FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3093531176> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3093531176 endingPage "638" @default.
• W3093531176 startingPage "637" @default.
• W3093531176 abstract "I read the article entitled “The F Word: How ‘Fit' Threatens the Validity of Resident Recruitment” with great interest.1 Notably, the authors present “fit” as a nebulous term that is used to convey a gestalt impression, conceivably serving as a proxy for unconscious bias and a threat to diversity. To mitigate these risks, they propose that terms, such as “fit,” must have a clear and shared meaning.1 Fortunately, to meet the challenge of this recommendation, we can diversify our own perspectives by incorporating well-established concepts from industrial and organizational (I/O) psychology.2 I/O psychology is a recognized division of the American Psychological Association and is characterized by the scientific study of human behavior in organizations. Personnel psychology is a dedicated subfield that primarily deals with the recruitment, selection, and retention of personnel, in addition to the study of workplace culture and interpersonal relationships.2Beginning in the 1990s, applications of person–environment fit (P–E fit) theory, which refers to the alignment between characteristics of individuals and those of their job and workplace, became more explicit. One of the key articles in this movement is “Person–Environment Fit in the Selection Process” by Werbel and Gilliland.3 In their work, the authors proposed an expanded model of fit in personnel selection, which incorporates person–job, person–organization, and person–workgroup fit (figure). The descriptions that Werbel and Gilliland provided resonate with the recommendations by Shappell and Schnapp1 to reduce the potential negative effects that may arise from terms like “fit.” For example, person–organization fit is defined as the congruence of values, needs, and goals between an individual and organization.3 In their box, Shappell and Schnapp suggested that residency programs establish a clear brand identity, which includes clarifying values and goals.1 Then, if fostering self-starters is considered meaningful to the program, they can decide to preferentially rank applicants who have demonstrated an ability to create and develop new initiatives. Furthermore, Shappell and Schnapp proposed that when “fit creeps into the discussion” that the conversation be directed away from this word.1 However, instead of being fearful of this terminology, we should consider embracing it based on a broader understanding of its meaning. A different approach could be taken, in which a member of the selection committee states, “Based on the work we have done to identify our residency program's core values and goals, I believe that this applicant aligns better from the perspective of person–organization fit compared to this applicant.” Therefore, the framework of P–E fit offers the exact “deliberate language” that Shappell and Schnapp were seeking.Over the past decade, there has been a growing intradisciplinary collaboration between I/O psychology and the medical community.4 While the majority of these efforts have existed overseas, we are starting to see the positive impact of similar relationships in graduate medical education in the United States.5 By merging the contextual experience of our residency programs with the selection science expertise of I/O psychologists, we have the opportunity to engage in theory-driven studies that can ultimately promote diversity through a broader understanding of what it means to “fit.”" @default.
• W3093531176 created "2020-10-29" @default.
• W3093531176 creator A5086932028 @default.
• W3093531176 date "2020-10-01" @default.
• W3093531176 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W3093531176 title "“Fit” Has a Broader Meaning: Recognizing the Utility of Person–Environment Fit Theory in Residency Recruitment and Selection" @default.
• W3093531176 cites W2598892095 @default.
• W3093531176 cites W2601069446 @default.
• W3093531176 cites W2738592945 @default.
• W3093531176 cites W2995424678 @default.
• W3093531176 doi "https://doi.org/10.4300/jgme-d-20-00886.1" @default.
• W3093531176 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/7594772" @default.
• W3093531176 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33149839" @default.
• W3093531176 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3093531176 type Work @default.
• W3093531176 sameAs 3093531176 @default.
• W3093531176 citedByCount "7" @default.
• W3093531176 countsByYear W30935311762021 @default.
• W3093531176 countsByYear W30935311762022 @default.
• W3093531176 countsByYear W30935311762023 @default.
• W3093531176 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3093531176 hasAuthorship W3093531176A5086932028 @default.
• W3093531176 hasBestOaLocation W30935311761 @default.
• W3093531176 hasConcept C130497676 @default.
• W3093531176 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W3093531176 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W3093531176 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W3093531176 hasConcept C164850336 @default.
• W3093531176 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3093531176 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
• W3093531176 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3093531176 hasConcept C2777207495 @default.
• W3093531176 hasConcept C2780876879 @default.
• W3093531176 hasConcept C2781316041 @default.
• W3093531176 hasConcept C31258907 @default.
• W3093531176 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W3093531176 hasConcept C542102704 @default.
• W3093531176 hasConcept C75630572 @default.
• W3093531176 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W3093531176 hasConcept C81917197 @default.
• W3093531176 hasConcept C95423123 @default.
• W3093531176 hasConceptScore W3093531176C130497676 @default.
• W3093531176 hasConceptScore W3093531176C154945302 @default.
• W3093531176 hasConceptScore W3093531176C15744967 @default.
• W3093531176 hasConceptScore W3093531176C162324750 @default.
• W3093531176 hasConceptScore W3093531176C164850336 @default.
• W3093531176 hasConceptScore W3093531176C17744445 @default.
• W3093531176 hasConceptScore W3093531176C187736073 @default.
• W3093531176 hasConceptScore W3093531176C199539241 @default.
• W3093531176 hasConceptScore W3093531176C2777207495 @default.
• W3093531176 hasConceptScore W3093531176C2780876879 @default.
• W3093531176 hasConceptScore W3093531176C2781316041 @default.
• W3093531176 hasConceptScore W3093531176C31258907 @default.
• W3093531176 hasConceptScore W3093531176C41008148 @default.
• W3093531176 hasConceptScore W3093531176C542102704 @default.
• W3093531176 hasConceptScore W3093531176C75630572 @default.
• W3093531176 hasConceptScore W3093531176C77805123 @default.
• W3093531176 hasConceptScore W3093531176C81917197 @default.
• W3093531176 hasConceptScore W3093531176C95423123 @default.
• W3093531176 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W3093531176 hasLocation W30935311761 @default.
• W3093531176 hasLocation W30935311762 @default.
• W3093531176 hasLocation W30935311763 @default.
• W3093531176 hasOpenAccess W3093531176 @default.
• W3093531176 hasPrimaryLocation W30935311761 @default.
• W3093531176 hasRelatedWork W174237868 @default.
• W3093531176 hasRelatedWork W1980749891 @default.
• W3093531176 hasRelatedWork W1992963551 @default.
• W3093531176 hasRelatedWork W2017681020 @default.
• W3093531176 hasRelatedWork W2045886432 @default.
• W3093531176 hasRelatedWork W2074584121 @default.
• W3093531176 hasRelatedWork W2086041102 @default.
• W3093531176 hasRelatedWork W2089283339 @default.
• W3093531176 hasRelatedWork W2118503249 @default.
• W3093531176 hasRelatedWork W40838594 @default.
• W3093531176 hasVolume "12" @default.
• W3093531176 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3093531176 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3093531176 magId "3093531176" @default.
• W3093531176 workType "article" @default.