Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3087482044> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W3087482044 endingPage "410" @default.
- W3087482044 startingPage "402" @default.
- W3087482044 abstract "Purpose To critically review the literature reporting biomechanical outcomes of superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) for the treatment of massive and/or irreparable rotator cuff tears. Methods A systematic review was performed following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines using the PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library databases in August 2020. Cadaveric studies were assessed for glenohumeral translation, subacromial contact pressure, and superior humeral translation comparing SCR with an intact cuff with reference to a torn control state. Results A total of 15 studies (142 shoulders) were included in our data analysis. SCR showed improvements in superior humeral translation, subacromial contact force, and glenohumeral contact force when biomechanically compared with the massive and/or irreparably torn rotator cuff. No statistically significant differences were found between SCR and the intact rotator cuff regarding superior humeral translation (standard mean difference [SMD], 2.09 mm vs 2.50 mm; P = .54) or subacromial contact force (SMD, 2.85 mPa vs 2.83 mPa; P = .99). Significant differences were observed between SCR and the intact cuff for glenohumeral contact force only, in favor of the intact cuff (SMD, 1.73 N vs 5.45 N; P = .03). Conclusions SCR may largely restore static restraints to superior humeral translation in irreparable rotator cuff tears, although active glenohumeral compression is diminished relative to the intact rotator cuff. Clinical Relevance Investigating the biomechanical outcomes of SCR will help surgeons better understand the effectiveness of this treatment option. To critically review the literature reporting biomechanical outcomes of superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) for the treatment of massive and/or irreparable rotator cuff tears. A systematic review was performed following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines using the PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library databases in August 2020. Cadaveric studies were assessed for glenohumeral translation, subacromial contact pressure, and superior humeral translation comparing SCR with an intact cuff with reference to a torn control state. A total of 15 studies (142 shoulders) were included in our data analysis. SCR showed improvements in superior humeral translation, subacromial contact force, and glenohumeral contact force when biomechanically compared with the massive and/or irreparably torn rotator cuff. No statistically significant differences were found between SCR and the intact rotator cuff regarding superior humeral translation (standard mean difference [SMD], 2.09 mm vs 2.50 mm; P = .54) or subacromial contact force (SMD, 2.85 mPa vs 2.83 mPa; P = .99). Significant differences were observed between SCR and the intact cuff for glenohumeral contact force only, in favor of the intact cuff (SMD, 1.73 N vs 5.45 N; P = .03). SCR may largely restore static restraints to superior humeral translation in irreparable rotator cuff tears, although active glenohumeral compression is diminished relative to the intact rotator cuff." @default.
- W3087482044 created "2020-09-25" @default.
- W3087482044 creator A5049627554 @default.
- W3087482044 creator A5050481329 @default.
- W3087482044 creator A5069629709 @default.
- W3087482044 creator A5071101746 @default.
- W3087482044 creator A5082701563 @default.
- W3087482044 date "2021-01-01" @default.
- W3087482044 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W3087482044 title "Superior Capsular Reconstruction Provides Sufficient Biomechanical Outcomes for Massive, Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears: A Systematic Review" @default.
- W3087482044 cites W1863138831 @default.
- W3087482044 cites W1965263359 @default.
- W3087482044 cites W1977763663 @default.
- W3087482044 cites W1988578910 @default.
- W3087482044 cites W2024896644 @default.
- W3087482044 cites W2051711773 @default.
- W3087482044 cites W2069161338 @default.
- W3087482044 cites W2085434016 @default.
- W3087482044 cites W2086284993 @default.
- W3087482044 cites W2093643496 @default.
- W3087482044 cites W2093737403 @default.
- W3087482044 cites W2094629302 @default.
- W3087482044 cites W2114386408 @default.
- W3087482044 cites W2117358681 @default.
- W3087482044 cites W2122736223 @default.
- W3087482044 cites W2125435699 @default.
- W3087482044 cites W2130656569 @default.
- W3087482044 cites W2137147154 @default.
- W3087482044 cites W2142424191 @default.
- W3087482044 cites W2154541870 @default.
- W3087482044 cites W2161701454 @default.
- W3087482044 cites W2175030864 @default.
- W3087482044 cites W2196473973 @default.
- W3087482044 cites W2300765500 @default.
- W3087482044 cites W2326504560 @default.
- W3087482044 cites W2344047532 @default.
- W3087482044 cites W2557709266 @default.
- W3087482044 cites W2566307962 @default.
- W3087482044 cites W2567360190 @default.
- W3087482044 cites W2586738153 @default.
- W3087482044 cites W2595029458 @default.
- W3087482044 cites W2620725061 @default.
- W3087482044 cites W2621007631 @default.
- W3087482044 cites W2768828462 @default.
- W3087482044 cites W2780660265 @default.
- W3087482044 cites W2782037993 @default.
- W3087482044 cites W2794941451 @default.
- W3087482044 cites W2800745463 @default.
- W3087482044 cites W2884668156 @default.
- W3087482044 cites W2902711627 @default.
- W3087482044 cites W2903655379 @default.
- W3087482044 cites W2915786661 @default.
- W3087482044 cites W2921623437 @default.
- W3087482044 cites W2921639215 @default.
- W3087482044 cites W2922683676 @default.
- W3087482044 cites W2949103815 @default.
- W3087482044 cites W2951549672 @default.
- W3087482044 cites W2973039412 @default.
- W3087482044 cites W2990983099 @default.
- W3087482044 cites W2991289438 @default.
- W3087482044 cites W3032142041 @default.
- W3087482044 cites W3034625874 @default.
- W3087482044 cites W3034727081 @default.
- W3087482044 cites W4294305346 @default.
- W3087482044 cites W78649709 @default.
- W3087482044 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2020.09.007" @default.
- W3087482044 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32950647" @default.
- W3087482044 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
- W3087482044 type Work @default.
- W3087482044 sameAs 3087482044 @default.
- W3087482044 citedByCount "19" @default.
- W3087482044 countsByYear W30874820442021 @default.
- W3087482044 countsByYear W30874820442022 @default.
- W3087482044 countsByYear W30874820442023 @default.
- W3087482044 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3087482044 hasAuthorship W3087482044A5049627554 @default.
- W3087482044 hasAuthorship W3087482044A5050481329 @default.
- W3087482044 hasAuthorship W3087482044A5069629709 @default.
- W3087482044 hasAuthorship W3087482044A5071101746 @default.
- W3087482044 hasAuthorship W3087482044A5082701563 @default.
- W3087482044 hasConcept C105702510 @default.
- W3087482044 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W3087482044 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
- W3087482044 hasConcept C170700871 @default.
- W3087482044 hasConcept C175696284 @default.
- W3087482044 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W3087482044 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
- W3087482044 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W3087482044 hasConcept C2776030733 @default.
- W3087482044 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
- W3087482044 hasConcept C2776511800 @default.
- W3087482044 hasConcept C2776984999 @default.
- W3087482044 hasConcept C2777325788 @default.
- W3087482044 hasConcept C2778275304 @default.
- W3087482044 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
- W3087482044 hasConcept C2780017030 @default.
- W3087482044 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W3087482044 hasConceptScore W3087482044C105702510 @default.