FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W309219069> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W309219069 startingPage "1059" @default.
• W309219069 abstract "Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause jurisprudence has undergone dramatic retooling in recent years, with the Supreme Court jettisoning the reliability-focused test of Ohio v. Roberts (1) as permanently[] unpredictable and lacking historical justification. (2) In an effort restore coherence the doctrine, the banner decision of Crawford v. Washington introduced new analytical framework: the Confrontation Clause protects the criminally accused against the admission of out-of-court statements that are testimonial in nature, unless the declarant is unavailable and the defendant has had prior opportunity cross-examine him. (3) Crawford was heralded as a return constitutional roots (4) and a successful blend of originalism and formalism, (5) even as it declined articulate comprehensive definition of testimonial. (6) Last Term, in the consolidated cases Davis v. Washington and Hammon v. Indiana, (7) the Court held that statements are testimonial when circumstances objectively indicate that the interrogation's primary purpose is to establish or prove past events potentially relevant later criminal prosecution, and are nontestimonial when the primary purpose is to enable police assistance meet an ongoing emergency. (8) Although providing crucial elaboration on the framework for addressing testimonial statements, the Court's opposing outcomes in Davis and Hammon muddy the originalist, bright-line spirit of Crawford. (9) Rather than providing clear guidance for police and lower courts, the Court advanced distinctions that are illusory and inadministrable and that encourage police circumvent the confrontation right at heavy cost victims. Davis, domestic violence case in which the complainant later refused testify, brought into focus the extent which prosecutions may proceed without confrontation. On February 1, 2001, 911 dispatcher received hang-up call from Michelle McCottry in the midst of domestic dispute with her former boyfriend, Adrian Davis. (10) When the emergency operator traced the call and reached McCottry, she learned that Davis was [t]here jumpin' on [McCottry] again. (11) McCottry the operator that Davis had been usin' his fists (12) beat her and described him running out of the door. (13) Within minutes, two police officers arrived on the scene and witnessed McCottry's frantic efforts gather her belongings and her children while displaying what looked like fresh injuries on her forearm and her face. (14) Davis was charged with violating no-contact order. (15) Because McCottry failed appear at trial, (16) the State's only witnesses were the responding officers. The officers were unable testify as how McCottry's injuries had been inflicted; the sole evidence attributing her injuries Davis was the tape recorded exchange between her and the emergency operator. (17) The trial court, despite Davis's objections, deemed the tape recording admissible, and Davis was found guilty. (18) The Washington Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction, holding that the trial court's admission of the recording was appropriate and consistent with Davis's confrontation right. (19) The Supreme Court of Washington affirmed en banc. (20) Applying the Crawford framework, the court concluded that McCottry's naming of Davis as her assailant on the recording was nontestimonial, and dismissed any hypothetical error in admitting the remainder of the recording as harmless beyond reasonable doubt. (21) Hammon involved another domestic violence case, reported responding police officers on-the-scene rather than 911 operator. On February 26, 2003, two officers were dispatched the residence of Indiana couple Hershel and Amy Hammon. (22) Amy stood by herself on the front porch, and although she told them that 'nothing was the matter,' she appear[ed] 'somewhat frightened.' (23) The officers secured Amy's consent their entry into the house, where they observed a gas heating unit in the corner of the living room with flames coming out of the . …" @default.
• W309219069 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W309219069 creator A5030878869 @default.
• W309219069 date "2007-06-22" @default.
• W309219069 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W309219069 title "Convoluting the Confrontation Right: Davis V. Washington" @default.
• W309219069 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W309219069 type Work @default.
• W309219069 sameAs 309219069 @default.
• W309219069 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W309219069 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W309219069 hasAuthorship W309219069A5030878869 @default.
• W309219069 hasConcept C112698675 @default.
• W309219069 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W309219069 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W309219069 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W309219069 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W309219069 hasConcept C2776211767 @default.
• W309219069 hasConcept C2776217807 @default.
• W309219069 hasConcept C2778102385 @default.
• W309219069 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
• W309219069 hasConcept C2778637750 @default.
• W309219069 hasConcept C2780066029 @default.
• W309219069 hasConcept C71043370 @default.
• W309219069 hasConcept C97460637 @default.
• W309219069 hasConceptScore W309219069C112698675 @default.
• W309219069 hasConceptScore W309219069C144024400 @default.
• W309219069 hasConceptScore W309219069C144133560 @default.
• W309219069 hasConceptScore W309219069C17744445 @default.
• W309219069 hasConceptScore W309219069C199539241 @default.
• W309219069 hasConceptScore W309219069C2776211767 @default.
• W309219069 hasConceptScore W309219069C2776217807 @default.
• W309219069 hasConceptScore W309219069C2778102385 @default.
• W309219069 hasConceptScore W309219069C2778272461 @default.
• W309219069 hasConceptScore W309219069C2778637750 @default.
• W309219069 hasConceptScore W309219069C2780066029 @default.
• W309219069 hasConceptScore W309219069C71043370 @default.
• W309219069 hasConceptScore W309219069C97460637 @default.
• W309219069 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W309219069 hasLocation W3092190691 @default.
• W309219069 hasOpenAccess W309219069 @default.
• W309219069 hasPrimaryLocation W3092190691 @default.
• W309219069 hasRelatedWork W11140458 @default.
• W309219069 hasRelatedWork W1272071412 @default.
• W309219069 hasRelatedWork W135279480 @default.
• W309219069 hasRelatedWork W1570521552 @default.
• W309219069 hasRelatedWork W1584387555 @default.
• W309219069 hasRelatedWork W202170321 @default.
• W309219069 hasRelatedWork W212605004 @default.
• W309219069 hasRelatedWork W2203706131 @default.
• W309219069 hasRelatedWork W2338872725 @default.
• W309219069 hasRelatedWork W2512399267 @default.
• W309219069 hasRelatedWork W259897642 @default.
• W309219069 hasRelatedWork W2602547059 @default.
• W309219069 hasRelatedWork W273209107 @default.
• W309219069 hasRelatedWork W32454451 @default.
• W309219069 hasRelatedWork W325225104 @default.
• W309219069 hasRelatedWork W346410745 @default.
• W309219069 hasRelatedWork W795964511 @default.
• W309219069 hasRelatedWork W862849940 @default.
• W309219069 hasRelatedWork W9373352 @default.
• W309219069 hasRelatedWork W2604435868 @default.
• W309219069 hasVolume "30" @default.
• W309219069 isParatext "false" @default.
• W309219069 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W309219069 magId "309219069" @default.
• W309219069 workType "article" @default.