FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3093156970> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3093156970 endingPage "248" @default.
• W3093156970 startingPage "240" @default.
• W3093156970 abstract "BACKGROUND Clinical equipoise exists regarding optimal sequencing in the definitive management of choledocholithiasis. Our current study compares sequential biliary ductal clearance and cholecystectomy at an interval to simultaneous laparoendoscopic management on index admission in a pragmatic retrospective manner. METHODS Records were reviewed for all patients admitted between January 2015 and December 2018 to a Swedish and an Irish university hospital. Both hospitals differ in their practice patterns for definitive management of choledocholithiasis. At the Swedish hospital, patients with choledocholithiasis underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with intraoperative rendezvous endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) at index admission (one stage). In contrast, interval day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy followed index admission ERCP (two stages) at the Irish hospital. Clinical characteristics, postprocedural complications, and inpatient duration were compared between cohorts. RESULTS Three hundred fifty-seven patients underwent treatment for choledocholithiasis during the study period, of whom 222 (62.2%) underwent a one-stage procedure in Sweden, while 135 (37.8%) underwent treatment in two stages in Ireland. Patients in both cohorts were closely matched in terms of age, sex, and preoperative serum total bilirubin. Patients in the one-stage group exhibited a greater inflammatory reaction on index admission (peak C-reactive protein, 136 ± 137 vs. 95 ± 102 mg/L; p = 0.024), had higher incidence of comorbidities (age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index, ≥3; 37.8% vs. 20.0%; p = 0.003), and overall were less fit for surgery (American Society of Anesthesiologists, ≥3; 11.7% vs. 3.7%; p < 0.001). Despite this, a significantly shorter mean time to definitive treatment, that is, cholecystectomy (3.1 ± 2.5 vs. 40.3 ± 127 days, p = 0.017), without excess morbidity, was seen in the one-stage compared with the two-stage cohort. Patients in the one-stage cohort experienced shorter mean postprocedure length of stay (3.0 ± 4.7 vs. 5.0 ± 4.6 days, p < 0.001) and total length of hospital stay (6.5 ± 4.6 vs. 9.0 ± 7.3 days, p = 0.002). The only significant difference in postoperative complications between the cohorts was urinary retention, with a higher incidence in the one-stage cohort (19% vs. 1%, p = 0.004). CONCLUSION Where appropriate expertise and logistics exist within developing models of acute care surgery worldwide, consideration should be given to index-admission laparoscopic cholecystectomy with intraoperative ERCP for the treatment of choledocholithiasis. Our data suggest that this strategy significantly shortens the time to definitive treatment and decreases total hospital stay without any excess in adverse outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic/Care Management Level IV." @default.
• W3093156970 created "2020-10-22" @default.
• W3093156970 creator A5010404210 @default.
• W3093156970 creator A5032058273 @default.
• W3093156970 creator A5039318852 @default.
• W3093156970 creator A5045938742 @default.
• W3093156970 creator A5052528002 @default.
• W3093156970 creator A5055486774 @default.
• W3093156970 creator A5066568458 @default.
• W3093156970 creator A5068137002 @default.
• W3093156970 creator A5075495807 @default.
• W3093156970 creator A5079286366 @default.
• W3093156970 creator A5081985163 @default.
• W3093156970 date "2020-10-19" @default.
• W3093156970 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W3093156970 title "Bile duct clearance and cholecystectomy for choledocholithiasis: Definitive single-stage laparoscopic cholecystectomy with intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography versus staged procedures" @default.
• W3093156970 cites W1747933014 @default.
• W3093156970 cites W1974600814 @default.
• W3093156970 cites W1984721620 @default.
• W3093156970 cites W1985523380 @default.
• W3093156970 cites W2047366475 @default.
• W3093156970 cites W2048039324 @default.
• W3093156970 cites W2058572518 @default.
• W3093156970 cites W2091503590 @default.
• W3093156970 cites W2096998881 @default.
