FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3089746796> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3089746796 endingPage "3292" @default.
• W3089746796 startingPage "3273" @default.
• W3089746796 abstract "To investigate childbearing women's views, experiences and decision-making related to epidural analgesia in labour. Mixed-methods systematic review. A comprehensive literature search was implemented across Medline, CINAHL and EMBASE from 2000 to September 2018. The literature search was undertaken in January 2018 and updated in September 2018. Thirty papers were selected. Four overarching synthesized findings were identified: (a) choice; (b) pain management experience; (c) lack of information; and (d) information provision and consent. Quality appraisal was conducted using JBI levels of evidence and other established tools. NVivo was used to independently dual code and thematically synthesize qualitative data. A narrative synthesis of the quantitative findings from the included studies was undertaken. The GRADE-CERQual approach was used to assess confidence in the review findings based on the qualitative data. A set of integrated mixed-methods synthesized findings was produced. Recommendations for practice based on the systematic review findings are that midwives should dedicate time to discuss epidural with women and birth partners, ideally during the second or third trimester of pregnancy, asking women what coping strategies or pain relief they have been considering, if any. The factors which may influence the woman's choice of epidural, including pain threshold, ability to cope with pain, timing of epidural and length of labour should be continuously evaluated during labour. The midwife should remain with women after an epidural has been sited, demonstrating understanding of the woman's choice and providing an opportunity for discussion of plans for the remaining labour and birth. The findings of this systematic review can inform both healthcare professionals and service users on various aspects of the decision-making process about the use of epidural analgesia in labour. Data can be transferable to similar settings in high-income countries. 调查育龄妇女对分娩时硬膜外镇痛的看法、经验和决策。 混合法系统评价。 2000年至2018年9月期间,在数据库Medline、CINAHL和EMBASE上实施了全面的文献检索。文献检索于2018年1月进行,2018年9月更新。选取了30篇论文。 确定了四项主要综合调查结果:(a)选择;(b)疼痛管理经验;(c)缺乏信息;以及(d)信息提供和同意。 利用JBI证据等级和其他既定工具进行质量评价。使用NVivo分析软件对定性数据进行独立的对偶码和主题综合。对纳入的研究中的定量结果进行了叙述性综合。采用GRADE-CERQual方法评估基于定性数据的审查结果的置信水平。编制了一套综合的混合法综合调查结果。 根据系统评价调查结果提出的实践建议是,助产士应专门抽出时间与妇女和分娩陪护人员讨论硬膜外麻醉,最好是在怀孕的第二个月或第三个月,询问产妇一直考虑的应对策略或疼痛减轻措施(如有)。在分娩过程中应持续评估可能影响产妇选择硬膜外镇痛的因素,包括疼痛阈值、应对疼痛的能力、硬膜外镇痛时间和分娩时间。在硬膜外麻醉已到位后,助产士应继续陪在产妇身边,对产妇的选择表示理解,并提供机会讨论后续分娩和生产计划。 本系统评价的调查结果可以为医疗保健专业人员和服务用户提供关于分娩时使用硬膜外镇痛的决策过程的各个方面的信息。在高收入国家的类似环境中,此类数据亦可转用。 None. The peer review history for this article is available at https://publons.com/publon/10.1111/jan.14555. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article." @default.
• W3089746796 created "2020-10-08" @default.
• W3089746796 creator A5015528242 @default.
• W3089746796 creator A5016531906 @default.
• W3089746796 creator A5016985072 @default.
• W3089746796 creator A5042333207 @default.
• W3089746796 creator A5057712305 @default.
• W3089746796 creator A5077245608 @default.
• W3089746796 date "2020-09-29" @default.
• W3089746796 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W3089746796 title "Mixed‐methods systematic review: Childbearing women's views, experiences, and decision‐making related to epidural analgesia in labour" @default.
• W3089746796 cites W1712572820 @default.
• W3089746796 cites W1854463540 @default.
