Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3090356525> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 93 of
93
with 100 items per page.
- W3090356525 endingPage "896" @default.
- W3090356525 startingPage "890" @default.
- W3090356525 abstract "BackgroundPatients' peak inspiratory flow rate (PIFR) may help clinicians select an inhaler device.ObjectiveTo determine the proportion of patients with asthma who could generate correct PIFRs at different inhaler resistance settings.MethodsDuring a UK asthma review service, patients' PIFR was checked at resistance settings matching their current preventer inhaler device, at R5 (high-resistance dry powder inhaler [DPI]) and at R0 (low resistance, pressurized metered dose inhaler [pMDI]). Correct PIFR (“pass”) was defined for R5 as 30 to 90 L/min and for R0 as 20 to 60 L/min. A logistic regression model examined the independent predictors of incorrect PIFR (“fail”) at R5 and R0. Asthma severity was assessed retrospectively from treatment level.ResultsA total of 994 adults (females 64.3%) were included, of whom 90.4% currently used a preventer inhaler (71.5% pMDI). PIFR pass rates were 93.7% at R5 compared with 70.5% at R0 (P < .0001). All patients failing the R0 PIFR breathed in too fast (>60 L/min), and 20% of patients currently using pMDI failed for this reason. Independent risk factors for failing R5 were female sex, older age group, and current preventer pMDI and for failing R0 included male sex, younger age group, current preventer DPI, and mild versus severe asthma.ConclusionsThis study demonstrates that most patients with asthma can achieve adequate inspiratory flow to activate high-resistance DPIs, whereas approximately a third of patients breathe in too fast to achieve recommended inspiratory flows for correct pMDI use, including one-fifth of patients who currently use a pMDI preventer. Patients' peak inspiratory flow rate (PIFR) may help clinicians select an inhaler device. To determine the proportion of patients with asthma who could generate correct PIFRs at different inhaler resistance settings. During a UK asthma review service, patients' PIFR was checked at resistance settings matching their current preventer inhaler device, at R5 (high-resistance dry powder inhaler [DPI]) and at R0 (low resistance, pressurized metered dose inhaler [pMDI]). Correct PIFR (“pass”) was defined for R5 as 30 to 90 L/min and for R0 as 20 to 60 L/min. A logistic regression model examined the independent predictors of incorrect PIFR (“fail”) at R5 and R0. Asthma severity was assessed retrospectively from treatment level. A total of 994 adults (females 64.3%) were included, of whom 90.4% currently used a preventer inhaler (71.5% pMDI). PIFR pass rates were 93.7% at R5 compared with 70.5% at R0 (P < .0001). All patients failing the R0 PIFR breathed in too fast (>60 L/min), and 20% of patients currently using pMDI failed for this reason. Independent risk factors for failing R5 were female sex, older age group, and current preventer pMDI and for failing R0 included male sex, younger age group, current preventer DPI, and mild versus severe asthma. This study demonstrates that most patients with asthma can achieve adequate inspiratory flow to activate high-resistance DPIs, whereas approximately a third of patients breathe in too fast to achieve recommended inspiratory flows for correct pMDI use, including one-fifth of patients who currently use a pMDI preventer." @default.
- W3090356525 created "2020-10-08" @default.
- W3090356525 creator A5019752519 @default.
- W3090356525 creator A5034409252 @default.
- W3090356525 creator A5034832224 @default.
- W3090356525 creator A5048090792 @default.
- W3090356525 creator A5059657782 @default.
- W3090356525 creator A5070924341 @default.
- W3090356525 date "2021-02-01" @default.
- W3090356525 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
- W3090356525 title "Peak Inspiratory Flow Measured at Different Inhaler Resistances in Patients with Asthma" @default.
- W3090356525 cites W2007699290 @default.
- W3090356525 cites W2100898694 @default.
- W3090356525 cites W2101909755 @default.
- W3090356525 cites W2132445095 @default.
- W3090356525 cites W2133893447 @default.
- W3090356525 cites W2135430370 @default.
- W3090356525 cites W2137498215 @default.
