FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3089330174> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3089330174 endingPage "e9873" @default.
• W3089330174 startingPage "e9873" @default.
• W3089330174 abstract "Evidence-based conservation is urgently needed to identify, apply and promote effective interventions for mitigation of threats and recovery of the natural environment. Estimation of intervention effectiveness is subject to robust study design and statistical analysis, and much progress is documented in these fields. In contrast, little is understood about the accuracy and biases (underestimation and overestimation) of different effectiveness metrics and how they are affected by sample size.In this study, a dataset (n = 500 cases) consisting of random, positive, integer numbers was simulated to produce frequency input data for the 2 × 2 contingency table. For each case, three metrics of the relative risk, odds ratio and the magnitude of change were calculated, their disparity was estimated and the characteristics of treatment (with intervention) and control (without intervention) samples significantly affecting this disparity were studied by means of linear regression. Further, four case studies from different conservation interventions are provided to support the results.The study has shown that the relative risk and the magnitude of change produce identical estimates of intervention effectiveness only when treatment and control samples are equal, or when the number of target outcomes (e.g., number of livestock killed by predators) in treatment sample reaches zero. In other situations, the magnitude of change gives overestimates or underestimates, depending on relationships between treatment and control sample sizes. The table summarizing the conditions of equalities and biases between these two metrics is provided. These conditions are valid for both reduction-aimed interventions reducing negative target outcomes (e.g., livestock protection to reduce livestock losses to predators) and for addition-aimed interventions increasing positive target outcomes (e.g., establishment of protected areas to increase species presence). No significant effects on the odds ratio were found.Researchers should set equal treatment and control sample sizes so that to produce identical estimates of intervention effectiveness by the relative risk and the magnitude of change. Otherwise, these estimates are biased if produced by the magnitude of change and the relative risk should be used instead. As setting equal treatment and control samples can be impractical, I encourage researchers and practitioners to use the relative risk in estimation of intervention effectiveness. This will not take additional efforts as both metrics are calculated from the same contingency table. Treatment and control sample sizes, along with their sub-samples affected and not by an intervention, should be explicitly reported by researchers to allow independent evaluation of intervention effectiveness. This approach can help obtain more accurate information on intervention effectiveness for making better decisions in conservation actions." @default.
• W3089330174 created "2020-10-01" @default.
• W3089330174 creator A5014789552 @default.
• W3089330174 date "2020-09-23" @default.
• W3089330174 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W3089330174 title "A comparison of common metrics used to quantify the effectiveness of conservation interventions" @default.
• W3089330174 cites W1973605956 @default.
• W3089330174 cites W1997643348 @default.
• W3089330174 cites W2036475465 @default.
• W3089330174 cites W2050613698 @default.
• W3089330174 cites W2054613134 @default.
• W3089330174 cites W2055757491 @default.
• W3089330174 cites W2072274189 @default.
• W3089330174 cites W2096369236 @default.
• W3089330174 cites W2114999865 @default.
• W3089330174 cites W2132830638 @default.
• W3089330174 cites W2166233016 @default.
• W3089330174 cites W2179159630 @default.
• W3089330174 cites W2525625862 @default.
• W3089330174 cites W2562152678 @default.
• W3089330174 cites W2613079241 @default.
• W3089330174 cites W2618410637 @default.
• W3089330174 cites W2741058897 @default.
• W3089330174 cites W2767284855 @default.
• W3089330174 cites W2793459609 @default.
• W3089330174 cites W2890065063 @default.
• W3089330174 cites W2942893598 @default.
• W3089330174 cites W2947257697 @default.
• W3089330174 cites W2947323895 @default.
• W3089330174 cites W2951650421 @default.
• W3089330174 cites W2969017105 @default.
• W3089330174 cites W2971333488 @default.
• W3089330174 cites W2972694638 @default.
• W3089330174 cites W2974724369 @default.
• W3089330174 cites W2982411210 @default.
• W3089330174 cites W2994551910 @default.
• W3089330174 cites W3019508243 @default.
• W3089330174 cites W3020147183 @default.
• W3089330174 cites W3022030800 @default.
• W3089330174 cites W3035413126 @default.
• W3089330174 doi "https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9873" @default.
• W3089330174 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/7519717" @default.
• W3089330174 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33024627" @default.
• W3089330174 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3089330174 type Work @default.
• W3089330174 sameAs 3089330174 @default.
• W3089330174 citedByCount "8" @default.
• W3089330174 countsByYear W30893301742020 @default.
• W3089330174 countsByYear W30893301742021 @default.
• W3089330174 countsByYear W30893301742022 @default.
• W3089330174 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3089330174 hasAuthorship W3089330174A5014789552 @default.
• W3089330174 hasBestOaLocation W30893301741 @default.
• W3089330174 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W3089330174 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W3089330174 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W3089330174 hasConcept C121955636 @default.
• W3089330174 hasConcept C126691448 @default.
• W3089330174 hasConcept C1276947 @default.
• W3089330174 hasConcept C129848803 @default.
• W3089330174 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W3089330174 hasConcept C149782125 @default.
• W3089330174 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W3089330174 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W3089330174 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W3089330174 hasConcept C196083921 @default.
• W3089330174 hasConcept C198531522 @default.
• W3089330174 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W3089330174 hasConcept C2776502983 @default.
• W3089330174 hasConcept C2780665704 @default.
• W3089330174 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W3089330174 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W3089330174 hasConcept C43617362 @default.
• W3089330174 hasConcept C83546350 @default.
• W3089330174 hasConcept C91998498 @default.
• W3089330174 hasConceptScore W3089330174C105795698 @default.
• W3089330174 hasConceptScore W3089330174C118552586 @default.
• W3089330174 hasConceptScore W3089330174C121332964 @default.
• W3089330174 hasConceptScore W3089330174C121955636 @default.
• W3089330174 hasConceptScore W3089330174C126691448 @default.
• W3089330174 hasConceptScore W3089330174C1276947 @default.
• W3089330174 hasConceptScore W3089330174C129848803 @default.
• W3089330174 hasConceptScore W3089330174C144133560 @default.
• W3089330174 hasConceptScore W3089330174C149782125 @default.
• W3089330174 hasConceptScore W3089330174C154945302 @default.
• W3089330174 hasConceptScore W3089330174C15744967 @default.
• W3089330174 hasConceptScore W3089330174C185592680 @default.
• W3089330174 hasConceptScore W3089330174C196083921 @default.
• W3089330174 hasConceptScore W3089330174C198531522 @default.
• W3089330174 hasConceptScore W3089330174C27415008 @default.
• W3089330174 hasConceptScore W3089330174C2776502983 @default.
• W3089330174 hasConceptScore W3089330174C2780665704 @default.
• W3089330174 hasConceptScore W3089330174C33923547 @default.
• W3089330174 hasConceptScore W3089330174C41008148 @default.
• W3089330174 hasConceptScore W3089330174C43617362 @default.
• W3089330174 hasConceptScore W3089330174C83546350 @default.
• W3089330174 hasConceptScore W3089330174C91998498 @default.
• W3089330174 hasLocation W30893301741 @default.

• next