FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W309352536> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W309352536 startingPage "124" @default.
• W309352536 abstract "In recent years, the notion has gained currency that a new form of eugenics may be in the process of emerging. This new eugenics has, it is claimed, managed to divest itself of the totalitarian associations of the past, and functions primarily by means of the ever-increasing use of genetic screening techniques. In The Future of Human Nature Jurgen Habermas has sought to engage with the philosophical and ethical implications of techniques such as preimplantation genetic diagnosis. (1) As he emphasises, developments in the area of genetics and biotechnology ultimately challenge our self-understanding as human beings. Although there have been any number of eugenic projects throughout history, the mainstream of humanist secular and religious thought in Europe has based the notion of the uniqueness of the individual upon the certainty that a human being's genetic endowment could not be programmed or manipulated in advance. (2) However, Habermas argues that, once manipulation does become possible, the 'rather ordinary contingency' of the individual's genetic inheritance--the uncontrollable result of human fertilisation--is thrown into question. If it becomes possible for parents to consider the genetic traits of their offspring as being open to manipulation, they begin to exercise a kind of control that intervenes in the ethical freedom of the unborn child. What Habermas calls 'organic nature' was previously either 'given' or, in the case of eugenics, 'bred', but now we face the possibility of it being produced as an 'artifact'. This situation raises the issue of whether this new possibility of genetic intervention necessitates normative regulation or can be seen simply as a means of individual 'self-empowerment' and of expressing individual preferences. In attempting to conceive of some sort of framework that might encourage informed regulation of such forms of genetic intervention, Habermas draws on the twin tenets of Kant's categorical imperative: the principle that human beings should always be treated as ends in themselves, along with the principle that we should act in conformity with what we perceive to be universal laws. (3) He also draws on Hannah Arendt's concept of 'natality', which is to say the link she perceives between birth and the 'beginning' that is inherent to all human action. It is only when we are on the point of mastering the contingency of our genetic inheritance, Habermas argues, that we realise how crucial the contingency of birth is to our conception of ourselves as individuals capable of action in the world. (4) Troy Duster, in Backdoor to Eugenics, has located this new eugenics within what he identifies as a gradual, almost imperceptible, shift towards the acceptance of a genetic paradigm in recent years, which threatens to facilitate a 'backdoor' route to eugenics. (5) He acknowledges that by the 1950s social-rather than hereditarian--theories appeared to have won the battle to explain and analyse the great human concerns of the era. However, he feels that, partly as a result of the fact that the new genetic technologies promise more immediate, practical, and apparently unproblematic gains for the individual, and partly because science quite simply makes such powerful and persuasive claims, genetic explanations have become increasingly prevalent. Pierre Bourdieu, in the foreword to Duster's book, sees the fact that characteristics such as intelligence and the propensity to violence are viewed in purely genetic terms as one symptom of a return to essentialism that characterises what he regards as the current era of cultural reaction and conservatism. (6) He fears that the outcome of this resurgence of essentialist thinking and the rise of the new biotechnologies will be the slow imposition of a eugenic worldview by means of routine bureaucratic practices of genetic intervention. Duster points to developments in the field of human molecular biology as a key component of this putative return to genetics and, from a historical perspective, Lily E. …" @default.
• W309352536 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W309352536 creator A5091393743 @default.
• W309352536 date "2007-03-22" @default.
• W309352536 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W309352536 title "The New Eugenics: Jacques Testart and French Bioethics" @default.
• W309352536 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W309352536 type Work @default.
• W309352536 sameAs 309352536 @default.
• W309352536 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W309352536 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W309352536 hasAuthorship W309352536A5091393743 @default.
• W309352536 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W309352536 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W309352536 hasConcept C140610115 @default.
• W309352536 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W309352536 hasConcept C153606108 @default.
• W309352536 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W309352536 hasConcept C188084074 @default.
• W309352536 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W309352536 hasConcept C551067111 @default.
• W309352536 hasConcept C95124753 @default.
• W309352536 hasConceptScore W309352536C111472728 @default.
• W309352536 hasConceptScore W309352536C138885662 @default.
• W309352536 hasConceptScore W309352536C140610115 @default.
• W309352536 hasConceptScore W309352536C144024400 @default.
• W309352536 hasConceptScore W309352536C153606108 @default.
• W309352536 hasConceptScore W309352536C17744445 @default.
• W309352536 hasConceptScore W309352536C188084074 @default.
• W309352536 hasConceptScore W309352536C199539241 @default.
• W309352536 hasConceptScore W309352536C551067111 @default.
• W309352536 hasConceptScore W309352536C95124753 @default.
• W309352536 hasIssue "60" @default.
• W309352536 hasLocation W3093525361 @default.
• W309352536 hasOpenAccess W309352536 @default.
• W309352536 hasPrimaryLocation W3093525361 @default.
• W309352536 hasRelatedWork W106786507 @default.
• W309352536 hasRelatedWork W145124097 @default.
• W309352536 hasRelatedWork W1489933888 @default.
• W309352536 hasRelatedWork W1494695363 @default.
• W309352536 hasRelatedWork W17712240 @default.
• W309352536 hasRelatedWork W1935360072 @default.
• W309352536 hasRelatedWork W2098363845 @default.
• W309352536 hasRelatedWork W212129567 @default.
• W309352536 hasRelatedWork W2270954719 @default.
• W309352536 hasRelatedWork W2303510627 @default.
• W309352536 hasRelatedWork W2323093509 @default.
• W309352536 hasRelatedWork W2487474497 @default.
• W309352536 hasRelatedWork W2490133950 @default.
• W309352536 hasRelatedWork W2505080812 @default.
• W309352536 hasRelatedWork W289977091 @default.
• W309352536 hasRelatedWork W3027077770 @default.
• W309352536 hasRelatedWork W3121973481 @default.
• W309352536 hasRelatedWork W321725386 @default.
• W309352536 hasRelatedWork W57724554 @default.
• W309352536 hasRelatedWork W861155086 @default.
• W309352536 isParatext "false" @default.
• W309352536 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W309352536 magId "309352536" @default.
• W309352536 workType "article" @default.