FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3089936614> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3089936614 endingPage "e036842" @default.
• W3089936614 startingPage "e036842" @default.
• W3089936614 abstract "Objectives To determine whether a collaborative model of care that uses task-sharing for the management of low-risk diabetic retinopathy, Community Eye Care (C-EYE-C), can improve access to care and better use resources, compared with hospital-based care. Design Retrospective audit of medical and financial records to compare two models of care. Setting A large, urban tertiary Australian publicly funded hospital. Intervention C-EYE-C is a collaborative care model, involving community-based optometrist assessment and ‘virtual review’ by ophthalmologists to manage low-risk patients. The C-EYE-C model of care was implemented from January to October 2017. Participants New low-risk patient referrals with diabetes received at a tertiary hospital ophthalmology unit. Primary and secondary outcomes Historical standard hospital care was compared with C-EYE-C for attendance, wait-times, outcomes and costs. Clinical concordance between the optometrist and ophthalmologist diagnosis and management was assessed using weighted kappa statistic. Results There were 133 new low-risk referrals, managed in standard hospital care (n=68) and C-EYE-C (n=65). Attendance rates were similar between the models of care (72.1% hospital vs 67.7% C-EYE-C, p=0.71). C-EYE-C had shorter appointment wait-time (53 vs 118 days, p<0.01). In the C-EYE-C model of care, 68.2% of patients did not require hospital appointments and costs were 43% less than hospital care. There was substantial agreement between optometrists and ophthalmologists for diagnosis (κ=0.64, CI 0.47–0.81) and management (κ=0.66, CI 0.45–0.87). Conclusion This Australian study showed that collaborative eye care resulted in reduced patient waiting times and considerable cost-savings, while maintaining a high standard of patient care compared with traditional hospital-based care in the management of low-risk hospital referrals with diabetic eye disease. The improved access and reduced costs were largely the result of better task allocation through greater utilisation of primary eye care professionals to provide services for low-risk patients. Better resource use may free up further resources for other eye care services." @default.
• W3089936614 created "2020-10-08" @default.
• W3089936614 creator A5009006997 @default.
• W3089936614 creator A5011236728 @default.
• W3089936614 creator A5018800623 @default.
• W3089936614 creator A5028613701 @default.
• W3089936614 creator A5029647852 @default.
• W3089936614 creator A5040797906 @default.
• W3089936614 creator A5071601092 @default.
• W3089936614 creator A5078405679 @default.
• W3089936614 creator A5084839620 @default.
• W3089936614 date "2020-10-01" @default.
• W3089936614 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W3089936614 title "Evaluating the cost and wait-times of a task-sharing model of care for diabetic eye care: a case study from Australia" @default.
• W3089936614 cites W1928767093 @default.
• W3089936614 cites W1979498940 @default.
• W3089936614 cites W1989347911 @default.
• W3089936614 cites W2020267609 @default.
• W3089936614 cites W2020437639 @default.
• W3089936614 cites W2024475596 @default.
• W3089936614 cites W2030918129 @default.
• W3089936614 cites W2031784809 @default.
• W3089936614 cites W2038955015 @default.
• W3089936614 cites W2056671681 @default.
• W3089936614 cites W2057203552 @default.
• W3089936614 cites W2097858284 @default.
• W3089936614 cites W2138480916 @default.
• W3089936614 cites W2170722623 @default.
• W3089936614 cites W2272914471 @default.
• W3089936614 cites W2410726127 @default.
• W3089936614 cites W2526891826 @default.
• W3089936614 cites W2591232282 @default.
• W3089936614 cites W2761604622 @default.
• W3089936614 cites W2782502566 @default.
• W3089936614 cites W2984629995 @default.
• W3089936614 cites W3042246469 @default.
• W3089936614 doi "https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036842" @default.
• W3089936614 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/7537459" @default.
• W3089936614 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33020087" @default.
• W3089936614 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3089936614 type Work @default.
• W3089936614 sameAs 3089936614 @default.
• W3089936614 citedByCount "8" @default.
• W3089936614 countsByYear W30899366142021 @default.
• W3089936614 countsByYear W30899366142022 @default.
• W3089936614 countsByYear W30899366142023 @default.
• W3089936614 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3089936614 hasAuthorship W3089936614A5009006997 @default.
• W3089936614 hasAuthorship W3089936614A5011236728 @default.
• W3089936614 hasAuthorship W3089936614A5018800623 @default.
• W3089936614 hasAuthorship W3089936614A5028613701 @default.
• W3089936614 hasAuthorship W3089936614A5029647852 @default.
• W3089936614 hasAuthorship W3089936614A5040797906 @default.
• W3089936614 hasAuthorship W3089936614A5071601092 @default.
• W3089936614 hasAuthorship W3089936614A5078405679 @default.
• W3089936614 hasAuthorship W3089936614A5084839620 @default.
• W3089936614 hasBestOaLocation W30899366141 @default.
• W3089936614 hasConcept C119767625 @default.
• W3089936614 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3089936614 hasConcept C134018914 @default.
• W3089936614 hasConcept C160798450 @default.
• W3089936614 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W3089936614 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
• W3089936614 hasConcept C194828623 @default.
• W3089936614 hasConcept C195910791 @default.
• W3089936614 hasConcept C199521495 @default.
• W3089936614 hasConcept C2778173179 @default.
• W3089936614 hasConcept C2779829184 @default.
• W3089936614 hasConcept C2992234860 @default.
• W3089936614 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W3089936614 hasConcept C545542383 @default.
• W3089936614 hasConcept C555293320 @default.
• W3089936614 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3089936614 hasConceptScore W3089936614C119767625 @default.
• W3089936614 hasConceptScore W3089936614C126322002 @default.
• W3089936614 hasConceptScore W3089936614C134018914 @default.
• W3089936614 hasConceptScore W3089936614C160798450 @default.
• W3089936614 hasConceptScore W3089936614C162324750 @default.
• W3089936614 hasConceptScore W3089936614C187736073 @default.
• W3089936614 hasConceptScore W3089936614C194828623 @default.
• W3089936614 hasConceptScore W3089936614C195910791 @default.
• W3089936614 hasConceptScore W3089936614C199521495 @default.
• W3089936614 hasConceptScore W3089936614C2778173179 @default.
• W3089936614 hasConceptScore W3089936614C2779829184 @default.
• W3089936614 hasConceptScore W3089936614C2992234860 @default.
• W3089936614 hasConceptScore W3089936614C50522688 @default.
• W3089936614 hasConceptScore W3089936614C545542383 @default.
• W3089936614 hasConceptScore W3089936614C555293320 @default.
• W3089936614 hasConceptScore W3089936614C71924100 @default.
• W3089936614 hasIssue "10" @default.
• W3089936614 hasLocation W30899366141 @default.
• W3089936614 hasLocation W30899366142 @default.
• W3089936614 hasOpenAccess W3089936614 @default.
• W3089936614 hasPrimaryLocation W30899366141 @default.
• W3089936614 hasRelatedWork W1975120855 @default.
• W3089936614 hasRelatedWork W1975327380 @default.
• W3089936614 hasRelatedWork W2069547859 @default.
• W3089936614 hasRelatedWork W2108997409 @default.

• next