FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3088398759> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3088398759 abstract "Project Summary This project was designed to identify the factors that influenced French Court of Cassation (the Supreme Court for criminal law) decisions in hate speech cases. We identified all 103 substantive hate speech cases reviewed by the Court of Cassation between the inception of a major anti-racism law in 1972 and the end of 2012. We then identified categories of interviewees distributed across different types (judges, prosecutors, lawyers, NGOs, academics). We combined the information gathered from these interviews with information from the written court decisions as well as archival information detailing some internal deliberations of the court. The main conclusion of the research is that French judges are influenced to a significant degree by the social identity of the victim group, but that this influence has shifted over time. In general, the court has been much more apt to uphold convictions if the targets of the hate speech were understood as vulnerable minorities who are victims of true racism than if the targets were societal majorities such as whites, Catholics, Christians, or French. Data Abstract Interviewees were selected according to procedures outlined in Bleich & Pekkanen (2013). Interviews were conducted in France, primarily between July 2014 and July 2015. Most were done in person, though some are phone interviews and some were email exchanges. Most interview records submitted here are the author's summaries of the interviews rather than transcripts. They are based on simultaneous note-taking supplemented by post-interview additions and edits. A few have been edited after the fact based on the interviewee's reading of the notes and amendments. The interview data was one key portion of evidence assembled to address the question of how the French high court decided hate speech cases. Written French court decisions are typically short, and do not contain as much information as, for example, US Supreme Court decisions, nor do they contain information about divisions within the court. So the interview data reveals information that goes beyond what is available in the written record. In addition, I relied on information on internal deliberations by court-appointed representatives (judges and prosecutors) derived from an archive for which I was granted access permission. I do not have permission to share this information, nor to reproduce the original court decisions." @default.
• W3088398759 created "2020-10-01" @default.
• W3088398759 creator A5010513672 @default.
• W3088398759 date "2018-04-10" @default.
• W3088398759 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W3088398759 title "Hate speech and France's court of cassation" @default.
• W3088398759 doi "https://doi.org/10.5064/f6833q5k" @default.
• W3088398759 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W3088398759 type Work @default.
• W3088398759 sameAs 3088398759 @default.
• W3088398759 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3088398759 crossrefType "dataset" @default.
• W3088398759 hasAuthorship W3088398759A5010513672 @default.
• W3088398759 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W3088398759 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W3088398759 hasConcept C139838865 @default.
• W3088398759 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W3088398759 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W3088398759 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3088398759 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3088398759 hasConcept C24890656 @default.
• W3088398759 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
• W3088398759 hasConcept C2778355321 @default.
• W3088398759 hasConcept C2778707766 @default.
• W3088398759 hasConcept C2991949126 @default.
• W3088398759 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W3088398759 hasConcept C55447825 @default.
• W3088398759 hasConceptScore W3088398759C121332964 @default.
• W3088398759 hasConceptScore W3088398759C138885662 @default.
• W3088398759 hasConceptScore W3088398759C139838865 @default.
• W3088398759 hasConceptScore W3088398759C144024400 @default.
• W3088398759 hasConceptScore W3088398759C15744967 @default.
• W3088398759 hasConceptScore W3088398759C17744445 @default.
• W3088398759 hasConceptScore W3088398759C199539241 @default.
• W3088398759 hasConceptScore W3088398759C24890656 @default.
• W3088398759 hasConceptScore W3088398759C2778272461 @default.
• W3088398759 hasConceptScore W3088398759C2778355321 @default.
• W3088398759 hasConceptScore W3088398759C2778707766 @default.
• W3088398759 hasConceptScore W3088398759C2991949126 @default.
• W3088398759 hasConceptScore W3088398759C41895202 @default.
• W3088398759 hasConceptScore W3088398759C55447825 @default.
• W3088398759 hasLocation W30883987591 @default.
• W3088398759 hasOpenAccess W3088398759 @default.
• W3088398759 hasPrimaryLocation W30883987591 @default.
• W3088398759 hasRelatedWork W10959497 @default.
• W3088398759 hasRelatedWork W1813242488 @default.
• W3088398759 hasRelatedWork W1986229944 @default.
• W3088398759 hasRelatedWork W2219442055 @default.
• W3088398759 hasRelatedWork W2272514079 @default.
• W3088398759 hasRelatedWork W2282742392 @default.
• W3088398759 hasRelatedWork W2342897904 @default.
• W3088398759 hasRelatedWork W2529496779 @default.
• W3088398759 hasRelatedWork W2583507051 @default.
• W3088398759 hasRelatedWork W2775651412 @default.
• W3088398759 hasRelatedWork W2802909600 @default.
• W3088398759 hasRelatedWork W2952185348 @default.
• W3088398759 hasRelatedWork W3111628732 @default.
• W3088398759 hasRelatedWork W3121137491 @default.
• W3088398759 hasRelatedWork W3121178117 @default.
• W3088398759 hasRelatedWork W3122274044 @default.
• W3088398759 hasRelatedWork W3124072955 @default.
• W3088398759 hasRelatedWork W3134456263 @default.
• W3088398759 hasRelatedWork W3199705558 @default.
• W3088398759 hasRelatedWork W633792386 @default.
• W3088398759 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3088398759 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3088398759 magId "3088398759" @default.
• W3088398759 workType "dataset" @default.