than carbon dioxide emissions, greater efforts were needed in coordinating the air pollution and carbon dioxide emissions treatments. Therefore, the following suggestions are given. (1) The government should reform the hospital and medical systems. (2) Local governments need to strengthen their air pollution and disease education. (3) High-income cities need to improve their healthcare governance to reduce the incidence of respiratory diseases and the associated mortality. (4) Healthcare governance efficiency needs to be prioritized in 17 upper-middle income cities, such as Hangzhou, Changchun, Harbin, Chengdu, Guiyang, Kunming and Xi'an, by establishing sound medical management systems and emergency environmental pollution treatments, and by increasing capital asset medical investments. (5) Upper-middle income cities need to adapt their treatment controls to local conditions and design medium to long-term development strategies. (6) Upper-middle income cities need to actively learn from the technological and governance experiences in the more efficient higher-income cities." @default.
• W3083480180 created "2020-09-11" @default.
• W3083480180 creator A5019292861 @default.
• W3083480180 creator A5031883380 @default.
• W3083480180 creator A5060002817 @default.
• W3083480180 date "2020-09-07" @default.
• W3083480180 modified "2023-10-09" @default.
• W3083480180 title "Dynamic linkages among economic development, environmental pollution and human health in Chinese" @default.
• W3083480180 cites W1975676186 @default.
• W3083480180 cites W1989753523 @default.
• W3083480180 cites W2002381855 @default.
• W3083480180 cites W2032076993 @default.
• W3083480180 cites W2053654472 @default.
• W3083480180 cites W2058554563 @default.
• W3083480180 cites W2064677176 @default.
• W3083480180 cites W2066393364 @default.
• W3083480180 cites W2076452041 @default.
• W3083480180 cites W2078462299 @default.
• W3083480180 cites W2081384722 @default.
• W3083480180 cites W2089691864 @default.
• W3083480180 cites W2095262722 @default.
• W3083480180 cites W2102637397 @default.
• W3083480180 cites W2129763896 @default.
• W3083480180 cites W2130910120 @default.
• W3083480180 cites W2132870677 @default.
• W3083480180 cites W2141970008 @default.
• W3083480180 cites W2162180338 @default.
• W3083480180 cites W2163921676 @default.
• W3083480180 cites W2330645519 @default.
• W3083480180 cites W2333275403 @default.
• W3083480180 cites W2506753585 @default.
• W3083480180 cites W2513000544 @default.
• W3083480180 cites W2529734676 @default.
• W3083480180 cites W2549517843 @default.
• W3083480180 cites W2569839982 @default.
• W3083480180 cites W2581029168 @default.
• W3083480180 cites W2605219004 @default.
• W3083480180 cites W2606759204 @default.
• W3083480180 cites W2609329956 @default.
• W3083480180 cites W2729542340 @default.
• W3083480180 cites W2735511883 @default.
• W3083480180 cites W2765813151 @default.
• W3083480180 cites W2771832340 @default.
• W3083480180 cites W2799447156 @default.
• W3083480180 cites W2810124026 @default.
• W3083480180 cites W2810369319 @default.
• W3083480180 cites W2883473615 @default.
• W3083480180 cites W2884797822 @default.
• W3083480180 cites W2884859365 @default.
• W3083480180 cites W2886961745 @default.
• W3083480180 cites W2895276123 @default.
• W3083480180 cites W2895609809 @default.
• W3083480180 cites W2897403937 @default.
• W3083480180 cites W2902352244 @default.
• W3083480180 cites W2903346373 @default.
• W3083480180 cites W2904817489 @default.
• W3083480180 cites W2917010803 @default.
• W3083480180 cites W2988171610 @default.
• W3083480180 cites W4213438218 @default.
• W3083480180 cites W604380751 @default.
• W3083480180 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-020-00228-6" @default.
• W3083480180 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/7487810" @default.
• W3083480180 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32944004" @default.
• W3083480180 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3083480180 type Work @default.
• W3083480180 sameAs 3083480180 @default.
• W3083480180 citedByCount "6" @default.
• W3083480180 countsByYear W30834801802021 @default.
• W3083480180 countsByYear W30834801802022 @default.
• W3083480180 countsByYear W30834801802023 @default.
• W3083480180 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3083480180 hasAuthorship W3083480180A5019292861 @default.
• W3083480180 hasAuthorship W3083480180A5031883380 @default.
• W3083480180 hasAuthorship W3083480180A5060002817 @default.
• W3083480180 hasBestOaLocation W30834801801 @default.
• W3083480180 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W3083480180 hasConcept C119599485 @default.
• W3083480180 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W3083480180 hasConcept C134560507 @default.
• W3083480180 hasConcept C138816342 @default.
• W3083480180 hasConcept C139719470 @default.
• W3083480180 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W3083480180 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W3083480180 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W3083480180 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W3083480180 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W3083480180 hasConcept C175605778 @default.
• W3083480180 hasConcept C22088475 @default.
• W3083480180 hasConcept C2742236 @default.
• W3083480180 hasConcept C2778348673 @default.
• W3083480180 hasConcept C2780165032 @default.
• W3083480180 hasConcept C2909468537 @default.
• W3083480180 hasConcept C30772137 @default.
• W3083480180 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W3083480180 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W3083480180 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
• W3083480180 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W3083480180 hasConcept C526734887 @default.
• W3083480180 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3083480180 hasConcept C99454951 @default.

• next