• W3093156970 cites W2268286266 @default.
• W3093156970 cites W2510568613 @default.
• W3093156970 cites W2556888148 @default.
• W3093156970 cites W2582313049 @default.
• W3093156970 cites W2769458817 @default.
• W3093156970 cites W2786271045 @default.
• W3093156970 cites W2806491697 @default.
• W3093156970 cites W2835875617 @default.
• W3093156970 cites W2898593703 @default.
• W3093156970 cites W2899401918 @default.
• W3093156970 cites W3006853737 @default.
• W3093156970 cites W3025256075 @default.
• W3093156970 cites W3032408481 @default.
• W3093156970 cites W3034748030 @default.
• W3093156970 cites W3035644112 @default.
• W3093156970 cites W4244842864 @default.
• W3093156970 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/ta.0000000000002988" @default.
• W3093156970 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33075026" @default.
• W3093156970 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3093156970 type Work @default.
• W3093156970 sameAs 3093156970 @default.
• W3093156970 citedByCount "7" @default.
• W3093156970 countsByYear W30931569702021 @default.
• W3093156970 countsByYear W30931569702022 @default.
• W3093156970 countsByYear W30931569702023 @default.
• W3093156970 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3093156970 hasAuthorship W3093156970A5010404210 @default.
• W3093156970 hasAuthorship W3093156970A5032058273 @default.
• W3093156970 hasAuthorship W3093156970A5039318852 @default.
• W3093156970 hasAuthorship W3093156970A5045938742 @default.
• W3093156970 hasAuthorship W3093156970A5052528002 @default.
• W3093156970 hasAuthorship W3093156970A5055486774 @default.
• W3093156970 hasAuthorship W3093156970A5066568458 @default.
• W3093156970 hasAuthorship W3093156970A5068137002 @default.
• W3093156970 hasAuthorship W3093156970A5075495807 @default.
• W3093156970 hasAuthorship W3093156970A5079286366 @default.
• W3093156970 hasAuthorship W3093156970A5081985163 @default.
• W3093156970 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3093156970 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3093156970 hasConcept C146357865 @default.
• W3093156970 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W3093156970 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W3093156970 hasConcept C2775967933 @default.
• W3093156970 hasConcept C2776641081 @default.
• W3093156970 hasConcept C2778444009 @default.
• W3093156970 hasConcept C2779159551 @default.
• W3093156970 hasConcept C2779777945 @default.
• W3093156970 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W3093156970 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3093156970 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W3093156970 hasConceptScore W3093156970C126322002 @default.
• W3093156970 hasConceptScore W3093156970C141071460 @default.
• W3093156970 hasConceptScore W3093156970C146357865 @default.
• W3093156970 hasConceptScore W3093156970C151730666 @default.
• W3093156970 hasConceptScore W3093156970C167135981 @default.
• W3093156970 hasConceptScore W3093156970C2775967933 @default.
• W3093156970 hasConceptScore W3093156970C2776641081 @default.
• W3093156970 hasConceptScore W3093156970C2778444009 @default.
• W3093156970 hasConceptScore W3093156970C2779159551 @default.
• W3093156970 hasConceptScore W3093156970C2779777945 @default.
• W3093156970 hasConceptScore W3093156970C61434518 @default.
• W3093156970 hasConceptScore W3093156970C71924100 @default.
• W3093156970 hasConceptScore W3093156970C86803240 @default.
• W3093156970 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W3093156970 hasLocation W30931569701 @default.
• W3093156970 hasLocation W30931569702 @default.
• W3093156970 hasOpenAccess W3093156970 @default.
• W3093156970 hasPrimaryLocation W30931569701 @default.
• W3093156970 hasRelatedWork W1758437212 @default.
• W3093156970 hasRelatedWork W1764702949 @default.
• W3093156970 hasRelatedWork W2010979377 @default.
• W3093156970 hasRelatedWork W2181341581 @default.
• W3093156970 hasRelatedWork W2403483654 @default.

• next