- W3090356525 cites W2144455511 @default.
- W3090356525 cites W2168551021 @default.
- W3090356525 cites W2170637423 @default.
- W3090356525 cites W2319957578 @default.
- W3090356525 cites W2327145125 @default.
- W3090356525 cites W2493444967 @default.
- W3090356525 cites W2592766983 @default.
- W3090356525 cites W2610898817 @default.
- W3090356525 cites W2758140560 @default.
- W3090356525 cites W2770700164 @default.
- W3090356525 cites W2795857568 @default.
- W3090356525 cites W2889264430 @default.
- W3090356525 cites W2920976641 @default.
- W3090356525 cites W2971782027 @default.
- W3090356525 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2020.09.026" @default.
- W3090356525 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33011302" @default.
- W3090356525 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
- W3090356525 type Work @default.
- W3090356525 sameAs 3090356525 @default.
- W3090356525 citedByCount "15" @default.
- W3090356525 countsByYear W30903565252021 @default.
- W3090356525 countsByYear W30903565252022 @default.
- W3090356525 countsByYear W30903565252023 @default.
- W3090356525 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3090356525 hasAuthorship W3090356525A5019752519 @default.
- W3090356525 hasAuthorship W3090356525A5034409252 @default.
- W3090356525 hasAuthorship W3090356525A5034832224 @default.
- W3090356525 hasAuthorship W3090356525A5048090792 @default.
- W3090356525 hasAuthorship W3090356525A5059657782 @default.
- W3090356525 hasAuthorship W3090356525A5070924341 @default.
- W3090356525 hasBestOaLocation W30903565251 @default.
- W3090356525 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W3090356525 hasConcept C151956035 @default.
- W3090356525 hasConcept C2776042228 @default.
- W3090356525 hasConcept C2777419714 @default.
- W3090356525 hasConcept C2780261241 @default.
- W3090356525 hasConcept C2780667556 @default.
- W3090356525 hasConcept C2908933175 @default.
- W3090356525 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W3090356525 hasConceptScore W3090356525C126322002 @default.
- W3090356525 hasConceptScore W3090356525C151956035 @default.
- W3090356525 hasConceptScore W3090356525C2776042228 @default.
- W3090356525 hasConceptScore W3090356525C2777419714 @default.
- W3090356525 hasConceptScore W3090356525C2780261241 @default.
- W3090356525 hasConceptScore W3090356525C2780667556 @default.
- W3090356525 hasConceptScore W3090356525C2908933175 @default.
- W3090356525 hasConceptScore W3090356525C71924100 @default.
- W3090356525 hasFunder F4320307770 @default.
- W3090356525 hasFunder F4320307773 @default.
- W3090356525 hasFunder F4320307781 @default.
- W3090356525 hasFunder F4320308970 @default.
- W3090356525 hasFunder F4320309888 @default.
- W3090356525 hasIssue "2" @default.
- W3090356525 hasLocation W30903565251 @default.
- W3090356525 hasLocation W30903565252 @default.
- W3090356525 hasLocation W30903565253 @default.
- W3090356525 hasOpenAccess W3090356525 @default.
- W3090356525 hasPrimaryLocation W30903565251 @default.
- W3090356525 hasRelatedWork W1735104919 @default.
- W3090356525 hasRelatedWork W1963533408 @default.
- W3090356525 hasRelatedWork W2062333112 @default.
- W3090356525 hasRelatedWork W2095548954 @default.
- W3090356525 hasRelatedWork W2168023277 @default.
- W3090356525 hasRelatedWork W2349766323 @default.
- W3090356525 hasRelatedWork W2410272602 @default.
- W3090356525 hasRelatedWork W260888380 @default.
- W3090356525 hasRelatedWork W2992741235 @default.
- W3090356525 hasRelatedWork W3201424146 @default.
- W3090356525 hasVolume "9" @default.
- W3090356525 isParatext "false" @default.
- W3090356525 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W3090356525 magId "3090356525" @default.
- W3090356525 workType "article" @default.