Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3084236113> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W3084236113 endingPage "235019" @default.
- W3084236113 startingPage "235019" @default.
- W3084236113 abstract "Segmentation of lymphoma lesions in FDG PET/CT images is critical in both assessing individual lesions and quantifying patient disease burden. Simple thresholding methods remain common despite the large heterogeneity in lymphoma lesion location, size, and contrast. Here, we assess 11 automated PET segmentation methods for their use in two scenarios: individual lesion segmentation and patient-level disease quantification in lymphoma. Lesions on 18F-FDG PET/CT scans of 90 lymphoma patients were contoured by a nuclear medicine physician. Thresholding, active contours, clustering, adaptive region-growing, and convolutional neural network (CNN) methods were implemented on all physician-identified lesions. Lesion-level segmentation was evaluated using multiple segmentation performance metrics (Dice, Hausdorff Distance). Patient-level quantification of total disease burden (SUVtotal) and metabolic tumor volume (MTV) was assessed using Spearman's correlation coefficients between the segmentation output and physician contours. Lesion segmentation and patient quantification performance was compared to inter-physician agreement in a subset of 20 patients segmented by a second nuclear medicine physician. In total, 1223 lesions with median tumor-to-background ratio of 4.0 and volume of 1.8 cm3, were evaluated. When assessed for lesion segmentation, a 3D CNN, DeepMedic, achieved the highest performance across all evaluation metrics. DeepMedic, clustering methods, and an iterative threshold method had lesion-level segmentation performance comparable to the degree of inter-physician agreement. For patient-level SUVtotal and MTV quantification, all methods except 40% and 50% SUVmax and adaptive region-growing achieved a performance that was similar the agreement of the two physicians. Multiple methods, including a 3D CNN, clustering, and an iterative threshold method, achieved both good lesion-level segmentation and patient-level quantification performance in a population of 90 lymphoma patients. These methods are thus recommended over thresholding methods such as 40% and 50% SUVmax, which were consistently found to be significantly outside the limits defined by inter-physician agreement." @default.
- W3084236113 created "2020-09-14" @default.
- W3084236113 creator A5005048710 @default.
- W3084236113 creator A5014972158 @default.
- W3084236113 creator A5024039557 @default.
- W3084236113 creator A5030203098 @default.
- W3084236113 creator A5030681199 @default.
- W3084236113 creator A5040530370 @default.
- W3084236113 creator A5067329171 @default.
- W3084236113 date "2020-11-25" @default.
- W3084236113 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
- W3084236113 title "Comparison of 11 automated PET segmentation methods in lymphoma" @default.
- W3084236113 cites W1507619039 @default.
- W3084236113 cites W1901129140 @default.
- W3084236113 cites W1967385973 @default.
- W3084236113 cites W1982980578 @default.
- W3084236113 cites W1998259955 @default.
- W3084236113 cites W2019929699 @default.
- W3084236113 cites W2052173606 @default.
- W3084236113 cites W2075627595 @default.
- W3084236113 cites W2116040950 @default.
- W3084236113 cites W2119147717 @default.
- W3084236113 cites W2153440334 @default.
- W3084236113 cites W2301358467 @default.
- W3084236113 cites W2409456704 @default.
- W3084236113 cites W2464708700 @default.
- W3084236113 cites W2503562113 @default.
- W3084236113 cites W2556592657 @default.
- W3084236113 cites W2582769321 @default.
- W3084236113 cites W2626467069 @default.
- W3084236113 cites W2725801426 @default.
- W3084236113 cites W2773727367 @default.
- W3084236113 cites W2782993895 @default.
- W3084236113 cites W2797624406 @default.
- W3084236113 cites W2892266666 @default.
- W3084236113 cites W2927995861 @default.
- W3084236113 cites W2943954215 @default.
- W3084236113 cites W2949084717 @default.
- W3084236113 cites W2962914239 @default.
- W3084236113 cites W3082577495 @default.
- W3084236113 cites W317170363 @default.
- W3084236113 cites W4312990027 @default.
- W3084236113 doi "https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/abb6bd" @default.
- W3084236113 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32906088" @default.
- W3084236113 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
- W3084236113 type Work @default.
- W3084236113 sameAs 3084236113 @default.
- W3084236113 citedByCount "15" @default.
- W3084236113 countsByYear W30842361132021 @default.
- W3084236113 countsByYear W30842361132022 @default.
- W3084236113 countsByYear W30842361132023 @default.
- W3084236113 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3084236113 hasAuthorship W3084236113A5005048710 @default.
- W3084236113 hasAuthorship W3084236113A5014972158 @default.
- W3084236113 hasAuthorship W3084236113A5024039557 @default.
- W3084236113 hasAuthorship W3084236113A5030203098 @default.
- W3084236113 hasAuthorship W3084236113A5030681199 @default.
- W3084236113 hasAuthorship W3084236113A5040530370 @default.
- W3084236113 hasAuthorship W3084236113A5067329171 @default.
- W3084236113 hasConcept C115961682 @default.
- W3084236113 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
- W3084236113 hasConcept C141898687 @default.
- W3084236113 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
- W3084236113 hasConcept C153180895 @default.
- W3084236113 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
- W3084236113 hasConcept C191178318 @default.
- W3084236113 hasConcept C2781156865 @default.
- W3084236113 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
- W3084236113 hasConcept C31601959 @default.
- W3084236113 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W3084236113 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W3084236113 hasConcept C81363708 @default.
- W3084236113 hasConcept C89600930 @default.
- W3084236113 hasConceptScore W3084236113C115961682 @default.
- W3084236113 hasConceptScore W3084236113C126838900 @default.
- W3084236113 hasConceptScore W3084236113C141898687 @default.
- W3084236113 hasConceptScore W3084236113C142724271 @default.
- W3084236113 hasConceptScore W3084236113C153180895 @default.
- W3084236113 hasConceptScore W3084236113C154945302 @default.
- W3084236113 hasConceptScore W3084236113C191178318 @default.
- W3084236113 hasConceptScore W3084236113C2781156865 @default.
- W3084236113 hasConceptScore W3084236113C2989005 @default.
- W3084236113 hasConceptScore W3084236113C31601959 @default.
- W3084236113 hasConceptScore W3084236113C41008148 @default.
- W3084236113 hasConceptScore W3084236113C71924100 @default.
- W3084236113 hasConceptScore W3084236113C81363708 @default.
- W3084236113 hasConceptScore W3084236113C89600930 @default.
- W3084236113 hasFunder F4320332457 @default.
- W3084236113 hasIssue "23" @default.
- W3084236113 hasLocation W30842361131 @default.
- W3084236113 hasLocation W30842361132 @default.
- W3084236113 hasOpenAccess W3084236113 @default.
- W3084236113 hasPrimaryLocation W30842361131 @default.
- W3084236113 hasRelatedWork W2058443653 @default.
- W3084236113 hasRelatedWork W2181351615 @default.
- W3084236113 hasRelatedWork W2347731544 @default.
- W3084236113 hasRelatedWork W2411367154 @default.
- W3084236113 hasRelatedWork W2551390060 @default.