• W3089746796 cites W1963571559 @default.
• W3089746796 cites W1969387000 @default.
• W3089746796 cites W1972535714 @default.
• W3089746796 cites W1977569236 @default.
• W3089746796 cites W1979134551 @default.
• W3089746796 cites W1982460292 @default.
• W3089746796 cites W1985554918 @default.
• W3089746796 cites W1987828652 @default.
• W3089746796 cites W1989233784 @default.
• W3089746796 cites W1991897210 @default.
• W3089746796 cites W1994169336 @default.
• W3089746796 cites W1995586345 @default.
• W3089746796 cites W1998738342 @default.
• W3089746796 cites W2002300033 @default.
• W3089746796 cites W2006539568 @default.
• W3089746796 cites W2016384869 @default.
• W3089746796 cites W2034098770 @default.
• W3089746796 cites W2036846620 @default.
• W3089746796 cites W2040825257 @default.
• W3089746796 cites W2041493701 @default.
• W3089746796 cites W2041625994 @default.
• W3089746796 cites W2044632849 @default.
• W3089746796 cites W2048653279 @default.
• W3089746796 cites W2050718613 @default.
• W3089746796 cites W2065109449 @default.
• W3089746796 cites W2067741638 @default.
• W3089746796 cites W2070316905 @default.
• W3089746796 cites W2070871485 @default.
• W3089746796 cites W2072704347 @default.
• W3089746796 cites W2077379575 @default.
• W3089746796 cites W2083089932 @default.
• W3089746796 cites W2100724506 @default.
• W3089746796 cites W2103858265 @default.
• W3089746796 cites W2109305774 @default.
• W3089746796 cites W2117416588 @default.
• W3089746796 cites W2128951337 @default.
• W3089746796 cites W2131168860 @default.
• W3089746796 cites W2143680823 @default.
• W3089746796 cites W2147927650 @default.
• W3089746796 cites W2166944732 @default.
• W3089746796 cites W2236800686 @default.
• W3089746796 cites W2415046331 @default.
• W3089746796 cites W2468996569 @default.
• W3089746796 cites W2559994264 @default.
• W3089746796 cites W2610665265 @default.
• W3089746796 cites W2754534694 @default.
• W3089746796 cites W2784472800 @default.
• W3089746796 cites W2807807445 @default.
• W3089746796 cites W2906715785 @default.
• W3089746796 cites W2958265015 @default.
• W3089746796 cites W4237849171 @default.
• W3089746796 cites W4253465206 @default.
• W3089746796 cites W2643974673 @default.
• W3089746796 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14555" @default.
• W3089746796 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32989801" @default.
• W3089746796 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3089746796 type Work @default.
• W3089746796 sameAs 3089746796 @default.
• W3089746796 citedByCount "7" @default.
• W3089746796 countsByYear W30897467962021 @default.
• W3089746796 countsByYear W30897467962022 @default.
• W3089746796 countsByYear W30897467962023 @default.
• W3089746796 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3089746796 hasAuthorship W3089746796A5015528242 @default.
• W3089746796 hasAuthorship W3089746796A5016531906 @default.
• W3089746796 hasAuthorship W3089746796A5016985072 @default.
• W3089746796 hasAuthorship W3089746796A5042333207 @default.
• W3089746796 hasAuthorship W3089746796A5057712305 @default.
• W3089746796 hasAuthorship W3089746796A5077245608 @default.
• W3089746796 hasBestOaLocation W30897467962 @default.
• W3089746796 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
• W3089746796 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W3089746796 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W3089746796 hasConcept C152541439 @default.
• W3089746796 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W3089746796 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W3089746796 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3089746796 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
• W3089746796 hasConcept C190248442 @default.
• W3089746796 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3089746796 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W3089746796 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W3089746796 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W3089746796 hasConcept C2781145037 @default.
• W3089746796 hasConcept C36289849 @default.

• next