FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3083627294> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3083627294 endingPage "526" @default.
• W3083627294 startingPage "514" @default.
• W3083627294 abstract "Tracheostomy is among the common procedures performed in the intensive care unit (ICU), with percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) being the preferred technique. We sought to understand the current practice of tracheostomy in Indian ICUs.A pan-India multicenter prospective observational study, endorsed and peer-reviewed by the Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine (ISCCM), on various aspects of tracheostomy performed in critically ill patients was conducted between September 1, 2019 and December 31, 2019. The SPSS software was used for the statistical analysis. Cross tables were generated and the chi-square test was used for testing of association. The p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.Out of 67 ICUs that participated, 88.1% were from private sector hospitals. A total of 923 tracheostomies were performed during the study period; out of which, 666 were PDT and 257 were surgical tracheostomy (ST). Coagulopathic patients received more platelet transfusion [p = 0.037 with platelet count (PC) < 50 × 109, p = 0.021 with PC 50-100 × 109] and fresh frozen plasma transfusion in the ST group (p = 0.0001). The performance of PDT vs ST by day 7 of admission was 28.4% vs 21% (p = 0.023). The single dilator technique (60.4%) was the preferred technique for PDT followed by the Grigg's forceps and then the multiple dilator technique. Fiberoptic bronchoscope (FOB) and ultrasonography (USG) were used in 29.3% and 16.8%, respectively, for guidance during tracheostomy. Most of the PDTs were performed by a trained intensivist (74.2%), whereas ST was mostly done by an ENT surgeon (56.8%). Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy resulted in less hemorrhagic (2.6% vs 7%, p = 0.002) and desaturation complications (2.3% vs 6.6%, p = 0.001) as compared to ST. The duration of procedure was shorter in the PDT group (average shortening by 9.2 minutes) and the ventilator-free days (VFD) were higher in the PDT group. The cost was less in PDT by approximately Rs. 13,104.Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy, especially the single dilator technique, is preferred by clinicians in Indian ICUs. The incidence of minor complications like hemorrhagic episodes is lower with PDT. Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy was found to be cheaper on cost per patient basis as compared to ST (with or without complications).Gupta S, Tomar DS, Dixit S, Zirpe K, Choudhry D, Govil D, et al. Dilatational Percutaneous vs Surgical TracheoStomy in IntEnsive Care UniT: A Practice Pattern Observational Multicenter Study (DISSECT). Indian J Crit Care Med 2020;24(7):514-526." @default.
• W3083627294 created "2020-09-11" @default.
• W3083627294 creator A5001025608 @default.
• W3083627294 creator A5007023743 @default.
• W3083627294 creator A5014357415 @default.
• W3083627294 creator A5023727967 @default.
• W3083627294 creator A5032161163 @default.
• W3083627294 creator A5040629209 @default.
• W3083627294 creator A5061602567 @default.
• W3083627294 creator A5069437145 @default.
• W3083627294 creator A5070668257 @default.
• W3083627294 creator A5078576446 @default.
• W3083627294 creator A5080448224 @default.
• W3083627294 date "2020-09-05" @default.
• W3083627294 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W3083627294 title "Dilatational Percutaneous vs Surgical TracheoStomy in IntEnsive Care UniT: A Practice Pattern Observational Multicenter Study (DISSECT)" @default.
• W3083627294 cites W1486341133 @default.
• W3083627294 cites W1653113022 @default.
• W3083627294 cites W1978697035 @default.
• W3083627294 cites W1978799565 @default.
• W3083627294 cites W1988963581 @default.
• W3083627294 cites W1990473808 @default.
• W3083627294 cites W1998585165 @default.
• W3083627294 cites W2008587371 @default.
• W3083627294 cites W2019315702 @default.
• W3083627294 cites W2024506260 @default.
• W3083627294 cites W2025413258 @default.
• W3083627294 cites W2036426124 @default.
• W3083627294 cites W2038101278 @default.
• W3083627294 cites W2049470284 @default.
• W3083627294 cites W2069336666 @default.
• W3083627294 cites W2074203391 @default.
• W3083627294 cites W2088541299 @default.
• W3083627294 cites W2090891433 @default.
• W3083627294 cites W2092145064 @default.
• W3083627294 cites W2092799589 @default.
• W3083627294 cites W2097764206 @default.
• W3083627294 cites W2106079087 @default.
• W3083627294 cites W2132550011 @default.
• W3083627294 cites W2134409237 @default.
• W3083627294 cites W2151965475 @default.
• W3083627294 cites W2165645051 @default.
• W3083627294 cites W2270173431 @default.
• W3083627294 cites W2315613264 @default.
• W3083627294 cites W2315875464 @default.
• W3083627294 cites W2317366108 @default.
• W3083627294 cites W2338596367 @default.
• W3083627294 cites W2408861766 @default.
• W3083627294 cites W2576851434 @default.
• W3083627294 cites W2725000678 @default.
• W3083627294 cites W2793881640 @default.
• W3083627294 doi "https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23441" @default.
• W3083627294 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/7482354" @default.
• W3083627294 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32963433" @default.
• W3083627294 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3083627294 type Work @default.
• W3083627294 sameAs 3083627294 @default.
• W3083627294 citedByCount "6" @default.
• W3083627294 countsByYear W30836272942020 @default.
• W3083627294 countsByYear W30836272942021 @default.
• W3083627294 countsByYear W30836272942022 @default.
• W3083627294 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3083627294 hasAuthorship W3083627294A5001025608 @default.
• W3083627294 hasAuthorship W3083627294A5007023743 @default.
• W3083627294 hasAuthorship W3083627294A5014357415 @default.
• W3083627294 hasAuthorship W3083627294A5023727967 @default.
• W3083627294 hasAuthorship W3083627294A5032161163 @default.
• W3083627294 hasAuthorship W3083627294A5040629209 @default.
• W3083627294 hasAuthorship W3083627294A5061602567 @default.
• W3083627294 hasAuthorship W3083627294A5069437145 @default.
• W3083627294 hasAuthorship W3083627294A5070668257 @default.
• W3083627294 hasAuthorship W3083627294A5078576446 @default.
• W3083627294 hasAuthorship W3083627294A5080448224 @default.
• W3083627294 hasBestOaLocation W30836272941 @default.
• W3083627294 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3083627294 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3083627294 hasConcept C177713679 @default.
• W3083627294 hasConcept C194828623 @default.
• W3083627294 hasConcept C23131810 @default.
• W3083627294 hasConcept C2776376669 @default.
• W3083627294 hasConcept C2777032099 @default.
• W3083627294 hasConcept C2777925291 @default.
• W3083627294 hasConcept C2780813298 @default.
• W3083627294 hasConcept C2987404301 @default.
• W3083627294 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3083627294 hasConceptScore W3083627294C126322002 @default.
• W3083627294 hasConceptScore W3083627294C141071460 @default.
• W3083627294 hasConceptScore W3083627294C177713679 @default.
• W3083627294 hasConceptScore W3083627294C194828623 @default.
• W3083627294 hasConceptScore W3083627294C23131810 @default.
• W3083627294 hasConceptScore W3083627294C2776376669 @default.
• W3083627294 hasConceptScore W3083627294C2777032099 @default.
• W3083627294 hasConceptScore W3083627294C2777925291 @default.
• W3083627294 hasConceptScore W3083627294C2780813298 @default.
• W3083627294 hasConceptScore W3083627294C2987404301 @default.
• W3083627294 hasConceptScore W3083627294C71924100 @default.
• W3083627294 hasIssue "7" @default.
• W3083627294 hasLocation W30836272941 @default.

• next