FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3088251147> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3088251147 endingPage "53" @default.
• W3088251147 startingPage "45" @default.
• W3088251147 abstract "To compare the clinical efficacy, complications, and reoperation rates among three major treatments for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS): decompression, fusion, and interspinous process device (IPD), using a Bayesian network meta-analysis.Databases including Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science were used for the literature search. Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) with three treatment methods were reviewed and included in the study. R software (version 3.6.0), Stata (version 14.0), and Review Manager (version 5.3) were used to perform data analysis.A total of 10 RCTs involving 1254 patients were enrolled in the present study and each study met an acceptable quality according to our quality assessment described later. In direct comparison, IPD exhibited a higher incidence of reoperation than fusion (OR ​= ​2.93, CI: 1.07-8.02). In indirect comparison, the rank of VAS leg (from best to worst) was as follows: IPD (64%) ​> ​decompression (25%) ​> ​fusion (11%), and the rank of ODI (from best to worst) was: IPD (84%) ​> ​fusion (13%) ​> ​decompression (4%). IPD had the lowest incidence of complications; the rank of complications (from best to worst) was: IPD (60%) ​> ​decompression (27%) ​> ​fusion (14%). However, for the rank of reoperation, fusion showed the best results (from best to worst): fusion (79%) ​> ​decompression (20%) ​> ​IPD (1%). Consistency tests at global and local level showed satisfactory results and heterogeneity tests using loop text indicated a favorable stability.The present study preliminarily indicates that non-fusion methods including decompression and IPD are optimal choices for treating LSS, which achieves favorable clinical outcomes. IPD exhibits a low incidence of complications, but its high rate of reoperation should be treated with caution.For the treatment of LSS, several procedures including decompression, fusion, and IPD have been reported. However, each method has its own advantages and disadvantages. To date, the golden standard treatment for LSS is still controversial. In this network meta-analysis, our results demonstrate that both decompression and IPD obtain satisfactory clinical effects for LSS. IPD is accompanied with a low incidence of complications, however, its high rate of reoperation should be acknowledged with discretion." @default.
• W3088251147 created "2020-10-01" @default.
• W3088251147 creator A5026030503 @default.
• W3088251147 creator A5033060653 @default.
• W3088251147 creator A5037858093 @default.
• W3088251147 creator A5047054215 @default.
• W3088251147 creator A5051186597 @default.
• W3088251147 creator A5073362698 @default.
• W3088251147 creator A5076339795 @default.
• W3088251147 date "2021-01-01" @default.
• W3088251147 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W3088251147 title "Which is the most effective treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis: Decompression, fusion, or interspinous process device? A Bayesian network meta-analysis" @default.
• W3088251147 cites W1987205168 @default.
• W3088251147 cites W1992390024 @default.
• W3088251147 cites W1997224926 @default.
• W3088251147 cites W2011619218 @default.
• W3088251147 cites W2015166714 @default.
• W3088251147 cites W2016599349 @default.
• W3088251147 cites W2026385509 @default.
• W3088251147 cites W2057107599 @default.
• W3088251147 cites W2057656367 @default.
• W3088251147 cites W2092688813 @default.
• W3088251147 cites W2092940694 @default.
• W3088251147 cites W2095685965 @default.
• W3088251147 cites W2100028122 @default.
• W3088251147 cites W2141734363 @default.
• W3088251147 cites W2142141690 @default.
• W3088251147 cites W2145245309 @default.
• W3088251147 cites W2155003970 @default.
• W3088251147 cites W2156098321 @default.
• W3088251147 cites W2156765390 @default.
• W3088251147 cites W2163641864 @default.
• W3088251147 cites W2259673558 @default.
• W3088251147 cites W2318471087 @default.
• W3088251147 cites W2336901087 @default.
• W3088251147 cites W2339565424 @default.
• W3088251147 cites W2418917375 @default.
• W3088251147 cites W246286872 @default.
• W3088251147 cites W2668211897 @default.
• W3088251147 cites W2729848442 @default.
• W3088251147 cites W2756784389 @default.
• W3088251147 cites W2866247551 @default.
• W3088251147 cites W2936488702 @default.
• W3088251147 cites W2951141584 @default.
• W3088251147 cites W2971145967 @default.
• W3088251147 cites W2978706021 @default.
• W3088251147 cites W2984103126 @default.
• W3088251147 cites W3007522058 @default.
• W3088251147 cites W3009083458 @default.
• W3088251147 cites W3011379101 @default.
• W3088251147 cites W4294215472 @default.
• W3088251147 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2020.07.003" @default.
• W3088251147 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/7773978" @default.
• W3088251147 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33437622" @default.
• W3088251147 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3088251147 type Work @default.
• W3088251147 sameAs 3088251147 @default.
• W3088251147 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W3088251147 countsByYear W30882511472022 @default.
• W3088251147 countsByYear W30882511472023 @default.
• W3088251147 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3088251147 hasAuthorship W3088251147A5026030503 @default.
• W3088251147 hasAuthorship W3088251147A5033060653 @default.
• W3088251147 hasAuthorship W3088251147A5037858093 @default.
• W3088251147 hasAuthorship W3088251147A5047054215 @default.
• W3088251147 hasAuthorship W3088251147A5051186597 @default.
• W3088251147 hasAuthorship W3088251147A5073362698 @default.
• W3088251147 hasAuthorship W3088251147A5076339795 @default.
• W3088251147 hasBestOaLocation W30882511471 @default.
• W3088251147 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3088251147 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3088251147 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W3088251147 hasConcept C2779480328 @default.
• W3088251147 hasConcept C2779631646 @default.
• W3088251147 hasConcept C2780175798 @default.
• W3088251147 hasConcept C44575665 @default.
• W3088251147 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3088251147 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W3088251147 hasConceptScore W3088251147C126322002 @default.
• W3088251147 hasConceptScore W3088251147C141071460 @default.
• W3088251147 hasConceptScore W3088251147C168563851 @default.
• W3088251147 hasConceptScore W3088251147C2779480328 @default.
• W3088251147 hasConceptScore W3088251147C2779631646 @default.
• W3088251147 hasConceptScore W3088251147C2780175798 @default.
• W3088251147 hasConceptScore W3088251147C44575665 @default.
• W3088251147 hasConceptScore W3088251147C71924100 @default.
• W3088251147 hasConceptScore W3088251147C95190672 @default.
• W3088251147 hasLocation W30882511471 @default.
• W3088251147 hasLocation W30882511472 @default.
• W3088251147 hasLocation W30882511473 @default.
• W3088251147 hasLocation W30882511474 @default.
• W3088251147 hasOpenAccess W3088251147 @default.
• W3088251147 hasPrimaryLocation W30882511471 @default.
• W3088251147 hasRelatedWork W175998491 @default.
• W3088251147 hasRelatedWork W1964624127 @default.
• W3088251147 hasRelatedWork W2222783661 @default.
• W3088251147 hasRelatedWork W2363197838 @default.
• W3088251147 hasRelatedWork W2381882554 @default.

• next