FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3086362783> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3086362783 endingPage "71" @default.
• W3086362783 startingPage "61" @default.
• W3086362783 abstract "Aim Skill decay is a recognised problem in resuscitation training. Spaced learning has been proposed as an intervention to optimise resuscitation skill performance compared to traditional massed learning. A systematic review was performed to answer ‘In learners taking resuscitation courses, does spaced learning compared to massed learning improve educational outcomes and clinical outcomes?’ Methods This systematic review followed the PRISMA guidelines. We searched bibliographic databases (Embase, MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library (CENTRAL)) from inception to 2 December 2019. Randomised controlled trials and non-randomised studies were eligible for inclusion. Two reviewers independently scrutinized studies for relevance, extracted data and assessed quality of studies. Risk of bias of studies and quality of evidence were assessed using RoB, ROBINS-I tool and GRADEpro respectively. Educational outcomes studied were skill retention and performance 1 year after completion of training; skill performance between completion of training and 1 year; and knowledge at course conclusion. Clinical outcomes were skill performance at actual resuscitation, patient survival to discharge with favourable neurological outcome. This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42019150358). Results From 2,042 references, we included data from 17 studies (13 randomised studies, 4 cohort studies) in courses with manikins and simulation in the narrative synthesis. Eight studies reported results from basic life support training (with or without automatic external defibrillator); three studies reported from paediatric life support training; five were in neonatal resuscitation and one study reported results from a bespoke emergency medicine course which included resuscitation teaching. Fifteen out of seventeen studies reported improved performance with the use of spaced learning. The overall certainty of evidence was rated as very low for all outcomes primarily due to a very serious risk of bias. Heterogeneity across studies precluded any meta-analyses. There was a lack of data on the effectiveness of spaced learning on skill acquisition compared to maintaining skill performance and/or preventing skill decay. There was also insufficient data to examine the effectiveness of spaced learning on laypeople compared to healthcare providers. Conclusions Despite the very low certainty of evidence this systematic review suggests that spaced learning can improve skill performance at 1 year post course conclusion and skill performance between course conclusion and 1 year. There is a lack of data from this educational intervention on skill performance in clinical resuscitation and patient survival at discharge with favourable neurological outcomes." @default.
• W3086362783 created "2020-09-21" @default.
• W3086362783 creator A5004834977 @default.
• W3086362783 creator A5010409421 @default.
• W3086362783 creator A5012751492 @default.
• W3086362783 creator A5052886806 @default.
• W3086362783 creator A5054223377 @default.
• W3086362783 creator A5060777701 @default.
• W3086362783 creator A5067287880 @default.
• W3086362783 creator A5067522840 @default.
• W3086362783 creator A5073811795 @default.
• W3086362783 creator A5078896230 @default.
• W3086362783 creator A5079187530 @default.
• W3086362783 date "2020-11-01" @default.
• W3086362783 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W3086362783 title "Spaced learning versus massed learning in resuscitation — A systematic review" @default.
• W3086362783 cites W1573845165 @default.
• W3086362783 cites W1971300355 @default.
• W3086362783 cites W1972551103 @default.
• W3086362783 cites W1979122329 @default.
• W3086362783 cites W1993635181 @default.
• W3086362783 cites W1997031978 @default.
• W3086362783 cites W1998698062 @default.
• W3086362783 cites W2023147042 @default.
• W3086362783 cites W2046709830 @default.
• W3086362783 cites W2049428464 @default.
• W3086362783 cites W2052686905 @default.
• W3086362783 cites W2069393582 @default.
• W3086362783 cites W2070533567 @default.
• W3086362783 cites W2089615638 @default.
• W3086362783 cites W2101975820 @default.
• W3086362783 cites W2119640468 @default.
• W3086362783 cites W2134236426 @default.
• W3086362783 cites W2143360537 @default.
• W3086362783 cites W2156098321 @default.
• W3086362783 cites W2165010366 @default.
• W3086362783 cites W2169419728 @default.
• W3086362783 cites W2172051681 @default.
• W3086362783 cites W2319622829 @default.
• W3086362783 cites W2526163671 @default.
• W3086362783 cites W2531269403 @default.
• W3086362783 cites W2587426125 @default.
• W3086362783 cites W2621115629 @default.
• W3086362783 cites W2794515627 @default.
• W3086362783 cites W2809022703 @default.
• W3086362783 cites W2809759199 @default.
• W3086362783 cites W2899044761 @default.
• W3086362783 cites W2924475457 @default.
• W3086362783 cites W2952707125 @default.
• W3086362783 cites W2970684805 @default.
• W3086362783 cites W2991792334 @default.
• W3086362783 cites W4210980041 @default.
• W3086362783 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.08.132" @default.
• W3086362783 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32926969" @default.
• W3086362783 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3086362783 type Work @default.
• W3086362783 sameAs 3086362783 @default.
• W3086362783 citedByCount "26" @default.
• W3086362783 countsByYear W30863627832021 @default.
• W3086362783 countsByYear W30863627832022 @default.
• W3086362783 countsByYear W30863627832023 @default.
• W3086362783 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3086362783 hasAuthorship W3086362783A5004834977 @default.
• W3086362783 hasAuthorship W3086362783A5010409421 @default.
• W3086362783 hasAuthorship W3086362783A5012751492 @default.
• W3086362783 hasAuthorship W3086362783A5052886806 @default.
• W3086362783 hasAuthorship W3086362783A5054223377 @default.
• W3086362783 hasAuthorship W3086362783A5060777701 @default.
• W3086362783 hasAuthorship W3086362783A5067287880 @default.
• W3086362783 hasAuthorship W3086362783A5067522840 @default.
• W3086362783 hasAuthorship W3086362783A5073811795 @default.
• W3086362783 hasAuthorship W3086362783A5078896230 @default.
• W3086362783 hasAuthorship W3086362783A5079187530 @default.
• W3086362783 hasBestOaLocation W30863627832 @default.
• W3086362783 hasConcept C109359841 @default.
• W3086362783 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3086362783 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W3086362783 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W3086362783 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3086362783 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W3086362783 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
• W3086362783 hasConcept C194828623 @default.
• W3086362783 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3086362783 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
• W3086362783 hasConcept C2777055891 @default.
• W3086362783 hasConcept C2778165595 @default.
• W3086362783 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W3086362783 hasConcept C44210515 @default.
• W3086362783 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3086362783 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W3086362783 hasConceptScore W3086362783C109359841 @default.
• W3086362783 hasConceptScore W3086362783C126322002 @default.
• W3086362783 hasConceptScore W3086362783C15744967 @default.
• W3086362783 hasConceptScore W3086362783C168563851 @default.
• W3086362783 hasConceptScore W3086362783C17744445 @default.
• W3086362783 hasConceptScore W3086362783C1862650 @default.
• W3086362783 hasConceptScore W3086362783C189708586 @default.
• W3086362783 hasConceptScore W3086362783C194828623 @default.

• next