FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3086172679> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3086172679 endingPage "393" @default.
• W3086172679 startingPage "384" @default.
• W3086172679 abstract "Abstract Purpose To prospectively compare the clinical performance of posterior inlay‐retained and wing‐retained monolithic zirconia fixed partial dentures (FPDs). Materials and methods After simple randomization, 30 participants received either one inlay‐retained (n = 15; mean age: 56.38 ± 12.70 years; 10 men [66.7%]) or one wing‐retained (n = 15; mean age: 45.90 ±13.24 years; 7 men [46.7%]) FPD. The restorations, which predominantly replaced first molars, were fabricated from translucent, 3 mol% yttria‐stabilized zirconia and attached with self‐etching resin cement. Restorations and abutment teeth were clinically followed up for complications one week and 3, 6, and 12 months after cementation. Plaque and gingival scores, probing pocket depths, and attachment levels were recorded for the abutment and contralateral reference teeth both before treatment and during follow‐up examinations. The restorations were also assessed in accordance with FDI World Dental Federation criteria. Statistical analyses were conducted with R (α = 0.05). An adaptive, 2‐stage study design based on the incidence of failure‐free survival in the groups after 12 months (stage 1) was implemented. Predefined decision rules were used to determine whether further recruitment (stage 2) would enable the detection of a statistically significant difference between the restoration designs with sufficient power. Results During 12 months, only one wing retainer debonded which required removal of the FPD. Failure‐free survival was thus 93.3% for wing‐retained and 100% for inlay‐retained FPDs (log‐rank test, p = 0.317). Moderate aftercare resulted in intervention‐free rates of 78.8% and 86.7% for inlay‐retained and wing‐retained restorations, respectively (log‐rank test, p = 0.605). Based on FDI World Dental Federation criteria, all restorations were acceptable at the 12‐month follow‐up (Fisher‐Boschloo test, p = 0.161). Plaque, gingival, and periodontal scores remained practically unchanged from before treatment to the 12‐month follow‐up. Recruitment was stopped after stage 1 because, based on the small difference in the incidence of failure‐free survival in the groups, it was accepted that it would not be possible to recruit the necessary number of participants to show a statistically significant difference between the retainer designs. Conclusions Both inlay‐retained and wing‐retained monolithic zirconia resin‐bonded FPDs performed well for the 12‐month, short‐term follow‐up period." @default.
• W3086172679 created "2020-09-21" @default.
• W3086172679 creator A5001261463 @default.
• W3086172679 creator A5008612902 @default.
• W3086172679 creator A5013968675 @default.
• W3086172679 creator A5016234313 @default.
• W3086172679 creator A5028192634 @default.
• W3086172679 creator A5079659752 @default.
• W3086172679 creator A5087826705 @default.
• W3086172679 creator A5090324620 @default.
• W3086172679 date "2020-10-04" @default.
• W3086172679 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W3086172679 title "Clinical Performance of Posterior Inlay‐Retained and Wing‐Retained Monolithic Zirconia Resin‐Bonded Fixed Partial Dentures: Stage One Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial" @default.
• W3086172679 cites W1497112755 @default.
• W3086172679 cites W1607816196 @default.
• W3086172679 cites W1938984244 @default.
• W3086172679 cites W1986313232 @default.
• W3086172679 cites W1992844800 @default.
• W3086172679 cites W1994508515 @default.
• W3086172679 cites W2013990072 @default.
• W3086172679 cites W2021792184 @default.
• W3086172679 cites W2026501916 @default.
• W3086172679 cites W2027694161 @default.
• W3086172679 cites W2031095603 @default.
• W3086172679 cites W2031665559 @default.
• W3086172679 cites W2042938317 @default.
• W3086172679 cites W2059513879 @default.
• W3086172679 cites W2064866310 @default.
• W3086172679 cites W2107228383 @default.
• W3086172679 cites W2107755551 @default.
• W3086172679 cites W2118873856 @default.
• W3086172679 cites W2123283968 @default.
• W3086172679 cites W2151509563 @default.
• W3086172679 cites W2171031568 @default.
• W3086172679 cites W2193517023 @default.
• W3086172679 cites W2331139255 @default.
• W3086172679 cites W2345445401 @default.
• W3086172679 cites W2404479775 @default.
• W3086172679 cites W2485329300 @default.
• W3086172679 cites W2508178075 @default.
• W3086172679 cites W2529764078 @default.
• W3086172679 cites W2545127284 @default.
• W3086172679 cites W2588542719 @default.
• W3086172679 cites W2598286850 @default.
• W3086172679 cites W2615178692 @default.
• W3086172679 cites W2621661889 @default.
• W3086172679 cites W2656736668 @default.
• W3086172679 cites W2733470903 @default.
• W3086172679 cites W2737776271 @default.
• W3086172679 cites W2758129254 @default.
• W3086172679 cites W2896989819 @default.
• W3086172679 cites W2897424535 @default.
• W3086172679 cites W2902110140 @default.
• W3086172679 cites W2914516576 @default.
• W3086172679 cites W2921998294 @default.
• W3086172679 cites W2940002291 @default.
• W3086172679 cites W2964902718 @default.
• W3086172679 cites W3004073541 @default.
• W3086172679 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13258" @default.
• W3086172679 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32924240" @default.
• W3086172679 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3086172679 type Work @default.
• W3086172679 sameAs 3086172679 @default.
• W3086172679 citedByCount "16" @default.
• W3086172679 countsByYear W30861726792020 @default.
• W3086172679 countsByYear W30861726792021 @default.
• W3086172679 countsByYear W30861726792022 @default.
• W3086172679 countsByYear W30861726792023 @default.
• W3086172679 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3086172679 hasAuthorship W3086172679A5001261463 @default.
• W3086172679 hasAuthorship W3086172679A5008612902 @default.
• W3086172679 hasAuthorship W3086172679A5013968675 @default.
• W3086172679 hasAuthorship W3086172679A5016234313 @default.
• W3086172679 hasAuthorship W3086172679A5028192634 @default.
• W3086172679 hasAuthorship W3086172679A5079659752 @default.
• W3086172679 hasAuthorship W3086172679A5087826705 @default.
• W3086172679 hasAuthorship W3086172679A5090324620 @default.
• W3086172679 hasBestOaLocation W30861726791 @default.
• W3086172679 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W3086172679 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3086172679 hasConcept C147176958 @default.
• W3086172679 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W3086172679 hasConcept C190719290 @default.
• W3086172679 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W3086172679 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W3086172679 hasConcept C202271784 @default.
• W3086172679 hasConcept C2781411149 @default.
• W3086172679 hasConcept C2908906697 @default.
• W3086172679 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W3086172679 hasConcept C48777230 @default.
• W3086172679 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3086172679 hasConceptScore W3086172679C127413603 @default.
• W3086172679 hasConceptScore W3086172679C141071460 @default.
• W3086172679 hasConceptScore W3086172679C147176958 @default.
• W3086172679 hasConceptScore W3086172679C168563851 @default.
• W3086172679 hasConceptScore W3086172679C190719290 @default.
• W3086172679 hasConceptScore W3086172679C192562407 @default.
• W3086172679 hasConceptScore W3086172679C199343813 @default.

• next